Dave T Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 34 minutes ago, Dunbar said: Not in this instance. The time allowed for a challenge would have elapsed and the VR can't go back to before the last play the ball was executed when checking on a try. Can a Captain's Challenge be made for an incident where the ref has made no decision, I.. E play on? Or is it only when the ref has stopped the game and made a decision? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidM Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 1 minute ago, Dave T said: Can a Captain's Challenge be made for an incident where the ref has made no decision, I.. E play on? Or is it only when the ref has stopped the game and made a decision? Yes the latter 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 It wasn’t the most blatant knock on. 99% of people watching didn’t see it in real time etc. The Captain’s Challenge wouldn’t have impacted the decision as you can’t go back past the PTB just like the current VR. A player could shout and rant as much as they like but there are much more likely to end up in the bin than any change to the decision Also the Captain’s Challenge relies on the game stopping for a referee’s decision so you can’t just challenge when it’s a “play on”. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunbar Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 16 minutes ago, Dave T said: Can a Captain's Challenge be made for an incident where the ref has made no decision, I.. E play on? Or is it only when the ref has stopped the game and made a decision? Only when the game stops. Which is the reason why some teams a year or so back were deliberately giving away a penalty after what they perceived as an opposition mistake so they could make a challenge. But that was clamped down and players would have been binned for a professional foul. 1 1 "The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby. "If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now