would of been nice to say bradford deserved it but tbh nobody deserved anything in that game so poor all round the highlight of the game was leaving. wakefield just gave bradford it on a silver plate and im glad they took it.
I thought both sides scored some cracking tries tbh, mate. As a Bradford fan the quality of the game was irrelevant; we needed a win before the end of the season. Wakefield looked good in the forwards and made far more gound than I was happy with, and Obst directed them round the paddock pretty well when they got their roll on.
It seemed to me that St Hilaire tried to put players back into their 'normal' positions this week, with only Addy out of his usual spot in the forwards and Danny was terrific for the Bulls and, for once, I totally agreed with the sponsor's MOM decision. The forwards went well in our periods of dominance and Kearney, Godwin and L'Estrange took full advantage of the space created. As he gets a fair bit of stick on here, I'll say Mick Worrincy had a decent game, he ran hard and made his tackles. Langers never stopped running, Scrutes looked a bit more on the pace than last week , Koppy has kept up his stronger running performances and Lynchy was Lynchy. Both centres played well, which is nice to be able to say, Sykes looked far more at home there than he does in the halves and Platt keeps improving.
I guess Wakey fans might feel they should have won, well maybe they should, but they didn't. Despite the long run of defeats there have been plenty of games amongst them where we 'should' have won, but didn't, so it's nice to get the points.