Jump to content

What is this all about?


Recommended Posts

Posted

From the Disciplinary

 

Details of Charge / Reason for NFA:
Player steals ball when player breaks line. Sin bin sufficient.     

 

Since when was that a penalty, let alone a sin bin? They even got the player’s name wrong.

 

 


Posted
16 minutes ago, johnh1 said:

From the Disciplinary

 

Details of Charge / Reason for NFA:
Player steals ball when player breaks line. Sin bin sufficient.     

 

Since when was that a penalty, let alone a sin bin? They even got the player’s name wrong.

 

 

I'd assume the ball was stolen after the tackle was complete to prevent advantage from the break which is, as stated in the minutes, a 'professional foul' punishment for which is a sin-binning.

Posted

I assume that was Chris Atkin (!)

It was deemed as a professional foul for reefing the ball after the tackle was complete (while Salford was retreating after a breakaway move by KR).

Posted

I thought this thread might be a deep and meaningful reflection on the meaning of life … but no it’s about a player stealing the ball 

Posted
5 hours ago, johnh1 said:

So I ask again, why didn’t the disciplinary state what the actual offence was? 

It was a professional foul to allow the defending team to get back on side.. I vaguely remeber from my childhood at the early 90s world cup australia player did similar and got sin binned (after a GB break) a 1uick play the ball and GB would have won the semi..

Yellow card for at least the last 30 years..

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.