Jump to content

Flanagan looking at long ban


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, gazza77 said:

8 matches feels about right to me, however this example does demonstrate a wild inconsistency in punishments for similar offences. 

Yeah I agree. They seem to hand out long suspensions for specific people/incidents such as Hock, Acton etc but it doesn’t seem there is any consistency in some of the longer ones. Any precedence doesn’t seem to be applied 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


44 minutes ago, DoubleD said:

Yeah I agree. They seem to hand out long suspensions for specific people/incidents such as Hock, Acton etc but it doesn’t seem there is any consistency in some of the longer ones. Any precedence doesn’t seem to be applied 

Sam Burgess got 2 weeks, although not SL.

With the way the claim blame society works, what say these could be ever referred to in the future, for several reasons?

Out of all the things to do, its a despicable thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tim Streets tache said:

Hes always been a thick chav has George Flanagan.

He has a long history of dodgy behaviour going back to his academy days

Totally unacceptable.....a pathetic cheap shot...like I mean who would even think of doing that during a game?....8 games minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.