Jump to content

Moove

Coach
  • Posts

    1,130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Moove last won the day on July 21 2019

Moove had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Moove's Achievements

1.4k

Reputation

  1. That brings back memories. Visibility was that bad we couldn't see far enough across the pitch to watch the try being scored. Horrible weather, horrible game, horrible journey too IIRC
  2. Defensively he improved as the season went on. He only turned 22 in March and it was his second season at fullback, I don't see why he can't improve further. That said I think he'll end up at 6 eventually whether he stays or goes.
  3. Abysmal rugby league for 85 minutes, a genuine piece of quality to win it, brilliant entertainment
  4. Who's idea was it it to play this game with a wet bar of soap instead of a rugby ball?
  5. I get the same as MjM if I search 'super league fixtures' but get the formatted RL fixture list and table if I search 'superleague fixtures' (no space in superleague)
  6. It would probably help if the proposed change wasn't a reduction in fixtures (and therefore revenue) at a time when the clubs are dealing with lower TV revenue and higher costs. Then on top of that they wait until clubs are about to start season ticket renewals, two months before the end of the season, to propose it. If they had approved it what benefit would they have seen next season as a result? What do they lose by waiting a year and dealing with it alongside the other structure changes?
  7. I don't like loop fixtures, not fussed about magic either tbh. But what alternative were they proposing here? How were they suggesting a 25 game fixture list would work? Why would anyone expect clubs to approve losing a home game the same week they're having to manage a drop in TV income and rising costs as well? For the clubs who cut their cloth is there much cloth left to cut? For the clubs more dependent on wealthy owners were IMG just expecting them to chuck extra in to cover the revenue drop? If the league was to expand to 14 to keep a 27 game fixture list (doesn't seem to be what IMG proposed) which part of 2024 club budgets takes the hit from spreading a key revenue stream thinner? Player wages? Or are we thinking that switching to 14 and getting rid of loop fixtures magically makes the money roll in? Seems a bit of an odd time to make this recommendation when the structure is changing next year anyway and we're just finalising the next TV deal. Surely it's something you propose ahead of negotiating that as part of your long term strategy.
  8. Disappointed the RFL didn't name Kendall for this one, top trolling opportunity missed there.
  9. How do you know if it's consistent or not if you don't know what has been said?
  10. Two six agains for Hull already this half, bloody Kendall, Hull get everything as usual
  11. Are you sure those figures are right? Doesn't seem to match the ever unbiased and balanced views of the FC fans on here
  12. Yeah it's on ITV. Hopefully ours are on BBC. The second Tonga game is the same day as the Union WC final but that's an evening kick-off.
  13. I don't doubt there will have been dialogue (well, to be fair, this is the RFL we're talking about) but I'd be surprised if they'd have been able to confirm what was happening over a month ago when PL teams would have needed to confirm availability for their fixtures. Might have been a bit easier for a Coventry or a Hartlepool (bit random that one). Bolton probably would have been worth exploring instead of Saints - they might have done I guess, who knows.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.