Jump to content

Rugby League World
League Express
Garry Schofield Testimonial Brochure (Signed)

Richard de la Riviere

Member Since 30 Apr 2005
Offline Last Active Today, 02:11 PM

#3160977 Town v Broncos

Posted by Richard de la Riviere on 19 July 2015 - 09:55 PM

OK so now its (as we stand) Donny are relegated.

Fev,Dewsbury,London,Town ,Batley,Jambos and Hunslet now play 3 games home 4 game away (depending) and the bottom of the group join Donny in the Championship ??

Only yhe RFL could think of this...Leigh Bradford Sheffield and Halifax play for BIG MONEY against the bottom 4 of Super League and Fev who just miss out could get 100% injury list then lose every game in the play offs and get relegated to to the Southern/welsh league..Love it :-)

Points are carried over, so Fev won't be in any danger

#3156932 Haven reaction

Posted by Richard de la Riviere on 12 July 2015 - 04:30 PM

Get in!

#3041862 Rugby League, A Critical History 1980-2013

Posted by Richard de la Riviere on 06 December 2014 - 08:06 PM

Thanks mate, glad you enjoyed it :)

#3031245 Ed Miliband

Posted by Richard de la Riviere on 11 November 2014 - 01:19 PM

UKIP are a threat to both the Tories and Labour.

This is only true insofar as they're taking votes from both parties, but if Labour could wave a magic wand and get rid of UKIP, would they? No chance! And that's because UKIP are hurting the Tories far more. They're taking Tory votes to Labour votes at a ratio of 3.5 to 1, and crucially whilst they're hurting the Tories in marginals, they're taking Labour votes in Labour heartlands where they won't do much damage seat wise.

#3013218 2015 Election debates

Posted by Richard de la Riviere on 13 October 2014 - 05:26 PM

If there were a general election today, I genuinely think the Lib Dems would struggle to get 25 MPs.  I think it's fairly nailed on that UKIP will get over 30.  So, yes, I think UKIP will out-rank the Lib Dems in both overall voter percentage and returned MPs.  I'm not a gambling man but on this, what about £20 to a mutually agreed charity from the loser?  RFL Benevolent Fund?  MIND?  British Legion?  Cancer Research?

OK, £20 Cancer Research.

As for the debates, Cameron was interviewed on tv earlier and although he started by saying that he was totally in favour of debates he then went on to criticise the proposed format. Word is that he has always been against them so it'll be interesting to see if he can be pinned down and agree to anything.


I'd have thought he'd have been pleased with this though, as he only has to go up against Farage once yet gets to have three cracks at Miliband. It's widely accepted that the Tories will try to turn the election into a presidential style battle between Cameron and Miliband, so this proposal should suit him.


  • ckn likes this

#2932320 Ed Miliband

Posted by Richard de la Riviere on 20 May 2014 - 12:01 AM



If it were as easy as you make out to predict the result based on past voting percentages and a biased electoral system, there'd be little point in bothering with a campaign.

I don't think it's easy to predict, because there are still three possible outcomes: Labour majority, Labour minority or Tory minority. All I'm predicting is no Tory majority, although if Ashcroft reveals on Saturday that the Tories have significantly closed the gap in the marginals from his poll last summer which showed Labour 14pts ahead (twice their national lead) and if the Scots vote for independence (currently 58-42% in favour of No with the gap now widening), then I might revise that.

As for the 3rd and 4th parties, the polls have consistently pointed to one pattern and that is Labour benefitting massively. The key is the 2010 Lib Dem voters. Contrary to popular belief, they actually did very well in the last election with 6.8m votes, and between 25 and 40% of those have told the polls every week since 2010 that they will vote Labour. That is a huge number and it has to reduce significantly to deny Labour. Then there's the 2010 Cons who plan to vote UKIP. That number isn't reducing, but worryingly for Labour, UKIP are now picking up their voters. That might turn into the biggest battleground, but there's little that Crosby and the papers can do about LDs defecting to Labour, and it's that group, above all, which decides whether Miliband gets the key to no10.


You're right that 1992 wasn't predictable, but the main reason for that is that the poll companies got the figures wrong. Their methods were proven to be flawed. They overstated Labour's lead by not taking into account what's now referred to as Shy Tory Factor so it's a myth that millions of people changed their mind at the last minute. They've since altered how they deal with the 'Don't Know' responses to take this into account, and they've also introduced weighted and unweighted samples. If anything, the polls are now overstating the Conservative position, although if that's true the margin of error will be far less. The other pattern that is different is that voters tend not to move from Conservative to Labour or vice versa. They go to another party now, so swings are less pronounced.

#2727133 Rugby League: A Critical History 1980-2013

Posted by Richard de la Riviere on 20 June 2013 - 11:40 AM

Both I hope! Here is the contents list:


Foreword by Garry Schofield

CH1 International RL 1980-95
CH2 International RL 1996-2012

CH3 British RL 1980-1996

CH4 The Super League War

CH5 Super League

CH6 Summer Rugby - Has it Worked?

CH7 Australian Rugby League

CH8 The History of State of Origin

CH9 The Story of The Golden Boot

CH10 The 100 Greatest Players (1980-2012)

CH11 Full Statistical wrap-up - full match details of all GB & England internationals, major finals, award winners & a full list of World XIIIs from 1980