Jump to content


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Buderus cops a 1 match ban


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

#1 Lee

Lee
  • Coach
  • 5,115 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:36 PM


Leeds will be without hooker Danny Buderus for their Engage Super League semi-final on Saturday week because of suspension.

The former Newcastle Knights and Australia player was given a one-match ban for a "spear" tackle on Paul Prescott in Sunday's play-off win over Wigan at the DW Stadium.


http://www.sportingl...GBYL_Leeds.html
A lot of Yorkshiremen believe that when God created the world, he made it with perfect balance.
He balanced the hot areas with the cold areas. the dry areas with the wet areas.
And, in creating Yorkshire, he created the most glorious place on earth - full of majestic beauty and sporting giants.........and for balance he created....... Lancashire.

#2 Old Frightful

Old Frightful
  • Coach
  • 12,740 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:42 PM

You sure Lee?

He does play for Leeds doesn't he?

How many other Danny Buderuses are out there?

          NO BUTS IT'S GOT TO BE BUTTER......                                 Z1N2MybzplQR6XBrwB9egniMH8xqYQ5s.jpg                                                                                                                     


#3 Lee

Lee
  • Coach
  • 5,115 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:46 PM

QUOTE (Old Frightful @ Sep 14 2010, 06:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You sure Lee?

He does play for Leeds doesn't he?

How many other Danny Buderuses are out there?



Would i lie to you mate

No doubt it should have been 6-8


A lot of Yorkshiremen believe that when God created the world, he made it with perfect balance.
He balanced the hot areas with the cold areas. the dry areas with the wet areas.
And, in creating Yorkshire, he created the most glorious place on earth - full of majestic beauty and sporting giants.........and for balance he created....... Lancashire.

#4 my missus

my missus
  • Coach
  • 4,791 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:46 PM

QUOTE (Old Frightful @ Sep 14 2010, 06:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You sure Lee?

He does play for Leeds doesn't he?

How many other Danny Buderuses are out there?

whats the chance he appeals and gets off. wink.gif

What does it mean
This tearjerking scene
Beamed into my home
That it moves me so much
Why all the fuss
It's only two humans being.


#5 dkw

dkw
  • Workington
  • 4,526 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:50 PM

Wasnt there 2 spear tackles in that game?

#6 Wendall

Wendall
  • Banned
  • 6,758 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:52 PM

Did Joel T get anything for his kick?



#7 Lee

Lee
  • Coach
  • 5,115 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:52 PM

QUOTE (dkw @ Sep 14 2010, 06:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wasnt there 2 spear tackles in that game?


Not according to the RFL or the match reviewer




A lot of Yorkshiremen believe that when God created the world, he made it with perfect balance.
He balanced the hot areas with the cold areas. the dry areas with the wet areas.
And, in creating Yorkshire, he created the most glorious place on earth - full of majestic beauty and sporting giants.........and for balance he created....... Lancashire.

#8 dkw

dkw
  • Workington
  • 4,526 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:54 PM

QUOTE (Lee @ Sep 14 2010, 06:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Not according to the RFL or the match reviewer

Might be my mistake, I thought I could remember there being 2 dangerous tackles.

#9 shrek

shrek
  • Coach
  • 5,842 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:55 PM

QUOTE (dkw @ Sep 14 2010, 06:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wasnt there 2 spear tackles in that game?


To be fair I think you'll find some Wigan fans were very quick to acknowledge that in the Wigan v Leeds thread, Mr Albert was very inconstant and whilst not affecting the result, did to me look to out of his depth.

I haven't had the benefit of seeing it again, but it appeared on first viewing that both tackles were similar and should have been treated similar, I stand to be corrected by anyone who's had the benefit of seeing it slow-mo and from multiple angles.

#10 dkw

dkw
  • Workington
  • 4,526 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:57 PM

QUOTE (shrek @ Sep 14 2010, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
To be fair I think you'll find some Wigan fans were very quick to acknowledge that in the Wigan v Leeds thread, Mr Albert was very inconstant and whilst not affecting the result, did to me look to out of his depth.

I haven't had the benefit of seeing it again, but it appeared on first viewing that both tackles were similar and should have been treated similar, I stand to be corrected by anyone who's had the benefit of seeing it slow-mo and from multiple angles.

So there was another dangerous tackle? I thought there was one but cant remember the details.

#11 Lee

Lee
  • Coach
  • 5,115 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:58 PM

QUOTE (dkw @ Sep 14 2010, 06:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Might be my mistake, I thought I could remember there being 2 dangerous tackles.



There were 2, i was just pointing out one seems to have been "overlooked" shall we say


A lot of Yorkshiremen believe that when God created the world, he made it with perfect balance.
He balanced the hot areas with the cold areas. the dry areas with the wet areas.
And, in creating Yorkshire, he created the most glorious place on earth - full of majestic beauty and sporting giants.........and for balance he created....... Lancashire.

#12 dkw

dkw
  • Workington
  • 4,526 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:59 PM

QUOTE (Lee @ Sep 14 2010, 06:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There were 2, i was just pointing out one seems to have been "overlooked" shall we say

Ah right, so im guessing the other was by a Wigan player?

#13 Lee

Lee
  • Coach
  • 5,115 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 06:00 PM

QUOTE (Wendall @ Sep 14 2010, 06:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Did Joel T get anything for his kick?


8 were looked at but only Buderus was facing a charge

Law: 15.1(a) Detail: Kicking out Player reacts to opponent, lashes out making light contact with opponent, unnecessary and cynical behaviour

Decision No charge



A lot of Yorkshiremen believe that when God created the world, he made it with perfect balance.
He balanced the hot areas with the cold areas. the dry areas with the wet areas.
And, in creating Yorkshire, he created the most glorious place on earth - full of majestic beauty and sporting giants.........and for balance he created....... Lancashire.

#14 dkw

dkw
  • Workington
  • 4,526 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 06:02 PM

QUOTE (Lee @ Sep 14 2010, 07:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
8 were looked at but only Buderus was facing a charge

Law: 15.1(a) Detail: Kicking out Player reacts to opponent, lashes out making light contact with opponent, unnecessary and cynical behaviour

Decision No charge

Thats an absolutely ridiculous ruling.

#15 Lee

Lee
  • Coach
  • 5,115 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 06:03 PM

QUOTE (dkw @ Sep 14 2010, 06:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ah right, so im guessing the other was by a Wigan player?


Correct

In my humble opinion, id have said both were clumsy at best and neither warranted any further action, im just baffled how only one got charged





A lot of Yorkshiremen believe that when God created the world, he made it with perfect balance.
He balanced the hot areas with the cold areas. the dry areas with the wet areas.
And, in creating Yorkshire, he created the most glorious place on earth - full of majestic beauty and sporting giants.........and for balance he created....... Lancashire.

#16 StevieM13

StevieM13
  • Coach
  • 182 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 07:47 PM

QUOTE (dkw @ Sep 14 2010, 07:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thats an absolutely ridiculous ruling.


I completely agree. Tomkins was giving McGuire a facial with his bicep on the deck and McGuire reacted to that How can Buderus be charged with a spear tackle when it wasn't? I seem to remember Andy Coley putting in a much more dangerous tackle at Headingley earlier this season and nothing was done about it. The disciplinary is so inconsistent it is becoming a laughing stock.
If Radford has his ban dropped when he clearly set out to attack a player and inflict injury, then it is surely just a matter of appealing for Buderus to be clear to play.

#17 Carnie's Cover

Carnie's Cover
  • Coach
  • 241 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 08:10 PM

of the two tackles in my humble opinion Buderus was more serious as he dumped Prescott on hi head/neck and himself fell on prescott head/neck. I personally thought it was the worst spear tackle I have seen that I can remember.

the other tackle was a lifting of the legs and as a result the player landed on his head/neck without the pressure of the wigan players on top.

however it will take a player to break his neck before this sort of challenge is taken more seriously. should be a straight red everytime.

Edited by Carnie's Cover, 14 September 2010 - 08:13 PM.


#18 terrywebbisgod

terrywebbisgod
  • Coach
  • 8,140 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 08:32 PM

QUOTE (Carnie's Cover @ Sep 14 2010, 09:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
of the two tackles in my humble opinion Buderus was more serious as he dumped Prescott on hi head/neck and himself fell on prescott head/neck. I personally thought it was the worst spear tackle I have seen that I can remember.

the other tackle was a lifting of the legs and as a result the player landed on his head/neck without the pressure of the wigan players on top.

however it will take a player to break his neck before this sort of challenge is taken more seriously. should be a straight red everytime.

Surely a spear tackle is a spear tackle and both should have been treated in the same way.
Ridiculous ruling but that's what happens.
As for it being the worst you have ever seen, you are joking right,technically it wasn't even a spear tackle.
A spear tackle involves lifting a player and driving him into the ground head first.
Joel Tomkins escapes yet again. rolleyes.gif
Once you have tasted excellence,you cannot go back to mediocrity.

#19 1976PMJwires

1976PMJwires
  • Coach
  • 9,454 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 08:54 PM

QUOTE (Carnie's Cover @ Sep 14 2010, 09:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
of the two tackles in my humble opinion Buderus was more serious as he dumped Prescott on hi head/neck and himself fell on prescott head/neck. I personally thought it was the worst spear tackle I have seen that I can remember.

the other tackle was a lifting of the legs and as a result the player landed on his head/neck without the pressure of the wigan players on top.

however it will take a player to break his neck before this sort of challenge is taken more seriously. should be a straight red everytime.



spot the same........lifting of the legs and landing on the head wacko.gif wacko.gif wacko.gif only from wigan can you have that outlook. inter bred unsure.gif

#20 1976PMJwires

1976PMJwires
  • Coach
  • 9,454 posts

Posted 14 September 2010 - 08:56 PM

QUOTE (terrywebbisgod @ Sep 14 2010, 09:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Surely a spear tackle is a spear tackle and both should have been treated in the same way.
Ridiculous ruling but that's what happens.
As for it being the worst you have ever seen, you are joking right,technically it wasn't even a spear tackle.
A spear tackle involves lifting a player and driving him into the ground head first.

Joel Tomkins escapes yet again. rolleyes.gif


dirtiest player in super league.

wayne rooney well be paying for his services soon biggrin.gif tongue.gif




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users