-
Posts
47,841 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
334
Dave T last won the day on July 2
Dave T had the most liked content!
About Dave T
- Birthday 10/08/1978
Member Profile
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Scotland, originally from Wire
Recent Profile Visitors
Dave T's Achievements
39.3k
Reputation
-
One of the challenges around time wasting is that you struggle to get much sympathy when as a tackler youve spent all the rest of the match making the play the ball as slow as possible.
-
Isn't it something vague like 'without delay' or something?
-
I do think people just need to chill. We dont need to kneejerk just because some people don't like a ptb taking 10 seconds instead of 3.
-
SL clubs look to reinstate Nigel Wood.
Dave T replied to The 4 of Us's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Indeed. Its almost like its the perfect t argument as to why the clubs shouldn't be the ones deciding stuff like this. -
Great stuff. But jeez, that's an ugly graphic in that post.
-
SL clubs look to reinstate Nigel Wood.
Dave T replied to The 4 of Us's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Well, the last person who had proper control was Wood. There was an owners coup when he ousted them. -
SL clubs look to reinstate Nigel Wood.
Dave T replied to The 4 of Us's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Yup, its been a problem forever, but the evidence against it is coming thick and fast right now. I dont even necessarily think its just an 'I'm alright Jack' problem, running things so complex by committee is impossible. -
SL clubs look to reinstate Nigel Wood.
Dave T replied to The 4 of Us's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Club owners come and go. -
London Broncos (Merged Threads)
Dave T replied to Magic XIII's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Double post -
London Broncos (Merged Threads)
Dave T replied to Magic XIII's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Hmm. You can't pull people for fiction and then deny what actually happened in 1995/6. London were parachuted into the new top flight for 1996. They did not earn on-field promotion, them and PSG benefited from being handpicked, everyone else was based on league rankings. Now, I dont agree with the poster you are replying to, and am more in your camp that London needs far more support than they have. But we dont need to claim they werent parachuted into SL (or given overseas players dispensation). I would argue that is the case for many areas, I notice you ask for London to receive the same patience and support that has been extended elsewhere - im not sure i see much patience and support for any clubs, we have a long history of throwing clubs under the bus. Catalans benefited from being handpicked, and protection for the first year or two, but outside of that nothing really. Let's be honest, if they were as bad as what London put on the field, theyd be left to the lower division. Catalans first few years was fine, but after that they've been left to themselves, and let's be honest, the terms of their participation are worse than other clubs. So we shouldn't really be looking for London to have similar support to others, we should be looking for expansion/special strategic clubs like this to have a hel of a lot more support than they have ever had. -
Yeah, its ok, but it looks a little Samoa-y
-
SL clubs look to reinstate Nigel Wood.
Dave T replied to The 4 of Us's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
If I was IMG I'd be getting out of here tbh. -
SL clubs look to reinstate Nigel Wood.
Dave T replied to The 4 of Us's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Yes. History does rather suggest that we need a strong leadership team who will make decisions without being micromanaged by a committee of clubs. -
I think the RFL are pretty clear about what you can't do and why, and I think its really simple to never be penalised for this in your whole career, and I'd say 99.9% of players never will. Interestingly, I think Horne actually slowed it down more with his mucking about!
-
TBH, it looks to me like they have just looked at the incidents and have rather accepted that Martin's was very little: "The panel concluded that this incident does not meet the criteria for Unnecessary Contact as per the regulations, describing the contact as “de minimis” meaning virtually nothing"