Jump to content

Rugby League World Cup 2017 Tours – Register Your Interest Now!
Join TotalRL.com, League Express & Rugby League World at the 2017 Rugby League World Cup in Australia, New Zealand & Papua New Guinea! Click here for more info

Rugby League World
FREE 2016 Fixture Guide
League Express

Rugby League Yearbook 2015-2016


Member Since 10 Nov 2009
Offline Last Active Today, 12:01 AM

#3107438 16 Apr: Wigan Warriors v Warrington Wolves KO 8pm (TV)

Posted by BulldogBurt on 17 April 2015 - 01:55 PM

Flower was public enemy number one, world wide (ish), he lost Wigan a Grand Final (we would have stuffed Saints with a full team).

You expect to hear stuff like this from partisan fans on a debate forum, but I was genuinely surprised to hear Shaun Wane on Boots n All say that Flower had cost his team mates a GF win, the surprising bit being that he added 'we'd have won by 30 (with 13 men)...everybody knows that'(!)

Not sure why I was surprised tbh, he's always come across as a classless oaf so it was true to form.

#2893353 06/03/14 - Widnes Vikings v Salford Red Devils KO 8pm (Sky Sports)

Posted by BulldogBurt on 05 March 2014 - 01:55 PM

Widnes must start favourites for this, we've had two impressive wins so far even with key players missing. The most pleasing thing for me has been the way we've coped with the losses of Clarke and Brown (both really influential figures within the team) and Phelps, Ah Van and Cahill (who all had strong seasons last year, particularly Cahill who is a tireless worker on the field and a real leader) without a significant drop in performances.
Although there has been a lot of hype around the Salford team, when assessing our rivals squads I always like to compare them with ours and who they would replace, and perhaps surprisingly, there aren't many I would swap. Rangi would've been a given 2 yrs ago before the emergence of Mellor who is an outstanding team player (don't get me wrong, Rangi is an outstanding individual who produces pieces of magic but possibly would risk upsetting the balance we seem to have) Tim Smith is too hot and cold to build a team around and having watched Hock last year I'd swap tickle for him every day of the week, he can be a complete liability in attack with ridiculous offloads which just aren't on and in defence with indiscipline, also his reputation does him no favours with referees on top of that. Tickle on the other hand is consistent and has started superbly for us, before you take his goal kicking into account. I've never been a huge fan of Puletua as his work rate seems lacking for me although admittedly, that's just going off Sky matches and when we have played St's. Likewise, Meli and Gleeson would be no better (and IMO a fair bit worse over the course of a season) than Phelps and Marsh. However, Morley looks fit and motivated and would walk into our squad and I've always rated Hansen who was an unsung hero at Wigan, I'd have been made up if we'd signed him. They look to have a couple of decent prospects like Fages and the young winger who played against St's.
They also have a coach who is one of the best in the game.
Having said all that, I think it will be a close game and that inconsistent nature of some of the Red Devils players means that in some games at least, those players will all be on form and firing, I just hope it's not on Thursday!

#2889303 Is 'jeopardy' a dead duck?

Posted by BulldogBurt on 26 February 2014 - 10:26 PM


Like some others on this threat, it would be better to read what's written rather than what you think has been written.


I suspect this jibe is aimed at me, even though I explained I was referring to a post of yours (and supplied you with said quote) and not, as you persist in suggesting, misrepresenting what was in the article.
Believe me I have read the article and thought it was a poor argument, and nothing I've read in your replies thus far has changed that viewpoint.

#2888850 Is 'jeopardy' a dead duck?

Posted by BulldogBurt on 26 February 2014 - 11:53 AM

That's a rather pompous and ridiculous putdown.

Attendances are factual. There has been a 50% decline for this particular game in less than a year. A commissioned report suggests that jeopardy will increase attendances. This game was the first indicator of whether that might happen. It was the first swallow in spring, and it doesn't confirm the theory. Other games might, which I concede. If you think the other factors were more important, I'm happy to let you explain why and do the analysis.

The only pompous and ridiculous thing here is your assertion that this game was the first indicator of a theory, when it clearly wasn't. If the game had sold out it would have represented a 40% drop on last year's attendance figure. Figures are factual, your disingenuous interpretation of them however...

#2888803 Is 'jeopardy' a dead duck?

Posted by BulldogBurt on 26 February 2014 - 10:57 AM

Strange article with more than a little 'I told you so' coming through IMO, which is bizarre given that we're 2 rounds in to the season and the 'jeopardy' aspect of the restructure doesn't even start until next season.
It's also disingenuous to use the Wakey v Bradford crowd to support your viewpoint given that the match was not a fair comparison with last season's fixture, with it being held on a Thursday, on Sky and in a ground with a 5000 capacity cap.

#2886200 Bradford Bulls - Change of Ownership (Merged Threads)

Posted by BulldogBurt on 22 February 2014 - 04:34 PM

I assume you missed the bit where Bradford actually got deducted more points than those teams? And got punished much more heavily financially? No?

Not a comment on the current Bulls situation, but for clarity, I'm pretty sure Widnes were docked 9 pts (3 wins so equal to Bulls) and denied entry to SL with administration as the stated reason, despite O'Connor settling the existing debts so not sure how Bulls were penalised MORE heavily than that?