westlondonfan

I am sure you are right but I have always wondered why we have been short ter tenants where ever we go. Instead could we have reached an agreement to stay at a ground for say, 10 - 25 years. It would not be as good as owning a ground I accept but better than being Nomads. Possibly we have left in not the best circumstances. I would have liked Trailfinders as a long term base but I know there are differing views on this.

Not a bad performance from London in the end considering the circumstances but a poor crowd. Below 1,000 I would say. As always, with the news in the last week or so, am still cautiously optimistic about our future.

I must be in the minority then! I enjoyed going to Ealing more than I do Wimbledon. Particularly when the weather was good. An interesting thing about Trailfinders is that it’s one of the few grounds where our attendances went up while we there.

I agree that now we appear to be getting some serious backing going back to Trailfinders would probably not be the right thing to do at this moment in time.

Buying Trailfinders is an impossibility I believe but I imagine that they could have signed a 10 year or longer deal to stay there.

A couple of observations on previous posts. I think Gillingham were keen for us to move there a couple of years ago. Personally I would be against moving out of London. I have heard Australian and Kiwi accents at RL matches in London many times over the years. They are not a long-term strategy though. Having said that has RL ever had a longterm strategy in London? As Jack-A-Roe stated above we only need 10k but it’s how we get them. After what happened with Skolars I just want us to survive and be successful . Personally I thought we should have stayed at Trailfinders on a long term basis but if there is a big injection of cash and support then that may change things.

There are so many questions really. An obvious one is how long will be at Wimbledon now? With the loss of Skolars from the professional ranks I really do hope that the Broncos can survive.

It was a good match. It had a great finish. London should of won it.

Yes. Good try by London right before the break.

I am not sure but three sides fairly full.

There is a bigger crowd than last week.

The stadium and the score line is giving me a real feeling of Deja vu . Still a nice stadium though.

Does that even make sense?

Looking at what has happened to every other club from outside Yorkshire and Lancashire since I have been following RL I don’t see how you can say it is all David Hughes’ fault that London are not what they could be. i was at the match by the way.

The question will then be who is going to replace him. If anyone?