Not big enough
Posted 20 July 2010 - 11:31 AM
Not big enough
Posted 20 July 2010 - 12:26 PM
Why not give them 3 years in SL to sort it out then? Better that then leaving clubs in there who have already had their 3 years.
In fact I think any club who has managed to win through to SL on the pitch should be given a 3 year stay of execution to sort it out
Posted 20 July 2010 - 12:30 PM
Printing & Graphic Design - Nationwide
Leaflets | Flyers | Matchday Programmes | Business Cards | Letterheads | Brochures | Posters | plus much, much more!
T: 01904 765334 | E: firstname.lastname@example.org
Official Matchday Magazine print & design partner to York City Knights, Hunslet Hawks & Dewsbury Rams
Posted 20 July 2010 - 03:10 PM
Barrow would never have gone up, they'd fail ground criteria.
I think you are being deliberately evasive bowes. How is it any different whether a side goes in to administration on promotion or trying to win a tick in a box to try to get the chance to apply for a SL franchise?
Administration is the same surely no matter what the circumstances that cuased it. Clubs in the top half of the Championship are all chasing the dream of getting a tick so that they can apply for licence, not guaranteed promotion. That tick only lasts for the 3 year period that they are in for licences and then they have to try all over again. That to me is more destructive to clubs financially than the old P & R system.
I remember when .............................
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimension, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave Hadfield - Independent 25th August 1996.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users