JohnM

I'd like to say that's a fair and balanced assessment....... ... But I can't .... Because it isn't.

Or borrowed some from Saints.

However, it's the RFLs role to be absolutely all over the regulations and to enforce them, regardless of sentiment. Ooh! Does that mean the RFL must enforce ALL the sport's rules? That should be fun.

Lost and gone forever: a large red Norweb inflatable lightbulb from their days as major Wigan benefactors.

Bleedin' 'ell! Someone on the forum even older than me!

But Harry believes not on tighter criteria but in absurd criteria: your place of birth dictated the country you represent. Next he'll be demanding you can only play for or watch Leigh if you were born in Wigan MBC.

https://biologyinsights.com/is-pizza-good-for-athletes-timing-and-nutrition/

https://www.sportcal.com/pressreleases/pizza-hut-in-2m-sponsorship-of-premier-leagues-fulham/

We should have had no truck with Stobart. (It's too hot to get my coat....)

Specsavers sponsorship of the matchday officials.

Rules are there to be rewritten to meet an ambition. London could be invited into SL merely by changing the entry conditions and merely by removing any cap on overseas players. Not that the RFL would do such a thing, of course.

For clarity, I wasn't referring to LE . I saw a post somewhere from a caller of a game that was somewhat different from his norm and that set me wondering.....

Triggered by an unusually erudite report on the Wire v Bradford game, is ChatGPT/Copilot etc already in use to create readable copy from scrambled game notes?

There are clinics for that sort of thing, Harry. Your GP can refer you.

Maybe Peet could have rested a few players and borrowed one or two from Hull KR for the game. I think something similar happened with Saints and HKR a few weeks ago. Maybe Peet was preferring to use his own players rather than someone else's.