Salford City Reds v Leeds Rhinos
Started by
ckn
, Jul 21 2010 11:27 AM
37 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 25 July 2010 - 03:20 PM
Salford 12 - 18 Leeds. Who said Leeds would run away with it in the last quarter?
Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.
#22
Posted 25 July 2010 - 03:22 PM
12 - 22 now. ######!
Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.
#23
Posted 25 July 2010 - 03:31 PM
18 - 29 Now. All over.
Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.
#24
Posted 25 July 2010 - 03:41 PM
22 - 31. F-T. Leeds win.
Sounds like a respectable performance by Salford, though.
Sounds like a respectable performance by Salford, though.
Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.
#25
Posted 25 July 2010 - 04:50 PM
QUOTE (tonyXIII @ Jul 25 2010, 04:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
22 - 31. F-T. Leeds win.
Sounds like a respectable performance by Salford, though.
Sounds like a respectable performance by Salford, though.
It does Tony, and most of the time if your team does give 100% you can come away at least pleased that they performed. It's when you can't see the effort it gets you down
Whilst I do not suffer fools gladly, I will always gladly make fools suffer
Comment is free, but facts are sacred. - C. P. Scott
A man is getting along on the road of wisdom when he realises that his opinion is just an opinion
#26
Posted 25 July 2010 - 07:18 PM
Really annoyed at the final hooter, and this was a closer game than the score suggests.
Salford missed holdsworth and I think Leeds missed Peacock.
Leeds are not the team they were, and is it my imagination or have they got dirtier?
Salford missed holdsworth and I think Leeds missed Peacock.
Leeds are not the team they were, and is it my imagination or have they got dirtier?
#27
Posted 25 July 2010 - 07:19 PM
QUOTE (Red Willow @ Jul 25 2010, 08:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Really annoyed at the final hooter, and this was a closer game than the score suggests.
Salford missed holdsworth and I think Leeds missed Peacock.
Leeds are not the team they were, and is it my imagination or have they got dirtier?
Salford missed holdsworth and I think Leeds missed Peacock.
Leeds are not the team they were, and is it my imagination or have they got dirtier?
We can't get any dirtier to some people, from 1 to 17 we're the dirtiest team to have ever walked the earth.
Leeds Rhinos,STILL the only Grand Final winning club NOT to have cheated the salary cap.WCC Champions 2012.
#28
Posted 25 July 2010 - 07:22 PM
QUOTE (terrywebbisgod @ Jul 25 2010, 08:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
We can't get any dirtier to some people, from 1 to 17 we're the dirtiest team to have ever walked the earth.
Now you see

oderint dum metuant
#29
Posted 25 July 2010 - 07:23 PM
QUOTE (giwildgo @ Jul 25 2010, 08:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Now you see 
Again, whatever, was I thinking
Leeds Rhinos,STILL the only Grand Final winning club NOT to have cheated the salary cap.WCC Champions 2012.
#30
Posted 25 July 2010 - 07:24 PM

oderint dum metuant
#31
Posted 25 July 2010 - 07:27 PM
Maybe not the dirtiest but certainly the most cynical. No doubting that at all after watching their antics today. Maguire has now lost that yard - he had a chance first half when given 5 yards and was caught by the 25 yard line. Leeds were fortunate that Bentham was Ref today otherwise it would have been mighty close.
#32
Posted 25 July 2010 - 07:29 PM
QUOTE (Segovia Carpet @ Jul 25 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Maybe not the dirtiest but certainly the most cynical. No doubting that at all after watching their antics today. Maguire has now lost that yard - he had a chance first half when given 5 yards and was caught by the 25 yard line. Leeds were fortunate that Bentham was Ref today otherwise it would have been mighty close.
You do what you can to win games, every other club does it, why not Leeds?
Leeds Rhinos,STILL the only Grand Final winning club NOT to have cheated the salary cap.WCC Champions 2012.
#33
Posted 25 July 2010 - 07:53 PM
Bentham wasn't at his best, that last Leeds try there were at least 2 knock ons that he missed.
Why did the TJ come on only for Bentham to ignore him? was it the hit on the Leeds kicker?
Why did the TJ come on only for Bentham to ignore him? was it the hit on the Leeds kicker?
#34
Posted 25 July 2010 - 08:11 PM
QUOTE (Red Willow @ Jul 25 2010, 08:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Bentham wasn't at his best, that last Leeds try there were at least 2 knock ons that he missed.
Why did the TJ come on only for Bentham to ignore him? was it the hit on the Leeds kicker?
Why did the TJ come on only for Bentham to ignore him? was it the hit on the Leeds kicker?
Yes RW but it was the play before so Bentham could do nothing about it.
#35
Posted 25 July 2010 - 08:28 PM
QUOTE (Segovia Carpet @ Jul 25 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Maybe not the dirtiest but certainly the most cynical. No doubting that at all after watching their antics today. Maguire has now lost that yard - he had a chance first half when given 5 yards and was caught by the 25 yard line. Leeds were fortunate that Bentham was Ref today otherwise it would have been mighty close.
I think the refs calls evened themselves out over the 80 minutes, he gave everything to salford in the first half which along with their clever handling and kicking helped them to a half time lead. We were the better team in the second half by a mile but unlike you were more clinical when we had the territory. Salford looked better when they were shifting the ball around but chose a more conservative approach in the 2nd half which played into leeds hands. As for leeds being dirtier, didn't see anything particulary nasty throughout the game even though there were a few handbags when cashmere started throwing his weight about. Overall, a decent game in a good old fashioned ground with the usual partisan atmosphere from a small but vocal home contingent. One of my favourite awadays.
#36
Posted 26 July 2010 - 07:25 AM
Cashmere throwing his weight about!
he reacted to his team mate being held by the arms by a Leeds player so another Leeds player could hit him. Salford got very few pens in the first half.
Over the whole game leeds deserved the win but it leaves a nasty taste when head tackles on Tyrer went unpunished, yet the borderline one by Fitzy (I don't think it was) led to a try.
he reacted to his team mate being held by the arms by a Leeds player so another Leeds player could hit him. Salford got very few pens in the first half.
Over the whole game leeds deserved the win but it leaves a nasty taste when head tackles on Tyrer went unpunished, yet the borderline one by Fitzy (I don't think it was) led to a try.
#37
Posted 26 July 2010 - 08:17 AM
QUOTE (amh @ Jul 25 2010, 07:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It does Tony, and most of the time if your team does give 100% you can come away at least pleased that they performed. It's when you can't see the effort it gets you down
Absolutely agree, amh. I can forgive (almost) anything if a player or team is trying their best.
Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.
#38
Posted 27 July 2010 - 08:31 PM
Jamie jones buchanan made reference on a podcast to the "reception" the leeds players got as they left the field. He said he loves that kind of thing because it gees him up been a leeds lad. Credit to the salford fans, not many supporters would hang around at the end to chant "you're gonna win ###### all". For one of the smallest crowds they certainly generate an atmosphere in that place.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













