Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 401 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, full colour, in-depth coverage from the grassroots through to the international game.
Click here for the digital edition or just download the Rugby League World app from Apple Newsstand or Google Play now.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 401
/ View a Gallery of all our previous 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 401
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

15 years on


  • Please log in to reply
130 replies to this topic

#21 MrPosh

MrPosh
  • Coach
  • 3,079 posts

Posted 21 July 2010 - 10:24 PM

QUOTE (nec @ Jul 21 2010, 10:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Computer's just crashed & I've lost the links but you can google them yourself

Inverness Caledonian Thistle
Rushden & Diamonds
Dagenham & Redbridge

in case you think this is just a modern phenomenon

Carlisle United
Newcastle united

Welsh regional rugby union
Leeds Carnegie
London Irish

I think it does happen here

I don't know about the others, but Newcastle merely changed their name from East End to Newcastle United, after West End, who played at St. James' Park, folded.

Anyway, mergers aren't the right thing to do, but I think that we have to accept that in the longer term, natural selection will leave one of each of the pre-merged teams at a higher level than the others.

I think the first place we'll see this will be with Wakey, Cas and Fev - I feel that SL can only support one of these in the long run and eventually (if the game grows sufficiently) that club will go on to represent the region.
People called Romans they go the house

#22 Padge

Padge
  • Coach
  • 18,016 posts

Posted 21 July 2010 - 10:30 PM

QUOTE (Trojan @ Jul 21 2010, 11:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well perhaps you can explain it to the residents of Workington and Whitehaven and persuade them to pay out their money to watch a merged team.

Well they don't bloody well want to watch two unmerged teams do they.

Visit my photography site www.padge.smugmug.com
Radio 5 Live: Saturday 14 April 2007
Dave Whelan "In Wigan rugby will always be king"

 

This country's wealth was created by men in overalls, it was destroyed by men in suits.


#23 Sleeper

Sleeper
  • Banned
  • 703 posts

Posted 21 July 2010 - 11:36 PM

QUOTE (Cruncher @ Jul 21 2010, 10:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Couldn't disagree more.

Come on, Rugby League is far more than a business! Anyway, what business would contemplate alienating its hardcore customers?

Mergers would inevitably lead to "parochial" fans being lost to the game. Over time some of the tribal allegiance may fade and a few may filter back to watch the merged entity (especially if they are sucessful) but can RL afford to lose any fans at all?


Its your right to disagree but of course that doesnt make you right!

No, its a business first and foremost, tragedy being that the fact it is a business it will only ocurr to some folk when a club side withers and dies. Take a look at Oldham, a population of 100,000+ and a hot bed of RL, sadly its attendences average c 1000!

You claim "mergers would lead inevitably to parochial fans" ....................... sheesh man, its because of a narrow minded and parochial ignorant approach that we have a load of clubs struggling and limping from one unpaid tax bill to the next.

A successful side playing the like of Wigan, Warrington, St Helens, Leeds etc week in week out will attract fans, a side playing Blackpool, Swinton, Hunslet and Doncaster will attract diddly squat apart from its hardcore support which amounts 0.9% of its population!

Until something better comes along, this life will have to do

#24 Sleeper

Sleeper
  • Banned
  • 703 posts

Posted 21 July 2010 - 11:43 PM

QUOTE (Bulletproof @ Jul 21 2010, 10:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I've got some shocking news for you: This isn't Australia. We do things differently here. The fans are different, the sporting climate is different, and the sooner the people in charge of this sport realise that fact this sport can get over its fascination with beating the aussies at a game they are much more interested in.

Mergers have never ever worked in this country. They've tried and failed. We are dicing with the health of our game in two towns where it currently exists to a decent degree for a short term gain, and there wouldnt be this ridiculous scramble to ensure top flight rugby were there a fair and equitable way of achieving top flight status and a chance for every team to manage it.


Dead right there and top marks for observation, it aint Australia and yep, we do do things different here, a great pity we dont do things better!

Maybe the mergers you claim have never worked in this country have failed because they havent been done properly ................... but I have to say there are a vast amount of mergers in industry that have worked!

This lets not bother attitude is one reason the UK is swimming in a cesspit of its own making and we have bred a generation of weak willed jelly fish who ....................... cant be bothered "coz its too hard" all blessed with an ethos of "it probably wont work anyway"!

Edited by Sleeper, 21 July 2010 - 11:44 PM.

Until something better comes along, this life will have to do

#25 Bulletproof

Bulletproof
  • Coach
  • 2,242 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 12:29 AM

QUOTE (Sleeper @ Jul 22 2010, 12:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Dead right there and top marks for observation, it aint Australia and yep, we do do things different here, a great pity we dont do things better!

Maybe the mergers you claim have never worked in this country have failed because they havent been done properly ................... but I have to say there are a vast amount of mergers in industry that have worked!

This lets not bother attitude is one reason the UK is swimming in a cesspit of its own making and we have bred a generation of weak willed jelly fish who ....................... cant be bothered "coz its too hard" all blessed with an ethos of "it probably wont work anyway"!


I'm choosing to ignore your patronising negative attitude and address your post without resorting in kind.

The trouble with this argument is, rugby league isn't strictly a business. People who say it is are missing a whole lot about it. If clubs were strictly a business, no one in their right mind would watch a losing team. If Coca Cola starts to taste awful and gives people illness the customers wont still buy it out of loyalty, they will switch to pepsi. Yet I've seen fans go to watch a Halifax team in super league that didn't have a hope of winning a game all season. You can't treat the fans as customers, they are different. There is an emotional attachment and a sense of community spirit you don't get from true businesses. Sure, they run accounts, and have overheads, but the customers in this case are not the type who will simply wander from product to product when it suits them. Their loyalty is a strength and a weakness. It means you can't simply bank on them going elsewhere if you mess them around and merge and subdue their club. It's more than just a brand to them. But it also means some of them will carry on supporting through thick and thin no matter what is going on with the business side.

Merge Wakey and Cas and a number will refuse to go because it wont be the same and the new entity will represent something else they are not accustomed to or emotionally attached to. You have to accept that no matter what you think of these people. You have to hope that in the long term, you can gain lost ground and overtake that considerably otherwise you are sacrificing two working clubs just to risk one which may work slightly better.

Your last paragraph is of supreme irrelevance to this argument so I wont bother replying to it because you shouldn't have bothered posting it.

#26 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 16,934 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 05:43 AM

QUOTE (nec @ Jul 21 2010, 04:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Initially, several mergers between existing clubs were proposed:

1. Castleford, Wakefield Trinity and Featherstone Rovers would form Calder
2. Hull FC and Hull Kingston Rovers would form Hull"
3. Whitehaven, Workington Town, Barrow and Carlisle would form Cumbria
4. Warrington and Widnes were to form Cheshire
5. Salford and Oldham were to form Manchester
6. Sheffield and Doncaster were to form South Yorkshire

They were to be included with the following stand-alone clubs: St Helens, Wigan, Leeds, Bradford Northern, Halifax, London, Paris and Toulouse.


Which of these would have been better than the current situation for clubs in that area and which will eventually happen anyway?


I don't really know, but I do think that you cannot dismiss mergers as unworkable or "not in the culture" when there is no evidence to support that because none have been properly tried.

I accept entirely that when stood on the terraces of the Jungle Sunday Cas's 6,000 fans and wakeys's 5,000 "hardcore" fans (not all of the 5K were there of course) if joined in matrimony may only turn out to produce anything between 2,000 fans or 8,000 fans - who knows exactly, but short term the likelihood would be lost fans.

But that does not negate the idea of mergers at all. If HKR have 7,000 fans then the club may be financially unviable unless lot's of workplace and pavement accidents continue to be suffered and litigated through Mr. Hudgell.

The whole purpose of any mergers "alienating hardcore fans" is based on the fact that those hardcore fans often do not produce enough income for a SL club to be viable without sugar daddy support. A restructuring of a club through merger is designed to attract wider support such that in time the merged club becomes a sustainable club. And that support needs building over time.

Culture is an important thing. There's no real culture of RL in west London and so Quins have low crowds. Will the culture build and will Quins ever have crowds that can sustain their business. We don't know, but those against the London club will say that all the evidence is there already that people won't watch RL in London so kick them out - an easy if disingenuous argument. If culture is important it has to be allowed to grow. Similarly if there's no culture for watching a combined Hull/HKR now then a merged club won't pull 20K regularly.....But would it 20 years down the line? Culture is only a short term barrier.

The Cas/Wakey/Fev thing is interesting - had a club being merged there and given a better name than proposed (maybe something with a culture heritage like a mining name would have done better) would that club now be able to draw the magic 10,000 sustainable fan level?? More importantly would they now have a stadium and be secure in SL? Would the old tripartite culture be slipping away?? Would the club be challenging for honours and would the new fanbase care about the past???

I think maybe so. Over many years I have watched the fans come and go and bottom line is if you have a financially unsustainable club because your fanbase or customer base is low then you lose money and eventually lose your standing in the league and the fans peel away anyway. "Hardcore" support in effect can only be counted in the hundreds.

The fact seems to be fans love success and top level RL. That's the difference between 1000 hardcore HKR fans at a Chorley game against the 7,000 now watching the Australian version of HKR. They are a flakey bunch and if a merged club offered SL rugby and a good day out they will come, maybe not tommorrow but in time.

But heed the dark dire warning that if a traditional club abandons it's fans then those fans will "walk away" and there'll be no fans? e.g. if the Hull clubs merged "west Hull would all turn to soccer"

I suspect that the top level RL game itself is much a stronger draw than the tradition of any club by miles, and if it is not then RL is doomed anyway........

#27 nec

nec
  • Coach
  • 2,323 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 07:13 AM

QUOTE (Bulletproof @ Jul 21 2010, 11:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm confused. Which of those are top flight english rugby league clubs?
Did you state you were only interested in rl? My reading of your point was that you thought mergers weren't part of uk culture...
Rugby League is a sport that desperately needs to expand its geographical supporter base and its player base. This imperative means that all other requirements are secondary until this is done.

All power in the game should be with governing bodies, especially international governing bodies.

Without these actions we will remain a minor sport internationally and nationally.

#28 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 15,018 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 09:02 AM

QUOTE (Bulletproof @ Jul 22 2010, 01:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm choosing to ignore your patronising negative attitude and address your post without resorting in kind.

The trouble with this argument is, rugby league isn't strictly a business. People who say it is are missing a whole lot about it. If clubs were strictly a business, no one in their right mind would watch a losing team. If Coca Cola starts to taste awful and gives people illness the customers wont still buy it out of loyalty, they will switch to pepsi. Yet I've seen fans go to watch a Halifax team in super league that didn't have a hope of winning a game all season. You can't treat the fans as customers, they are different. There is an emotional attachment and a sense of community spirit you don't get from true businesses. Sure, they run accounts, and have overheads, but the customers in this case are not the type who will simply wander from product to product when it suits them. Their loyalty is a strength and a weakness. It means you can't simply bank on them going elsewhere if you mess them around and merge and subdue their club. It's more than just a brand to them. But it also means some of them will carry on supporting through thick and thin no matter what is going on with the business side.

Merge Wakey and Cas and a number will refuse to go because it wont be the same and the new entity will represent something else they are not accustomed to or emotionally attached to. You have to accept that no matter what you think of these people. You have to hope that in the long term, you can gain lost ground and overtake that considerably otherwise you are sacrificing two working clubs just to risk one which may work slightly better.

Your last paragraph is of supreme irrelevance to this argument so I wont bother replying to it because you shouldn't have bothered posting it.


Nail on head. It's called tribalism. It doesn't make sense for there to be two premiership soccer teams in Liverpool whose grounds are not only within comfortable walking distance, but with sight of one another. But there they are. And they get good crowds week in week out. Sport is not a business. I don't know how you'd describe it. Businesses don't get volunteers in to help them run their operations - RL Clubs do. Businesses don't depend on their rivals' surivival for their own survival, RL Clubs do, businsess don't rely on amateur versions of themsleves to provide skilled workers. And as you say if businesses start producing poor quality product then some of those who buy that product will (eventually) go elsewhere. But most RL fans stick with their teams through thin and thinner.
"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013

#29 Phil

Phil
  • Coach
  • 1,894 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 10:59 AM

Logically mergers make sense, but , as has been pointed out this is sport, when your team aren't coming up to scratch you don't go and support the team 5 miles away until your lot get their act together.

also for a merger to work, the clubs have to be within striking distance of each other, BUT, its those clubs who traditionally have the bitterest rivalry, Batley and Dewsbury for example, bitter rivals, both unsuccessful teams (yeah I know rolleyes.gif well done Batley biggrin.gif ). so logically speaking prime candidates for merging, but having mates who support both teams I know, it just wouldn't work, they hate each other too much. Likewise when it was floated that Halifax merge with Bradford, the Fax fans just said no way would we go to watch a Bradifax team, we hate 'em, we want to beat 'em not merge with 'em.

I won't pretend to know the answer but I think merging is dead, it was never alive in fact.
"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin

#30 a.n Other

a.n Other
  • Coach
  • 1,548 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 11:27 AM

QUOTE (Phil @ Jul 22 2010, 11:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Likewise when it was floated that Halifax merge with Bradford, the Fax fans just said no way would we go to watch a Bradifax team, we hate 'em, we want to beat 'em not merge with 'em.

I won't pretend to know the answer but I think merging is dead, it was never alive in fact.


I agreed with that 15 years ago - but times have changed for some - I would watch a merged Halifax/Bradford side, if they were based at the Shay and the home colours were blue and white. Could have Red, Amber and Black for the away shirt.

Edited by a.n Other, 22 July 2010 - 11:27 AM.


#31 roughyedspud

roughyedspud
  • Coach
  • 3,586 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 11:32 AM

QUOTE
Take a look at Oldham, a population of 100,000+ and a hot bed of RL, sadly its attendences average c 1000!


try 210,000+

OLDHAM RLFC
the 8TH most successful team in british RL


#32 Johnoco

Johnoco
  • Coach
  • 19,699 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 11:39 AM

QUOTE (Trojan @ Jul 22 2010, 10:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Sport is not a business.


laugh.gif laugh.gif

Of course it is, don't be so naive.

No I don't care if you're if you're into different bands

No cause for so much hatred, I'm just a different man

Pull off that cover, I will too, and learn to understand

With music deep inside we'll make world unity our plan

 

7 Seconds -Walk Together, Rock Together


#33 nec

nec
  • Coach
  • 2,323 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 11:51 AM

QUOTE (Trojan @ Jul 22 2010, 10:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nail on head. It's called tribalism. It doesn't make sense for there to be two premiership soccer teams in Liverpool whose grounds are not only within comfortable walking distance, but with sight of one another. But there they are. And they get good crowds week in week out. Sport is not a business. I don't know how you'd describe it. Businesses don't get volunteers in to help them run their operations - RL Clubs do. Businesses don't depend on their rivals' surivival for their own survival, RL Clubs do, businsess don't rely on amateur versions of themsleves to provide skilled workers. And as you say if businesses start producing poor quality product then some of those who buy that product will (eventually) go elsewhere. But most RL fans stick with their teams through thin and thinner.

Point 1. Liverpool's football clubs are both technically insolvent and will not be able to build their own grounds so may need to share facilities to ever compete at the top again. If they were outside the Premiership I'm certain that some officials would be exploring the prospect of a merger as has happened in Sheffield & Bristol

Point 2. Business loyalty, especially within retail and leisure is actually quite a major aspect, it is usually referred to as inertia because in business loyalty to a failing product is thought to be bad. I remained loyal to the Independent through many years, I will not go to other DIY stores other than B&Q and my clothes shopping is done at Austin Reed. Are there other places available that may offer better product at the same or lower prices? Probably, but I'm not going to invest too much time in finding out
Rugby League is a sport that desperately needs to expand its geographical supporter base and its player base. This imperative means that all other requirements are secondary until this is done.

All power in the game should be with governing bodies, especially international governing bodies.

Without these actions we will remain a minor sport internationally and nationally.

#34 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 16,934 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 11:59 AM

QUOTE (MrPosh @ Jul 21 2010, 11:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Anyway, mergers aren't the right thing to do, but I think that we have to accept that in the longer term, natural selection will leave one of each of the pre-merged teams at a higher level than the others.

I think the first place we'll see this will be with Wakey, Cas and Fev - I feel that SL can only support one of these in the long run and eventually (if the game grows sufficiently) that club will go on to represent the region.


That's the nail on the head Mr. P.

People often say the fans won't watch a merged club, not that there's any evidence of it and not that those who say it will pay any heed to a number of people on here who on a regular basis say "well if it happens I actually WILL watch a merged club". Fans will react various ways and come and go for various reasons.

Take the professional clubs in Leeds. In my first ten years in Leeds watching RL I saw Hunslet at Wembley, Leeds at Wembley and Bramley lift the BBC Floodit trophy.

In that time there were about 1,500 Bramley fans on a good day 2,000 Hunslet fans on a good day and 6,000 Leeds fans on a good day.

Now the only good days are up at Headingley where the Rhinos draw a current average of 15,000 fans.

Nobody has to merge at all, it is merely one option, but the other option clearly isn't to stay the same otherwise we may still have a competetive Bramley and Hunslet being taken some notice of in Leeds.

We may have lost one and nearly lost another pro-club in Leeds but the game is drawing thousands more fans through the turnstyles, and feeding a lucrative TV contract accordingly.

Same will go for anywhere else. Wigan are now averaging 14000 whilst Leigh had a crowd as low as 1400 last year. Some people with one eye may tell us the game is dying as a result of that Leigh crowd. On the contrary use two eyes and see how the game is watched by more people nowadays - just not in the same places.

Leading onto an ambiguity Mr. P????

If you say one club could "go on to represent the region" in the Calder area, which in turn indicates it will have a wider fan base and all the best juniors, then why make the comment that "mergers aren't the right thing to do"

Mergers were resisted most vehemently in the so called Calder area with protests at matches, and even books being produced to capitalise on the hoo-ha..

It will be interesting to see what the combined home gates are for Cas, Wakey and Fev in 2014 if a ground does not materialise?????

Equally it would be interesting to project what the crowds and the team would be if only one of the three stayed in SL with a new ground.



#35 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 16,934 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 12:05 PM

QUOTE (Phil @ Jul 22 2010, 11:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I know, it just wouldn't work, they hate each other too much. Likewise when it was floated that Halifax merge with Bradford, the Fax fans just said no way would we go to watch a Bradifax team, we hate 'em, we want to beat 'em not merge with 'em.

I won't pretend to know the answer but I think merging is dead, it was never alive in fact.


Likewise Hunslet and Leeds hated each other, but everyone in Leeds now goes to Headingley - three times SL champions. There was no merger but Leeds got all the fans anyway.

Staying as you are is not always an option unless you like being small, as the Bradford crowds start to plummet and the stadium continues to rot.........

#36 Lobbygobbler

Lobbygobbler
  • Coach
  • 5,786 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 12:06 PM

QUOTE (nec @ Jul 21 2010, 10:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Computer's just crashed & I've lost the links but you can google them yourself

Inverness Caledonian Thistle
Rushden & Diamonds
Dagenham & Redbridge


Welsh regional rugby union
Leeds Carnegie
London Irish

I think it does happen here



I would argue that for the 3 football teams and Leeds Carnegie, the constituent clubs pre-merger were significantly smaller support/cathcment area-wise and with less successful history, than some of the RL mergers weve seen discussed.

For the Welsh Union clubs I'm not convinced either that they have been fully accepted, or that the single merged club rather than the two previous un-merged clubs gets a bigger cumulative attendance (if you take out the fact that Celtic League attendances are swollen anyway by visits of Munster and Leinster). The other thing you have to bear in mind is that these merged teams were guaranteed a top flight spot and likely Heineken cup games.

Best candidates for an RL merger then are two currently unsuccessful clubs, without much glorious history, with a decent catchment area. To be honest there aren't any clubs which match this. Even the closest contenders (Worky/Haven, and Batley/Dewsbury) have a much richer heritage than the soccer/union mergers. The only way these two could work is if they were given guaranteed SL spots for a long period

#37 Lobbygobbler

Lobbygobbler
  • Coach
  • 5,786 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 12:10 PM

QUOTE (The Parksider @ Jul 22 2010, 12:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's the nail on the head Mr. P.

People often say the fans won't watch a merged club, not that there's any evidence of it and not that those who say it will pay any heed to a number of people on here who on a regular basis say "well if it happens I actually WILL watch a merged club". Fans will react various ways and come and go for various reasons.

Take the professional clubs in Leeds. In my first ten years in Leeds watching RL I saw Hunslet at Wembley, Leeds at Wembley and Bramley lift the BBC Floodit trophy.

In that time there were about 1,500 Bramley fans on a good day 2,000 Hunslet fans on a good day and 6,000 Leeds fans on a good day.

Now the only good days are up at Headingley where the Rhinos draw a current average of 15,000 fans.

Nobody has to merge at all, it is merely one option, but the other option clearly isn't to stay the same otherwise we may still have a competetive Bramley and Hunslet being taken some notice of in Leeds.

We may have lost one and nearly lost another pro-club in Leeds but the game is drawing thousands more fans through the turnstyles, and feeding a lucrative TV contract accordingly.

Same will go for anywhere else. Wigan are now averaging 14000 whilst Leigh had a crowd as low as 1400 last year. Some people with one eye may tell us the game is dying as a result of that Leigh crowd. On the contrary use two eyes and see how the game is watched by more people nowadays - just not in the same places.

Leading onto an ambiguity Mr. P????

If you say one club could "go on to represent the region" in the Calder area, which in turn indicates it will have a wider fan base and all the best juniors, then why make the comment that "mergers aren't the right thing to do"

Mergers were resisted most vehemently in the so called Calder area with protests at matches, and even books being produced to capitalise on the hoo-ha..

It will be interesting to see what the combined home gates are for Cas, Wakey and Fev in 2014 if a ground does not materialise?????

Equally it would be interesting to project what the crowds and the team would be if only one of the three stayed in SL with a new ground.


With a decent P&R system and fully pro 2nd tier, both Leigh and Wigan could get better gates than you stated. If we folded tomorrow, extra crowds at Wigan will not come from the Leigh area

Surely its better to have more clubs with good support?

#38 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 16,934 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 12:20 PM

QUOTE (Lobbygobbler @ Jul 22 2010, 01:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
With a decent P&R system and fully pro 2nd tier, both Leigh and Wigan could get better gates than you stated. If we folded tomorrow, extra crowds at Wigan will not come from the Leigh area

Surely its better to have more clubs with good support?


I am fully with you in the idea that an option could be a fully pro second tier, and a decent P & R system.

12 clubs in two divisions all with 500K SKY money a year and all able to add 300K or so for a salary cap of 800K.

With that clubs could go from the bottom of Division 2 to the top of division one.

I think that option could be fraught with possible difficulties Lobby, and it may be an option that is politically blocked say by SKY I just don't know............

But I do take great issue with you telling me thet people who live in the Leigh area will not go watch Wigan.

Absolute myth. Who are you to say what others will do, and why say something like that when literally tens of thousands of soccer and rugby fans travel miles out of their local area to watch a variety of clubs for a variety of reasons????



#39 nec

nec
  • Coach
  • 2,323 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 12:31 PM

I think some contributors are living in a world that no longer exists, loyalty to a town or suburb in a society with as much population flux as the UK in 2010 is waning. Where I work, 10 miles outside Carlisle, there are 200-300 staff, less than half of which were born within 50 miles of the workplace. Many of the people who have moved into the area support the local football side and travelled to Wembley with them, they also retain support for their 'home town' club, but consider it impractical and take their kids to watch a reasonably competitive local side instead. These are the people that would be targeted by 'new' clubs.

We can spend the next 10 years worrying about what 'diehard' supporters of Dewsbury & Batley would do if the clubs merged, only to find that the diehards have moved away to improve employment prospects and newcomers have no interest in watching poorly supported clubs at a low level of competition.

The next generation of RL fans in West Cumbria, the ones that would be essential to make any top level club a success, are currently wearing Liverpool, Chelsea & Man U shirts. They may be 10 generations Marra, they may be the sons/daughters of people that moved into the area to work at Sellafield. They are less bothered by a rivalry that means less with every passing year as people move, marry folk from the next door town, go to school there, go shopping there and travel with people from that town to watch other sports.

We have to start planning for 2020 not pretending it is still 1980.
Rugby League is a sport that desperately needs to expand its geographical supporter base and its player base. This imperative means that all other requirements are secondary until this is done.

All power in the game should be with governing bodies, especially international governing bodies.

Without these actions we will remain a minor sport internationally and nationally.

#40 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 15,018 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 12:53 PM

QUOTE (nec @ Jul 22 2010, 12:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Point 1. Liverpool's football clubs are both technically insolvent and will not be able to build their own grounds so may need to share facilities to ever compete at the top again. If they were outside the Premiership I'm certain that some officials would be exploring the prospect of a merger as has happened in Sheffield & Bristol

Point 2. Business loyalty, especially within retail and leisure is actually quite a major aspect, it is usually referred to as inertia because in business loyalty to a failing product is thought to be bad. I remained loyal to the Independent through many years, I will not go to other DIY stores other than B&Q and my clothes shopping is done at Austin Reed. Are there other places available that may offer better product at the same or lower prices? Probably, but I'm not going to invest too much time in finding out


How many businesses need their rivals to continue in existence.How many businesses get volunteers in the help run things? None. Pro sport in the uk certainly at SL level and below cannot be described as a business.
"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users