Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

36 Excellent
  1. Easy answer - you play Clarke instead as he is clearly a better player to anyone with eyes.
  2. We were very dominant bar a brief spell in the first half - to say the win was "dodgy to say the least" is pretty daft.
  3. I agree - this proves they are actually only interested in Saints
  4. It's hard enough to get NRL clubs to play in the WCC let alone a 9s competition in the UK
  5. What a ridiculously unbalanced squad - more half backs than props. Grace should have been in - firstly because he's Welsh and we should have a welshman in there, secondly because there's a strong argument to say he's in better form than the wingers named anyway.
  6. We would struggle in the NrL and will struggle against the Roosters. id be very surprised if they didn’t beat us comfortably in the WCC.
  7. So Hicks doesn’t deserve it, didn’t get it, but Saints disgracefully ruled him out? Strange way of looking at it.
  8. If there is no demand for knock-out play-offs / challenge cup we might as well all give up. We as fans whine a lot about the media taking us seriously, about the RFL not pushing the game, but then don’t turn out for the play-offs? Both the standard of that game last night and the crowd it was played in front of made me worry for the sport. Really, really poor.
  9. Awful quality game in front of an even worse crowd. Thoroughly depressing for the game all round I’d say but very very well done to Cas and their supporters - good luck next week!
  10. Three halves on the list and no Lomax, who cleaned up at the season awards of the team finishing top by a country mile. He hasn't lost a game of SL all season. Very odd to see him snubbed in both the dream team and MoS shortlist.
  11. I think he seemed pretty excited about a rebranding of SL too - I'd like to understand what he means by that and the nature/reach of the campaign sitting behind it.
  • Create New...