Wellsy4HullFC Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 6 minutes ago, southstand loiner said: hey when has stupidity stopped something been done . just imagine the outrage from the flat earth brigade if it promoted Toronto to the top of the middle 8s . its almost worth doing it just for that As true as that is, it wouldn't just be anti expansionists that would be outraged by that sort of decision. It literally is a ludicrous proposal that is directly disadvantaging all other clubs. It would be supported by no one but the stupid. Even Toronto fans would probably find it bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave T Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 1 minute ago, southstand loiner said: indeed they could also play more games if they want to but mine was just a solution to an unbalanced number that including the magic games as loop fixtures would bring up . oh for the days of 40 plus games a season Magic has been in for over a decade now, I don't think it is a problem that needs fixing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wellsy4HullFC Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, southstand loiner said: indeed they could also play more games if they want to but mine was just a solution to an unbalanced number that including the magic games as loop fixtures would bring up . oh for the days of 40 plus games a season It is a loop fixture though. It's an extra one. I just hope they don't do this did 1st vs 4th idea. 1st vs 3rd, 2nd vs 4th, etc would make far more sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave T Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, Wellsy4HullFC said: It is a loop fixture though. It's an extra one. I just hope they don't do this did 1st vs 4th idea. 1st vs 3rd, 2nd vs 4th, etc would make far more sense. I thought it was a draw from 1st to 4th, 5th to 8th, 9 to 12th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wellsy4HullFC Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 29 minutes ago, Dave T said: I thought it was a draw from 1st to 4th, 5th to 8th, 9 to 12th? That's what it was in 2009-10 (although 9th-14th). HDM are suggesting straight pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbruce Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 5 hours ago, deluded pom? said: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/loop-fixtures-hull-fc-kr-2078900 When the loop fixtures were first mooted I was down by certain posters for suggesting that the Hull derby would be one of them. No you suggested it would be cherry picked as a loop fixture. When we already knew it was going to be odds v evens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deluded pom? Posted October 7, 2018 Author Share Posted October 7, 2018 56 minutes ago, bobbruce said: No you suggested it would be cherry picked as a loop fixture. When we already knew it was going to be odds v evens. And yet several people have queried how they worked out who finished where. Rather convenient don’t you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wellsy4HullFC Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 6 minutes ago, deluded pom? said: And yet several people have queried how they worked out who finished where. Rather convenient don’t you think? Of course prior will query it. There are several ways it could be done. In hindsight, you'd have to use the 8s to work out the odds and evens because had someone like Rovers (who finished 10th in the regular season) been relegated, you'd either have to put the newly promoted team in 10th to fill the gap (which wouldn't make sense) or move everyone up one (which people would still complain about). I don't see any issues here. Only conspiracies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.