Rarefrith Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 Looks like a three match ban for Jack. Gutted for the lad.
jamescolin Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 Just looked this up he has received a caution. Where did you get three matches from?
Reddwarf Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 Ban comes from when he was sin bined . Bit harsh considering what the offence was .
tms Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 5 minutes ago, jamescolin said: Just looked this up he has received a caution. Where did you get three matches from? that was the first minute on knowles when he got put on report but got grade c charge on burns 48th minute when he got yellow card
jamescolin Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 Name on list twice. caution first one three matches second. We have no luck.
tms Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 just looked it up bussey got three and broadbent who did hardcastle got two
hrtbps Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 Ridiculous decision. He's made some stupid choices on the field in the past, but the ref on Sunday seemed to have made his mind up about him before the game even started. FEATHERSTONE ROVERS, A GENERATIONAL LOVE AFFAIR, AND THE CALL OF HISTORY A SECOND TIME AROUND
haskey Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 Agreed JC , Only consolation is Day is in the frame, however not a prop. I wonder what Carr thinks of this ridiculous decision
Private Baldrick Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 Does anybody think there is a deliberate RFL led policy to get our players banned more than other players?
leep Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 I have watched it over and over again. Nothing in it. Pathetic decision.
hrtbps Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 Anyone got footage of the two Bussey tackles for non-Rovers TV subscribers? FEATHERSTONE ROVERS, A GENERATIONAL LOVE AFFAIR, AND THE CALL OF HISTORY A SECOND TIME AROUND
tms Posted March 14, 2019 Posted March 14, 2019 54 minutes ago, Private Baldrick said: Does anybody think there is a deliberate RFL led policy to get our players banned more than other players? don't think they have it in for any clubs but certain players seem to get a bad deal maybe after eight matches for biting bussey now falls into that category 57 minutes ago, haskey said: Agreed JC , Only consolation is Day is in the frame, however not a prop. I wonder what Carr thinks of this ridiculous decision hope he gets stuck into the rfl and asks what's the difference between bussey broadbent and davey davey got off scott free for head high tackle on briscoe panel says initial contact on chest of opponent, which then bounces up into neck. not from where I was standing
gingdong Posted March 15, 2019 Posted March 15, 2019 13 hours ago, Private Baldrick said: Does anybody think there is a deliberate RFL led policy to get our players banned more than other players? does anyone think that when you over kill a joke that wasnt funny in the 1st place you make yourself look a complete knobber
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted March 15, 2019 Posted March 15, 2019 13 hours ago, Private Baldrick said: Does anybody think there is a deliberate RFL led policy to get our players banned more than other players? Could be, but more likely because Bussey has recent form and Broadbent doesn't. I'd imagine Carr isn't pleased about the lack of discipline shown by a player just back from a lengthy ban resulting in him missing around 1/3rd of the regular season.
The Phantom Horseman Posted March 15, 2019 Posted March 15, 2019 13 minutes ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said: Could be, but more likely because Bussey has recent form and Broadbent doesn't. I'd imagine Carr isn't pleased about the lack of discipline shown by a player just back from a lengthy ban resulting in him missing around 1/3rd of the regular season. If you watch the Bussey incident back on RoversTV, you can hear somebody from the bench (perhaps Paul March) shout "discipline now" literally a second before Bussey makes that tackle. "I won’t engage in a debate because the above is correct and if anything else is stated to the contrary it’s incorrect."
tms Posted March 15, 2019 Posted March 15, 2019 16 minutes ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said: Could be, but more likely because Bussey has recent form and Broadbent doesn't. I'd imagine Carr isn't pleased about the lack of discipline shown by a player just back from a lengthy ban resulting in him missing around 1/3rd of the regular season. But that's wrong the punishment should be handed out on the type and severity of the offence not because he's a good boy
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted March 15, 2019 Posted March 15, 2019 10 minutes ago, POR said: But that's wrong the punishment should be handed out on the type and severity of the offence not because he's a good boy He got the equivalent of the early guilty plea which was discontinued last season. Now you get it, if applicable, by default. Applies to all players equally.
The Phantom Horseman Posted March 15, 2019 Posted March 15, 2019 10 minutes ago, POR said: But that's wrong the punishment should be handed out on the type and severity of the offence not because he's a good boy Not sure I agree with that, in most aspects of life previous offences, or lack of them, have an impact on punishment and, apart from major offences, repeat offenders are more harshly dealt with than people with previously unblemished records. "I won’t engage in a debate because the above is correct and if anything else is stated to the contrary it’s incorrect."
tms Posted March 15, 2019 Posted March 15, 2019 6 minutes ago, The Phantom Horseman said: Not sure I agree with that, in most aspects of life previous offences, or lack of them, have an impact on punishment and, apart from major offences, repeat offenders are more harshly dealt with than people with previously unblemished records. agreed but were talking rugby league here not a crime against society that effects joe public a bad tackle is a bad tackle and should have the same ban if you want to punish previous offences then give them a big fine as well increasing it with every repeat offence
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted March 15, 2019 Posted March 15, 2019 24 minutes ago, POR said: agreed but were talking rugby league here not a crime against society that effects joe public a bad tackle is a bad tackle and should have the same ban if you want to punish previous offences then give them a big fine as well increasing it with every repeat offence The disciplinary process essentially follows the rules of English law, otherwise it would be wide open to legal challenge. Guidelines to the sentencing rules are here https://www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary/on-field_disciplinary I think you'll find the punishments (same as for Hardcastle and Day earlier this season) are in line with them.
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted March 15, 2019 Posted March 15, 2019 1 hour ago, The Phantom Horseman said: If you watch the Bussey incident back on RoversTV, you can hear somebody from the bench (perhaps Paul March) shout "discipline now" literally a second before Bussey makes that tackle. From our position behind the sticks it sounded as though someone on field shouted "Bussey" around the time as the tackle.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.