So most if not all agree the following:-
The referee got it correct under current guidelines to err on the side of caution hence the sin bin. The tackle looked and still looks like foul play
The MRP got it correct by issuing a 2 match ban
The ORP v1 (Aka Appeals Panel 1) got it correct with upholding the ban but then used the wrong word(s) which Saints used as a loophole to appeal the appeal decision
The ORP v2 (aka Appeals Panel 2) got it correct as they were boxed in by the words used by ORPv1
The only remaining question is why don’t the RFL via their own policy appeal the current decision, which they can do, as being incorrect or too lenient.
The alternative is that chicken wing type tackles will become the norm unless the current review, which had already been set up by the RFL closes this potential loophole?