Jump to content

Recommended Posts

'Combined Nations All Stars' - really?  I am not discussing the concept here but the allocated name.  I find it dull and easy to forget.  Is it better then 'the rest of the world' or how about 'World All Stars' or even just 'the world'?  'England takes on The World'  would be a great headline!

I  certainly think the word 'world' should be in there as a verbal link to the WORLD cup and the subliminal impression it gives of RL as a global sport.

Or do you love it and can't wait to get your 'Combined Nations All Stars' bobble hat and keyring?!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wiggler said:

'Combined Nations All Stars' - really?  I am not discussing the concept here but the allocated name.  I find it dull and easy to forget.  Is it better then 'the rest of the world' or how about 'World All Stars' or even just 'the world'?  'England takes on The World'  would be a great headline!

I  certainly think the word 'world' should be in there as a verbal link to the WORLD cup and the subliminal impression it gives of RL as a global sport.

Or do you love it and can't wait to get your 'Combined Nations All Stars' bobble hat and keyring?!!

I don't mind it. It is a one-off event anyway.

I am glad they did not use the word "world" like you suggest as I find thst would be misleading. If NRL players are not being considered, then it is hardly a 'world all stars' team. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...