Jump to content

Lyon


Eddie

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, hunsletgreenandgold said:

Yes.......? So what's your point? Has it been a huge step forward so far or we just waiting on Toulouse? 

nah les catalans have been a massive failure.

toronto will add nothing to super league except global media coverage, and a full stadium with 10k each week.

real shame it wasnt featherstone who won the promotion game, super league would have been a whole lot better.


  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
47 minutes ago, aj1908 said:

yes because thats likely to actually happen.  imagine a super league with all those teams in it.  would be a big step forward imo

If all teams are in a division together, there is a possibility that it could happen. Would it? Why so? 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Oliver Clothesoff said:

If all teams are in a division together, there is a possibility that it could happen. Would it? Why so? 

Yes

Yes

Because it will be 

Posted
1 hour ago, hunsletgreenandgold said:

Yes.......? So what's your point? Has it been a huge step forward so far or we just waiting on Toulouse? 

We need to wait for Toulouse, that is the game changer. After all as we often hear on this forum their 1,500 fans will turn into 15,000 as soon as they go up and there is also a multi million French tv deal ready to be signed once they’re in. 

Posted
1 hour ago, aj1908 said:

just have P and R with all the small english teams.  leave the expansion teams out of that nonsense.

There isn’t an english team in the SL, or one that’s been in it in the last 10 years, that are smaller than Toulouse currently are. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Eddie said:

We need to wait for Toulouse, that is the game changer. After all as we often hear on this forum their 1,500 fans will turn into 15,000 as soon as they go up and there is also a multi million French tv deal ready to be signed once they’re in. 

Les Catalans crowds before super league and after 

Rinse and repeat with Toulouse 

Especially after the crowd at.ernest Waldron last year 

Even the Toulose union team have a belief in them letting them share their stadium 

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, aj1908 said:

Les Catalans crowds before super league and after 

Rinse and repeat with Toulouse 

Especially after the crowd at.ernest Waldron last year 

Even the Toulose union team have a belief in them letting them share their stadium 

 

You can’t say that because one team has had fairly successful crowds then another will, just because they’re from the same country. I’d love to see Toulouse getting five figure crowds in SL but there is literally nothing to suggest they will imho. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Eddie said:

You can’t say that because one team has had fairly successful crowds then another will, just because they’re from the same country. I’d love to see Toulouse getting five figure crowds in SL but there is literally nothing to suggest they will imho. 

On the same note you have no justification for saying they won't be successful either 

Posted
Just now, The Daddy said:

On the same note you have no justification for saying they won't be successful either 

I’m not saying they won’t be, I’m saying I don’t know whether they will be or not. 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Eddie said:

We need to wait for Toulouse, that is the game changer. After all as we often hear on this forum their 1,500 fans will turn into 15,000 as soon as they go up and there is also a multi million French tv deal ready to be signed once they’re in. 

Wondered how long it would take you to get that in? Did you start this thread just to get there?

Posted
1 minute ago, Oliver Clothesoff said:

Are you trying to suggest that because Toulouse had a five figure crowd 65 years ago, they’ll get one again?

It appears that he is. On the same note he must think Oldham would average 28,000 if they returned to the top flight  

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Scubby said:

Wondered how long it would take you to get that in? Did you start this thread just to get there?

Actually no, it was other people who (as usual) diverted it onto Toulouse and this absurd notion that they should be given a place in SL and keep it, without earning it on the pitch. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Oliver Clothesoff said:

Are you trying to suggest that because Toulouse had a five figure crowd 65 years ago, they’ll get one again?

im trying to say that league has been established in toulose before and been very sucesful.

and theres a very strong chance this will repeat.  espeically after the toronto crowd

i kept the post vague because i knew people would respond as you have lol

Posted
5 minutes ago, aj1908 said:

im trying to say that league has been established in toulose before and been very sucesful.

and theres a very strong chance this will repeat.  espeically after the toronto crowd

i kept the post vague because i knew people would respond as you have lol

Out of interest, what was the last five figure crowd since a World Cup Final 65 years ago? 

Posted
Just now, Oliver Clothesoff said:

Out of interest, what was the last five figure crowd since a World Cup Final 65 years ago? 

why are you fixated on crowds over 10k?

the super league crowd average is well below this

they got 6k for the game vs toronto last year in the championship

the proof is already there.  they will easily be one of the clubs in super league with a higher crowd average because lets be honest, the bar is quite low to beat at the bottom

Posted
24 minutes ago, Eddie said:

Actually no, it was other people who (as usual) diverted it onto Toulouse and this absurd notion that they should be given a place in SL and keep it, without earning it on the pitch. 

Is it absurd and a mistake that Catalans were allowed this?

Posted
23 minutes ago, aj1908 said:

why are you fixated on crowds over 10k?

the super league crowd average is well below this

they got 6k for the game vs toronto last year in the championship

the proof is already there.  they will easily be one of the clubs in super league with a higher crowd average because lets be honest, the bar is quite low to beat at the bottom

I’m not, it seems that you are because you’re trying to use a crowd from 65 years in a game that was the very pinnacle of the game to justify the inclusion of Toulouse Olympique in Super League. 

Also “proof” equates to a lot more than one game. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Oliver Clothesoff said:

I’m not, it seems that you are because you’re trying to use a crowd from 65 years in a game that was the very pinnacle of the game to justify the inclusion of Toulouse Olympique in Super League. 

Also “proof” equates to a lot more than one game. 

lucky you arent making the decision about toulose in super league then with all these demands for "proof".

though ralph wouldnt be far off your views in expanding the game.

Posted
17 minutes ago, DoubleD said:

Is it absurd and a mistake that Catalans were allowed this?

Yes, they should have been relegated on finishing bottom, rather than making the likes of Widnes go down when they’d finished above them. Widnes never recovered from that which is shameful as far as I’m concerned. 

What makes Catalans more worthy than them, or any team more worthy than another when it comes to a place in the top flight - it should all be down to results on the pitch imho. 

Posted
40 minutes ago, aj1908 said:

why are you fixated on crowds over 10k?

the super league crowd average is well below this

they got 6k for the game vs toronto last year in the championship

the proof is already there.  they will easily be one of the clubs in super league with a higher crowd average because lets be honest, the bar is quite low to beat at the bottom

It’s not really, the lowest average is far bigger than Toulouse’s average. 

Plenty of Championship  teams get bigger gates than Toulouse, so why aren’t you bleating on about them being given a place? By your logic Widnes would be getting 15,000 every week if they went up, and Bradford 20,000. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Eddie said:

Yes, they should have been relegated on finishing bottom, rather than making the likes of Widnes go down when they’d finished above them. Widnes never recovered from that which is shameful as far as I’m concerned. 

What makes Catalans more worthy than them, or any team more worthy than another when it comes to a place in the top flight - it should all be down to results on the pitch imho. 

Nice one Eddie, keep those blinkers on

Posted
2 minutes ago, Eddie said:

Yes, they should have been relegated on finishing bottom, rather than making the likes of Widnes go down when they’d finished above them. Widnes never recovered from that which is shameful as far as I’m concerned. 

What makes Catalans more worthy than them, or any team more worthy than another when it comes to a place in the top flight - it should all be down to results on the pitch imho. 

well if league was like soccer and had like 50 massive clubs, sure that would be a fine argument.

but youve got six big clubs, the expansion clubs then the rest are all a bit meh.

the only reason P and R works with soccer is because its such a massive sport, with so many massive clubs.

look how many ex Premier league sides are rattling around out of it, but with crowds of 14k - 35k on average.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.