bromleybulldog Posted February 17 Posted February 17 What Fred meant is that we should nominate three players only- first, second, and third. One of the responses in the Newcastle game thread had five players!! (2x first, 1x second and 2x third).
phildog Posted February 17 Posted February 17 Sorry Fredm, I've only just realised that what you said isn't what I thought you'd said! You meant that nobody can split a vote (Fred and Phil couldn't be split so voted for both). In that I agree.
RogerT Posted February 17 Author Posted February 17 So therefore in the Newcastle match the points gain are 1, Butterworth with 2 votes, 2 no winner all had 1 vote apiece, 3 Parson with 2 votes, all the others go into what I will call the also rans.
phildog Posted February 17 Posted February 17 I have already admitted to that error as we have discussed elsewhere....didn't realise there would be so much controversy.
redditchbulldog Posted February 19 Posted February 19 On 11/02/2025 at 18:40, phildog said: I will try and check that with Redditch but he's rather difficult to get hold of. Just seen this, no-one has tried to get hold of me 2 Stoopid Cup Winner 2012
RogerT Posted February 19 Author Posted February 19 Hello Nigel I have sent you an email regarding this.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now