Jump to content


TotalRL.com Shop Alert: Last Ordering Date for Free Pre-Xmas Delivery within UK: 2pm Thursday 18th December!!
Rugby League Yearbook 2014/15 The Forbidden Game League Express League Express Gift Card Rugby League World Rugby League World Gift Card
Buy Now £14.99 Buy Now £14.99 / Kindle Print / Digital Subscription Gift Cards Print / Digital Subscription Gift Cards



Photo
- - - - -

Kear sees the light on franchising


  • Please log in to reply
214 replies to this topic

#81 Pride & Heritage

Pride & Heritage
  • Coach
  • 464 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 01:34 PM

QUOTE (dallymessenger @ Jul 1 2010, 02:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
the most succesful RL competition in the world was built on a closed shop.

the NFL has no P&R.

RL in england cant afford P&R either.

for P&R to work you need lots of well funded and widely supported clubs

RL doesnt have it


Why does it need to be well funded? Why not just have 14 teams with the same budget and therefore almost guaranteeing that 1 team will not dominate for decades? Does the best sport have to be played by the absolute best and skillful players, or is the best sport played out by equally skilled teams? Is it better to watch say St. Helens with a team full of internationals from around the world stuffing say Castleford or Catalan by 60 points every week? Or would you rather watch a game like the recent Huddersfield and Hull KR game which was in doubt until the last kick of the game? No contest IMO, nobody wants to watch sport that is a dead cert.

Why do we have this obsession with Austrailia, it is their national sport, so it is an entirely different situation and just because something works in one country doesn't mean it will work in another. Take the NFL American football, which has had millions pumped in to it over here and has it taken off? Because it doesn't fit our sporting needs. Has soccer in Austrailia taken off, and is it regularly pulling the same gates as the NRL? No, it is a different culture down under so we should not do what the Aussies do, as it will never guarantee success here as it is an entirely different market and situation. We need to do what is right for us in this country.

Edited by Pride & Heritage, 01 July 2010 - 01:39 PM.


#82 dallymessenger

dallymessenger
  • Coach
  • 20,928 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 01:37 PM

QUOTE (Pride & Heritage @ Jul 1 2010, 02:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why does it need to be well funded? Why not just have 14 teams with the same budget and therefore almost guaranteeing that 1 team will not dominate for decades? Does the best sport have to be played by the absolute best and skillful players, or is the best sport played out by equally skilled teams? Is it better to watch say St. Helens with a team full of internationals from around the world stuffing say Castleford or Catalan by 60 points every week? Or would you rather watch a game like the recent Huddersfield and Hull KR which was in doubt until the lasty kick of the game? No contest IMO

Why do we have this obsession with Austrailia it is there national sport, so it is an entirely different situation and just because something works in one country doesn't mean it will work in another. Take the NFL American football, which has had millions pumped in to it here and has it taken off? Has soccer in Austrailia taken off and is it regularly pulling the same gates as the NRL? No, it is a different culture down under so we should not do what the Aussies do, as it will never guarantee success here as it is an entirely different market and situation. We need to do what is right for us in this country.


yeah lets have english RL stay a small sport ignored by the major media because of forlorn notion the sport has as much money as soccer

the boss of sale was quoted as saying he feared for their clubs future if they were relegated. this in a sport with millions more than league.

if clubs cant get more than 800 to their home games that says how little people care about the game in their town

#83 Terry Mullaney

Terry Mullaney
  • Coach
  • 1,991 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 01:40 PM

QUOTE (Pride & Heritage @ Jul 1 2010, 01:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
To all of the pro franchise people. I can see your argument about the promoted team not being competitive enough etc. but this has been caused by the larger clubs in SL who are running the game getting away with feathering there own nests for years. Remember Gateshull and Shuddersfield mergers, the rules have been consistantly bent to favour the select few since the inception of SL. Why should the bigger clubs get 2 votes to 1??? Could you imagine it in any other walk of life? Like a general election for example? The game is a farce at the moment and needs to be run independently of the likes of Mr Hetherington at Leeds with vested interests in what decisions are made for the game as a whole.

Why not set a pool of cash aside from all of the SL clubs to finance the promotion of a team? Like the parachute payment made to Castleford when they were last relegated, but this time give the newly promoted team the cash to be competitive? Surely that is the best solution and will without doubt strengthen that club for the future. The greater the number of strong teams in the game the better the game will be!

Surely the answer is to make the gap between the top clubs and the bottom smaller not bigger, which has been the case for years. Yes, I'm a Batley supporter, a very small club, but it isn't that long ago we drew with St. Helens in the Challenge Cup and would have won it if it wasn't for a last minute touchline goal by Bobby Goulding to get them the draw. Can you imagine that happening in any sort of competition now between SL and the CH's? Don't you think that is why the attendances for the Challenge cup have dropped? Who the hell wants to watch a game where the result is a dead cert before a ball is kicked? Is the game any better for this gulf in class between all of the divisions? I know the arguement for continually strengthening the top tier is to make the international GB/England team stronger, but has this happened in the last 20 years? Can any of you give me any proof that this has worked in any way? I think not, we are no closer now than we were in the 80's to toppling the Aussies, it could even be argued after the last internationals we are now further away than we were. Have we even looked like winning a Tri Nations tournament or World Cup in the last few years?

How good is it for the sport to be dominated by 2 or 3 clubs for decades on end, is that an exciting prospect for enticing new fans to a minority sport? Wigan dominated in the 80's, Leeds and St. Helens almost exclusively ever since with the exception of an odd couple of years of Bradford doing well? We need to get the balance right and have 14 equally matched teams in SL with promotion and relegation brought back in, giving everyone something to play for, and without doubt this boys club smokescreen, known as the franchised system has to be scrapped. Please pull your heads out of the sand and realise that this franchise system is just a smokescreen to protect the few at the cost of all the others! It is not good for the game. That is the only way to strengthen the international game, by making players play to the best of their ability every week, as you would have a few stars in all of the SL clubs rather than the likes of Leeds, St. Helens etc. dominating the talent pool with enough strength in depth to fill 2 1st teams capable of finishing in the top 4 of SL.

If you think that the game is balanced at the moment, and everyone has a good chance of winning, I ask you how many of you would be willing to bet 100 on Salford beating Leeds in a couple of weeks time? Not as many as would bet 100 on Leeds winning I'll bet!

Bang on my friend. Time to give us our game back.
Wedding Films For The Discerning by Picture House
Free Showreel DVD On Request

http://www.pictureho...ingfilms.co.uk/

#84 Dave T

Dave T
  • Coach
  • 15,831 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 01:44 PM

The fact is we had P&R for a decent spell, and it hasn't exactly set the world on fire, so trying something new (which is actually P&R over 3 years rather than 1 year) is worth a go in my book.

#85 Pride & Heritage

Pride & Heritage
  • Coach
  • 464 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 02:03 PM

QUOTE (dallymessenger @ Jul 1 2010, 02:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
yeah lets have english RL stay a small sport ignored by the major media because of forlorn notion the sport has as much money as soccer

the boss of sale was quoted as saying he feared for their clubs future if they were relegated. this in a sport with millions more than league.

if clubs cant get more than 800 to their home games that says how little people care about the game in their town


But you are missing whole point, the game is a joke because too many results are easy to predict, and too many teams are not in with a shout of winning anything and never will because of the closed shop mentality. Most of the teams in the country have absolutely no dream to chase. The gap gets wider every year between top and bottom and you could ask what is the point of playing at all, if you are guaranteeing no matter how good a team is on the field that they can never play in the top division because you are smaller club and therefore can never strive to be any better?

Sport is about uncertainty and shock results. Having a dream to chase that no matter how small you are you can reach the top and be the best in the country. We do not have that in the RFL and that is why we are a minority sport. How perocial is it that best team doesn't get in because there face doesn't fit. If football was run by that logic Blackpool , Burnley and Bolton would never be admitted in to the Premiership. Would that make football a better sport? No of course it wouldn't, you'd have a situation like the Scottish FA where eventually you'll just have 2 teams who are the only ones left with anything to play for in a few years, like Rangers and Celtic. Because everyone else is so financially far away from the big 2 that the competition is decided before a ball is kicked. The 2 good teams will slowly get worse year on year because the opposition is getting worse due to a lack of interest by fans of smaller clubs who are sick of knowing what will happen prior to seeing the game, and therefore less investment will be made by smaller clubs in players as there are less fans. It is just a downward spiral that will eventually kill the game off. That is what the Aussies realised with there franchise system, they made the playing field even for all of the teams in the league. Ensuring all clubs keep investing in talent as there is always the dream to chase as all teams can only spend the same amount of money as each other, and there are can be no Leeds, Wigan or Saints dominating the game just because they happen to have more cash than the others at any particular time.

Has Scottish international football improved since the 2 club domination? When was the last time they qualified for a World Cup/European Championship?

In short t was the Aussie salary cap which has sorted the game out and kept it competitive, not the franchise closed shop system.

Edited by Pride & Heritage, 01 July 2010 - 02:20 PM.


#86 Terry Mullaney

Terry Mullaney
  • Coach
  • 1,991 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 02:15 PM

QUOTE (dallymessenger @ Jul 1 2010, 02:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
if clubs cant get more than 800 to their home games that says how little people care about the game in their town

So which ambitious Championship clubs can't get more than 800 to their home games?
Wedding Films For The Discerning by Picture House
Free Showreel DVD On Request

http://www.pictureho...ingfilms.co.uk/

#87 Dave T

Dave T
  • Coach
  • 15,831 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 02:19 PM

Whilst you make some valid points in some of your other posts, I do need to pick you up on some things here:

QUOTE (Pride & Heritage @ Jul 1 2010, 03:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But you are missing whole point, the game is a joke because too many results are easy to predict, and too many teams are not in with a shout of winning anything and never will because of the closed shop mentality.

The results are no more predictable nowadays than they have ever been, even when we had P&R. We have seen bottom teams win at top teams this year, just as every other year. Nothing to do with a closed shop.

QUOTE
Most of the teams in the country have absolutely no dream to chase. The gap gets wider every year between top and bottom and you could ask what is the point of playing at all, if you are guaranteeing no matter how good a team is on the field that they can never play in the top division because you are smaller club and therefore can never strive to be any better?
Why do teams have no dream to chase? That dream may be a bit harder to achieve now (ie you need to build up your club rather than going for a sh!t or bust approach on the field).

All clubs are eligible for SL if they get the facilities and setup right, that hasn't changed, however has become more difficult to achieve.


#88 shrek

shrek
  • Coach
  • 5,964 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 02:27 PM

Personally I'd hold up the English Premier league in soccer as a great example as to why P&R is a very risky business, it creates unsustainable clubs, 3 of which will drop down each year and a good number of those must go into administration and it can't be long before we see the first liquidation.

On the flip side, we deal with much smaller numbers in Rugby, so if we could ever get the the Championship to a point clubs were spending 60 to 70% of the lower spending clubs in Super League on salaries and playing out of decent facilities with solid foundations I'd love to see P&R back. At the moment though I just don't see it as being viable.

#89 Pride & Heritage

Pride & Heritage
  • Coach
  • 464 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 03:03 PM

QUOTE (Dave T @ Jul 1 2010, 03:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Whilst you make some valid points in some of your other posts, I do need to pick you up on some things here:

The results are no more predictable nowadays than they have ever been, even when we had P&R. We have seen bottom teams win at top teams this year, just as every other year. Nothing to do with a closed shop.

Why do teams have no dream to chase? That dream may be a bit harder to achieve now (ie you need to build up your club rather than going for a sh!t or bust approach on the field).

All clubs are eligible for SL if they get the facilities and setup right, that hasn't changed, however has become more difficult to achieve.


So Celtic got in to SL based on facilities at The Brewery Field, infrastructure and youth talent, or set up as you call it?

The inter divisional games have all become a joke other than the Barrow v Cas cup game, the others were settled by upwards of 40 points in the main between each of the 3 divisions, that is hardly competitive is it?

Brewery Field was a far worse ground than any I have ever visited in 30 years of watching rugby; McLaren Field, Bramley, even the current Barrow ground were like Wembley compared to that. But that was o.k. for them to get in. How many young players has Nobby played this year from the junior ranks of Celtic that was deemed good enough for them in their franchise application to SL? Not even mentioning the infrastructure that was so solid that the club moved 150 miles north in search of fans. They went bust and were bought out by a new company just like the reasons given to Widnes when there application was rejected, but were Crusaders/Celtic kicked out of the league or deducted points? No, they got to carry on regardless without punishment. How other than location can Celtic's application be deemed any better than either Leigh's, Widnes' or even Halifax's? When you look at fans, ground etc.
It is also things like that that make our game look a joke to the rest of sporting world, and why we struggle to get fans interested and national press coverage. I could go further and mention the expansion plans and relegation fiasco of Leigh and Gateshead last year too.

We know at Batley, as most of other Championship clubs do, that we will never get in to SL under the current regime. We earned the right, met the criteria as it was, as did Keighley in the same season only for the rules to be changed after the season had ended to stop us getting in. Hence, we know the dream of playing top flight rugby has gone along with upwards of half of our support, who then went to watch the Bulls, Rhino's and Huddersfield who were aloud to chase the dream to become the best, and none of whom have been seen again at the mount.

In regard to Sh!t or bust promotion campaigns, surely that is what the salary cap is for? To ensure that there can no longer be a sh!t or bust approach. I thought it was designed to make sure clubs could not overspend on players and therefore down to sensible investment and infrastructure of the club to ensure they are the best in the league?

Edited by Pride & Heritage, 01 July 2010 - 03:06 PM.


#90 Pride & Heritage

Pride & Heritage
  • Coach
  • 464 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 03:15 PM

QUOTE (shrek @ Jul 1 2010, 03:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
On the flip side, we deal with much smaller numbers in Rugby, so if we could ever get the the Championship to a point clubs were spending 60 to 70% of the lower spending clubs in Super League on salaries and playing out of decent facilities with solid foundations I'd love to see P&R back. At the moment though I just don't see it as being viable.


That is kind of my point Shrek, we need to get the smaller clubs up by investing in them, to get them to a state where the gap between all of the divisions in minimal. That will mean taking Sky money etc. off the SL teams and investing it in the smaller clubs, which won't happen because the SL clubs have 2 votes to 1. But that is the best future for the sport IMO. We also need everyone in each division to have the same budget as each other. That would mean cutting the salary cap in SL to say 1M or whatever the likes of Celtic/Cas/Salford can realistically afford.

#91 Dave T

Dave T
  • Coach
  • 15,831 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 03:36 PM

QUOTE (Pride & Heritage @ Jul 1 2010, 04:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So Celtic got in to SL based on facilities at The Brewery Field, infrastructure and youth talent, or set up as you call it?
There are quite a few clubs that got in at this first stage that don't necessarily have the right setup. Most clubs who applied for a license got a C grade. It was then up to the RFL to decide which clubs got in, and it is clear that Crusaders had a big advantage by being in a promotional area.

QUOTE
The inter divisional games have all become a joke other than the Barrow v Cas cup game, the others were settled by upwards of 40 points in the main between each of the 3 divisions, that is hardly competitive is it?
What do you expect, they are between teams in different divisions, this has pretty much always been the case!

QUOTE
Brewery Field...
I'm not here to defend Crusaders, this has been discussed to death.


QUOTE
We know at Batley, as most of other Championship clubs do, that we will never get in to SL under the current regime. We earned the right, met the criteria as it was, as did Keighley in the same season only for the rules to be changed after the season had ended to stop us getting in. Hence, we know the dream of playing top flight rugby has gone along with upwards of half of our support, who then went to watch the Bulls, Rhino's and Huddersfield who were aloud to chase the dream to become the best, and none of whom have been seen again at the mount.
Would it do Batley any good going up to SL in their current form? What kind of investment could they attract in SL? If they can get investment and the interest is there, then why are they any different to Fev, Barrow, Widnes and Leigh who do have ambitions of promotion. If you are saying you can't get to their level, then, well I'm sorry, you don't deserve a SL spot.


QUOTE
In regard to Sh!t or bust promotion campaigns, surely that is what the salary cap is for? To ensure that there can no longer be a sh!t or bust approach. I thought it was designed to make sure clubs could not overspend on players and therefore down to sensible investment and infrastructure of the club to ensure they are the best in the league?
Even though the SC has been reduced, it is still too high for many clubs, as the income just doesn't cover it.

In a P&R situation you then have to increase from around 300k to a minimum of three or four times that in just a few months, and then if relegation comes back down to the 300k in a short time. So basically in a period of around 18mnths a business is expected to increase it's spend at least five-fold. IMO the clubs need to be in a strong positon before they can commit to this kind of investment and growth.

Batley know what they have to do, if they are not a big enough club to do that, I'm not sure what complaints they can have.


#92 shrek

shrek
  • Coach
  • 5,964 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 03:39 PM

QUOTE (Pride & Heritage @ Jul 1 2010, 04:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That is kind of my point Shrek, we need to get the smaller clubs up by investing in them, to get them to a state where the gap between all of the divisions in minimal. That will mean taking Sky money etc. off the SL teams and investing it in the smaller clubs, which won't happen because the SL clubs have 2 votes to 1. But that is the best future for the sport IMO. We also need everyone in each division to have the same budget as each other. That would mean cutting the salary cap in SL to say 1M or whatever the likes of Celtic/Cas/Salford can realistically afford.


This will be were we differ then!

I don't see the benefit to the sport at all by cutting the salary cap, its down to those who are hovering around the 1 million mark to pull themselves up, if they can't there is only so long there place is sustainable in the top division.

I think the Championship clubs needs to make the difference up independently of the Super League, be it through there own TV deal or other ventures. Thursday night Rugby seems quite popular in the viewing figures from what snippets I've seen of the BARB ratings, it must strengthen the hand of clubs at that level when negotiations take place.

#93 Keith T

Keith T
  • Coach
  • 9,004 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 04:21 PM

QUOTE (Pride & Heritage @ Jul 1 2010, 01:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
To all of the pro franchise people. I can see your argument about the promoted team not being competitive enough etc. but this has been caused by the larger clubs in SL who are running the game getting away with feathering there own nests for years. Remember Gateshull and Shuddersfield mergers, the rules have been consistantly bent to favour the select few since the inception of SL. Why should the bigger clubs get 2 votes to 1??? Could you imagine it in any other walk of life? Like a general election for example? The game is a farce at the moment and needs to be run independently of the likes of Mr Hetherington at Leeds with vested interests in what decisions are made for the game as a whole.

Why not set a pool of cash aside from all of the SL clubs to finance the promotion of a team? Like the parachute payment made to Castleford when they were last relegated, but this time give the newly promoted team the cash to be competitive? Surely that is the best solution and will without doubt strengthen that club for the future. The greater the number of strong teams in the game the better the game will be!

Surely the answer is to make the gap between the top clubs and the bottom smaller not bigger, which has been the case for years. Yes, I'm a Batley supporter, a very small club, but it isn't that long ago we drew with St. Helens in the Challenge Cup and would have won it if it wasn't for a last minute touchline goal by Bobby Goulding to get them the draw. Can you imagine that happening in any sort of competition now between SL and the CH's? Don't you think that is why the attendances for the Challenge cup have dropped? Who the hell wants to watch a game where the result is a dead cert before a ball is kicked? Is the game any better for this gulf in class between all of the divisions? I know the arguement for continually strengthening the top tier is to make the international GB/England team stronger, but has this happened in the last 20 years? Can any of you give me any proof that this has worked in any way? I think not, we are no closer now than we were in the 80's to toppling the Aussies, it could even be argued after the last internationals we are now further away than we were. Have we even looked like winning a Tri Nations tournament or World Cup in the last few years?

How good is it for the sport to be dominated by 2 or 3 clubs for decades on end, is that an exciting prospect for enticing new fans to a minority sport? Wigan dominated in the 80's, Leeds and St. Helens almost exclusively ever since with the exception of an odd couple of years of Bradford doing well? We need to get the balance right and have 14 equally matched teams in SL with promotion and relegation brought back in, giving everyone something to play for, and without doubt this boys club smokescreen, known as the franchised system has to be scrapped. Please pull your heads out of the sand and realise that this franchise system is just a smokescreen to protect the few at the cost of all the others! It is not good for the game. That is the only way to strengthen the international game, by making players play to the best of their ability every week, as you would have a few stars in all of the SL clubs rather than the likes of Leeds, St. Helens etc. dominating the talent pool with enough strength in depth to fill 2 1st teams capable of finishing in the top 4 of SL.

If you think that the game is balanced at the moment, and everyone has a good chance of winning, I ask you how many of you would be willing to bet 100 on Salford beating Leeds in a couple of weeks time? Not as many as would bet 100 on Leeds winning I'll bet!



Spot on mate. That old saying "there's none so blind as those that don't want to see" couldn't be more truer. Thousands of people have just walked away from the game altogether in west Cumbria because people don't see any future for the game as a spectator sport in this area any more. Unlike other areas where they can go and watch a differnt SL club every week they merely find other pusuits here.

I remember when .............................

"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimension, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave Hadfield - Independent 25th August 1996.


#94 l'angelo mysterioso

l'angelo mysterioso
  • Coach
  • 42,619 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 04:23 PM

QUOTE (Terry Mullaney @ Jul 1 2010, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I give up. Your last post bears out all that I've said. Attendances were lower generally then than they are now so logically clubs such as Rovers could expect proportionate increases if allowed access to SL. John Kear has realised that Licensing is not the way forward and good on him for admitting he was mistaken. Thanks for your efforts in supplying the figures.


as you said it is all relative
rovers had everything you require to be amongst the top attended clubs-rekegation battles, cup winning but they were nowhere near.
their crowds didn't get bigger towards the end of the season, which one would have thought they would.
I suspect the voice of the vested interest in Kear's comments.
WELCOME TO THE ROYSTON VASEY SUPER LEAGUE 2015
Keeping it local

#95 Keith T

Keith T
  • Coach
  • 9,004 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 04:31 PM

As the Chief Executive of the RFL commented, "At a time when other major spectator sports are facing falling attendances, it is most encouraging to see our gates rising significantly once again. This surely demonstrates that however hard the times, people will always turn up to support a game which offers skill, excitement, commitment, self-discipline, and value for money.

However we musn't be complacent. Much remains to be done and it is particularly pleasingto find that many Rugby League clubs are at last paying attention to the vital need to improve spectators' facilities and comfort. The battle for people's time, attention, and money has never been tougher but the latest figures confirm my conviction that our game is marching inexorably forward to the ultimate goal, which will see Rugby League firmly established as a leading national spectator sport during the course of the current decade".

Mmmmmmmmm.

I remember when .............................

"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimension, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave Hadfield - Independent 25th August 1996.


#96 l'angelo mysterioso

l'angelo mysterioso
  • Coach
  • 42,619 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 04:51 PM

QUOTE (LOWFIELD @ Jul 1 2010, 11:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Its like having a conversation with a young child this is. The crowds Fev got in 83 is irrelevant maybe if there was no relegation they would of been lower. Im saying the last 3 crowds Cas have had would of been significantly higher had relegation been at stake probably by 2k a game and at 18 a throw that is around 100,000 in just 3 games. The licencing system is costing the game millions per season. Im also been very conservative with my 2k estimate, as the game is money orientated it wont be long before the system is scrapped and 2 divisions are introduced

that season the majority of clubs had nothing to play for. Hull FC dominated the sport. There were no play offs either.

Rovers with their cup run, and their relegation battles, which we are told boost attendances, had lower crowds than the clubs above them, significantly so. Their crowds didn't show an increase when the season came to a climax for the club on two fronts.
WELCOME TO THE ROYSTON VASEY SUPER LEAGUE 2015
Keeping it local

#97 l'angelo mysterioso

l'angelo mysterioso
  • Coach
  • 42,619 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 04:55 PM

QUOTE (Keith T @ Jul 1 2010, 05:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Spot on mate. That old saying "there's none so blind as those that don't want to see" c

To suggest that people who don't share your views fall into this category, says a lot about about the depth and breadth of your own vision. How does merely harbouring such thoughts and attempting to back them up equate to blindness

Edited by l'angelo mysterioso, 01 July 2010 - 05:41 PM.

WELCOME TO THE ROYSTON VASEY SUPER LEAGUE 2015
Keeping it local

#98 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 15,397 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 05:32 PM

The fact that we're still having this argument three years down the line surely illustrates that large numbers of RL fans are unhappy with the type of game franchising has produced - a game with no "edge" to it.
How would it be if at Wimbledon they'd said to Venus Williams's (or Federer for that matter) opponent, "Sorry kid, but Venus is a regular here, so until you win a few more semi finals we're not letting you play the big one, we're letting her (him) play it instead" Effectively that's what franchising does.

"This is a very wealthy country, money is no object" D. Cameron February 2014


#99 Pride & Heritage

Pride & Heritage
  • Coach
  • 464 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 05:33 PM

QUOTE (shrek @ Jul 1 2010, 04:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This will be were we differ then!

I don't see the benefit to the sport at all by cutting the salary cap, its down to those who are hovering around the 1 million mark to pull themselves up, if they can't there is only so long there place is sustainable in the top division.

I think the Championship clubs needs to make the difference up independently of the Super League, be it through there own TV deal or other ventures. Thursday night Rugby seems quite popular in the viewing figures from what snippets I've seen of the BARB ratings, it must strengthen the hand of clubs at that level when negotiations take place.


Supposing only 3 clubs can actually meet the salary cap of 1.6 million without risking going bust. Just supposing the Ch clubs cannot increase there funding, what then? Are you are saying there is no place for any of them and you would kick the other 11 teams out of SL who cannot afford to spend 1.6M? Are you advocating teams stretching themselves to what is beyond financially stable, leaving them likey to go in to administration and eventually going bust. Leaving an elite 3 to do battle each week, exciting stuff, I can't wait for that.

In a round about way you are saying the clubs are bigger than the game itself, by allowing them to outspend their competitors. What I'm trying to get at is; the game needs to take a step backwards in reducing the cap and guaranteeing the future of all the clubs thus making the playing field as level as possible for all, which in turn will increase the competiveness of the game, which should see crowds go through the roof as there will be no more Wigan v Catalan type games with a 60 point margin almost guaranteed even before kick off. Where fans don't see the point in going and paying on the door as the result is a formality.

Edited by Pride & Heritage, 01 July 2010 - 05:34 PM.


#100 Keith T

Keith T
  • Coach
  • 9,004 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 05:40 PM

QUOTE (l'angelo mysterioso @ Jul 1 2010, 05:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
To suggest that people who don't share your views fall into this category, says a lot about about the depth and breadth of your vision. Or maybe these people are using 'twisted logic' or are a 'disgrace', for merely harbouring such thoughts and attempting to back them up.


And you also speak for everyone who share your "twisted" view I take it. SL is a closed shop and the majority of fans that are already in it want it to stay that way in order that some of their weak clubs, both financially and on the filed, can stay there and pick up the nice fat cheques from Sky. Many couldn't give a toss about what is happening outside their tight little circle. How much depth and vision is that?

I remember when .............................

"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimension, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave Hadfield - Independent 25th August 1996.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users