Jump to content





EastLondonMike

Member Since 26 Jun 2007
Offline Last Active Today, 08:58 AM
-----

#3040911 London Broncos launch business club!

Posted by EastLondonMike on 04 December 2014 - 01:12 PM

Bronco's shirt launch is next week. On the 11th.. Launch is taking place in the shadows of Tower Bridge and combined with a meet and greet session i believe (in a nearby park/green), for those interested in going down.

No idea when they will have the kits for sale though.




#3038982 Burgess already bored, says Bath coach

Posted by EastLondonMike on 29 November 2014 - 03:26 PM

Jesus Christ. Those are the highlights?!..


#3038777 New Kits 2015

Posted by EastLondonMike on 28 November 2014 - 09:29 PM

Any jersey with an over sized crest (or in this case, castle), vintage photos and the like, printed within the background of a jersey is all wrong. Cheap looking and un-imaginative. Really disappointing effort from Errea.


#3035098 New Kits 2015

Posted by EastLondonMike on 19 November 2014 - 05:07 PM

Apologies Fev fans, but this did make me laugh and shake my head in equal measure.. Its been mentioned on this thread and another thread about clubs being professional in their attitude towards things like kit launches and how their presented etc..

From the Fev rovers website/webstore

The mens home shirt. Modelled by a woman. Photo taken in someones house (nice wallpaper border).

http://feathers.rlst...product/HOMEMEN

 




#3032065 New Kits 2015

Posted by EastLondonMike on 13 November 2014 - 01:34 PM

Nice Widnes jersey (though personally would have opted for black shorts).. and a real nice promo video. The new sponsor logo works very well with the kit design. Looks very good. Well done Widnes and O'Neills.




#3031331 New Kits 2015

Posted by EastLondonMike on 11 November 2014 - 03:54 PM

That Keighley crest is a cracker..




#3029652 New Kits 2015

Posted by EastLondonMike on 08 November 2014 - 04:50 PM

Whatever.


#3028370 BBC

Posted by EastLondonMike on 07 November 2014 - 08:38 AM

Some things never change. It seems to be a case of once England have played Australia, nothing else matters.. Nothing will change either until we ditch the BBC (something that should have been done long ago) and partner with another terrestrial TV broadcaster. Even if it costs us money, an increase in exposure and a partner who actually wants to push the sport would be worth it.




#3028125 league merging with union in South Africa?

Posted by EastLondonMike on 06 November 2014 - 05:23 PM

Is this still going on?.. i thought some sort of resolution with the bigoted Olympic committee was being sorted.

 

Another reason why a genuine IRLF is needed.

The last i heard the SARU had written to the Olympic committee and informed them RL was not anything to do with RU, but the imbecile in charge at the Olympic committee was refusing to budge on his stance.




#3027035 08/11/14 - New Zealand v England KO 7am GMT (Dunedin)

Posted by EastLondonMike on 04 November 2014 - 01:10 PM

lets not forget this time last week the team that HAD to be named on the tuesday wasn't the team that took to the pitch. McNamara might surprise us again and select Whitehead, who seems to be the one player over all others that the majority want to see get a chance. This time last week no one would have thought Sarginson would have been selected over Shenton.




#3025802 02/11/14 - Australia v England KO 5am (GMT)

Posted by EastLondonMike on 02 November 2014 - 07:31 PM

https://twitter.com/...919688055898113

This Photo.

Obviously Aussie fans are gonna say England got away with murder at the ruck, which I find laughable. Especially when you take into consideration the amount of late flops by the Aussie tacklers in three and four man tackles. If I'd had a pound for every time Cameron smith was third man in on a tackled player I'd be laughing!

I think the ref allowed England a certain amount of leeway in the ruck and therefore also allowed Australia to do what they wanted at the ruck in return. There tactics effected us more than ours effected them. I'd like to see how many NRL sides over the last couple of years went an entire second half without receiving a penalty..

The fact we had an Australian ref forced on us, at the very least the Video ref should have been English.


#3024971 02/11/14 - Australia v England KO 5am (GMT)

Posted by EastLondonMike on 02 November 2014 - 07:07 AM

Cheated. Video refs ruling that the ball was bouncing up was disgusting.

When that went to the video ref there was no way in the world it was gonna be given. Absolutely disgusting.


#3023097 Sam Burgess (merged threads)

Posted by EastLondonMike on 30 October 2014 - 07:42 PM

They really love the 'list of failed converts'.. If it didn't appear every time Rugby League players are mentioned it would be quite funny.

What is the saying? If you tell a lie often enough, soon enough people start believing


#3022523 02/11/14 - Australia v England KO 5am (GMT)

Posted by EastLondonMike on 29 October 2014 - 03:58 PM

The big thing for me is the potential for early penalties. Giving Australia repeated shots at our line in the opening 20 will result in tries conceded. 

 

I guess we have to combat this early by giving the referee absolutely no reason to blow his whistle.

 

During the game every player needs to get into the ref for any repeat offences like holding down, slowing the PTB etc .. Like i said in a previous post i don't really like putting extra pressure on the refs, but for this one game, its all on.




#3021885 02/11/14 - Australia v England KO 5am (GMT)

Posted by EastLondonMike on 28 October 2014 - 01:11 PM

Its absolutely appalling.. The England management should be speaking out about this, and in doing so put as much pressure on the referee as possible. Its not a nice thing to do, but as the Australians are so clearly seeking some extra advantage, in this instance i think its fair comment.

 

Maybe we should take bets on what tackle of the first set we get penalised on.. I'm going for tackle 3.