johnh1 Posted May 27, 2015 Author Share Posted May 27, 2015 Ian Henderson cleared to play after the committee accepted his plea that he ''doesn't play for Salford''. Brilliant. Do you think Gareth Hock would have got away with what he did last week if he was still playing for Salford? I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red John Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Thank Christ for that. Yes, who was it who cited him and why? Stevie Wonder. Don't know why. Adam Walne has received a 3 match ban, apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnh1 Posted May 27, 2015 Author Share Posted May 27, 2015 Stevie Wonder. Don't know why. Adam Walne has received a 3 match ban, apparently. Quite. As for Adam Walne, I saw the game and don't recall anything untoward that he did. As for other players from other teams, that's quite another matter. This witch hunt against Salford players needs to stop and stop soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
binosh Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Richie Myler wrote a letter into Red Hall defending Patterson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ELBOWSEYE Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Richie Myler wrote a letter into Red Hall defending Patterson.still suffering concussion then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnh1 Posted May 27, 2015 Author Share Posted May 27, 2015 still suffering concussion then If that is so, then respect for Richie Myler. But it was as plain as day that it was an accident. Why should he have to write to Red Hall? And what would have happened if he hadn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweaty craiq Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Richie Myler wrote a letter into Red Hall defending Patterson. That gets him a ban in the Champ, Emmitt was up for foul mouthing the linesman his witness to his innocence was the Batley player - result 2 game ban. The club asked why certain players on Sky live games were not cited, not relevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave T Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Paterson found not guilty. Now perhaps the person who referred him should be referred for wasting the committee's time. I think when you read the submission it is fair enough and understandable why he was referred, but I think common sense has prevailed. The only bit I disagreed with was Paterson's/Harris' claim that this kind of collision is common where people are offloading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.