derk Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 salford lose two players of their limited squad but play their games including cup final. another team with much larger player register have three players affected but postpone their game. Maybe the second club worked out that they could maintain their percentage by not playing as opposed to probably losing to an in-form opposition. This demonstrates the flawed system that we are asked to support. Any views? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommygilf Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 The team that postponed didn't only have 3 players affected? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Futtocks Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Definitely shenanigans! Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted. Ralph Waldo Emerson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number 16 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 And Elvis lives at the North Pole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hela Wigmen Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Wigan are in the “major incident” category and need to have their training ground deep cleaned and everyone tested again. Salford don’t fall into that category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whippet13 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Apparently the moon landings were faked by the illuminati and the JFK second shooter was a Nephilim agent from the planet Niribu. I can't say any more because they are watching us..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 53 minutes ago, Tommygilf said: The team that postponed didn't only have 3 players affected? DFTT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Gary Hetherington decides the results of all matches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Don’t forget that Saints “own” the Disciplinary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number 16 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, LeeF said: DFTT Thank God for Google! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derk Posted October 15, 2020 Author Share Posted October 15, 2020 LeeF has a lot to say.His/Her remark about Saints was completely irrelevant to the topic.(I live in Wigan, hence why I pick up rumours and gossip about what occurs there). Wigan(since he thinks that was who I referred to) had THREE players who failed plus some ancillary staff. Salford had TWO but did not cancel. I acknowledge that I favour salford in the cup final but outside yorkshire who would not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbruce Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 1 minute ago, derk said: LeeF has a lot to say.His/Her remark about Saints was completely irrelevant to the topic.(I live in Wigan, hence why I pick up rumours and gossip about what occurs there). Wigan(since he thinks that was who I referred to) had THREE players who failed plus some ancillary staff. Salford had TWO but did not cancel. I acknowledge that I favour salford in the cup final but outside yorkshire who would not. I’m not sure what you are arguing do you want Salford to pull out of the cup final. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 7 minutes ago, derk said: LeeF has a lot to say.His/Her remark about Saints was completely irrelevant to the topic.(I live in Wigan, hence why I pick up rumours and gossip about what occurs there). Wigan(since he thinks that was who I referred to) had THREE players who failed plus some ancillary staff. Salford had TWO but did not cancel. I acknowledge that I favour salford in the cup final but outside yorkshire who would not. My comment was about as relevant as yours have been which are usually just gossip at best and closer to trolling in reality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derk Posted October 15, 2020 Author Share Posted October 15, 2020 bobbruce .No I was drawing a comparison between a club(salford) and another which seemed to have its own agenda maybe to the detriment of another, namely Catalans. Because clubs have to complete 15 matches to qualify Catalans only have 12 at the moment and the authorities seem to have no dates available for a rematch,unless they see sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derk Posted October 15, 2020 Author Share Posted October 15, 2020 LeeF can you define "trolling".when I was young a troll was a mythical creature who sometimes frightened nannygoats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WN83 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 3 hours ago, derk said: salford lose two players of their limited squad but play their games including cup final. another team with much larger player register have three players affected but postpone their game. Maybe the second club worked out that they could maintain their percentage by not playing as opposed to probably losing to an in-form opposition. This demonstrates the flawed system that we are asked to support. Any views? Ridiculous post. I get Wigan will never be popular but it’s not a reason to just make up bulls*it. Wigan have had 6 positive tests in the playing and staff group in a week. They have been shut down, they’re not allowed to go to their training facility until it’s been given a deep clean and they’re not allowed to get back to work/play until all the group have been retested and the track and trace protocols have been followed. They were not allowed to play the game tonight as the track and trace and the squad retesting/results would not be completed in time. What did you want them to do? Play the game not knowing who may have it and who may not, spread it around their own team and also risk passing it on to Catalans players (not like they were allowed anyway). We either go with the facts or we just go ‘Wigan= they’re up to no good’ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, derk said: LeeF can you define "trolling".when I was young a troll was a mythical creature who sometimes frightened nannygoats Google is your new best friend Try it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 5 minutes ago, WN83 said: Ridiculous post. I get Wigan will never be popular but it’s not a reason to just make up bulls*it. Wigan have had 6 positive tests in the playing and staff group in a week. They have been shut down, they’re not allowed to go to their training facility until it’s been given a deep clean and they’re not allowed to get back to work/play until all the group have been retested and the track and trace protocols have been followed. They were not allowed to play the game tonight as the track and trace and the squad retesting/results would not be completed in time. What did you want them to do? Play the game not knowing who may have it and who may not, spread it around their own team and also risk passing it on to Catalans players (not like they were allowed anyway). We either go with the facts or we just go ‘Wigan= they’re up to no good’ Ridiculous is one way to put it. Completely stupid is another Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.