Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tosh said:

I think that ship has already sailed as the kiwis have multiple options at fullback and in the halves.

The Kiwis certainly do not have a FB to compare with Ponga. Neither CNK or Rapana can compare and Manu is best at centre given NZ's options there. 

And even at six, Ponga trump's Dylan Brown and Foran .

Link to comment
Share on other sites


57 minutes ago, Number 16 said:

The Kiwis certainly do not have a FB to compare with Ponga. Neither CNK or Rapana can compare and Manu is best at centre given NZ's options there. 

And even at six, Ponga trump's Dylan Brown and Foran .

I would argue that Jospeh Manu is as good a full back as Ponga, maybe better.  But a slightly moot point as Ponga at full back would allow Manu to play in the centre and that would make the Kiwis stronger overall.

As an aside, I also really like Brown as a 6.

Having 1, Ponga, 6, Brown and 7, Jahromoe Hughes in the spine and Manu in the centre, the Kiwis would be very very good.

  • Like 3

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Number 16 said:

The Kiwis certainly do not have a FB to compare with Ponga. Neither CNK or Rapana can compare and Manu is best at centre given NZ's options there. 

And even at six, Ponga trump's Dylan Brown and Foran .

I wasn’t comparing ponga to either manu, cnk, Rapana or Martin but that the selectors and kiwi fans wouldn’t accept ponga now after rejecting them for Queensland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Dunbar said:

I would argue that Jospeh Manu is as good a full back as Ponga, maybe better.  But a slightly moot point as Ponga at full back would allow Manu to play in the centre and that would make the Kiwis stronger overall.

As an aside, I also really like Brown as a 6.

Having 1, Ponga, 6, Brown and 7, Jahromoe Hughes in the spine and Manu in the centre, the Kiwis would be very very good.

That spine along with smith at #9 and their forward pack would be scary good.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tosh said:

Hence why he should have chosen NZ over Queensland.


Also turbo and Mitchell could play centre for the kangaroos while ponga would surely make the bench?

Why would you put a FB on the bench when you already have 3 FBs in the run-on team? (plus possibly Muster, if needed)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jean de Bordeaux said:

Curiously, before signing for Newcastele he was the target of NZ rugby, with a possibility to play for the All Blacks. Why not the Kiwis ? The SOO's rules are stupid ! He is a new zealander !

Wasn’t he quoted as saying it’s a lifelong ambition of his to play for the AB’s?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Number 16 said:

They'd welcome him with open arms!

We’ll have to agree to disagree but it’s a moot point anyway as he’s never showed any inclination of playing for the kiwis.

Personally as a neutral I would love to see him pull on the kiwi jersey just like Ronaldo did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jean de Bordeaux said:

Curiously, before signing for Newcastele he was the target of NZ rugby, with a possibility to play for the All Blacks. Why not the Kiwis ? The SOO's rules are stupid ! He is a new zealander !

True Jean. Few in this forum are sympathetic to the SOO rules when it interferes with international eligibility. 

My blog: https://rugbyl.blogspot.co.nz/

It takes wisdom to know when a discussion has run its course.

It takes reasonableness to end that discussion. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RayCee said:

True Jean. Few in this forum are sympathetic to the SOO rules when it interferes with international eligibility. 

You’d have thought that finances would have overtaken any kangaroo trial/selection process in todays state of origin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I read that Dylan Walker is attempting to overturn his ban on representing NZ due to having played for Australia in 2014. The NZRL is behind his appeal.

Playing fantasy RL, a backline of Ponga, Mulitalo, Manu, Walker, Rapana, Brown and Hughes behind THAT pack could really threaten.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Number 16 said:

Now I read that Dylan Walker is attempting to overturn his ban on representing NZ due to having played for Australia in 2014. The NZRL is behind his appeal.

Playing fantasy RL, a backline of Ponga, Mulitalo, Manu, Walker, Rapana, Brown and Hughes behind THAT pack could really threaten.

 

Dylan Walker is a direct descendent of Fletcher Christian …who was born not far from me 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Number 16 said:

Now I read that Dylan Walker is attempting to overturn his ban on representing NZ due to having played for Australia in 2014. The NZRL is behind his appeal.

Playing fantasy RL, a backline of Ponga, Mulitalo, Manu, Walker, Rapana, Brown and Hughes behind THAT pack could really threaten.

 

That would be ridiculous but didn’t former Leeds centre tonie Carroll play for NZ and then Australia or the other way round?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Tosh said:

That would be ridiculous but didn’t former Leeds centre tonie Carroll play for NZ and then Australia or the other way round?

Yes, with Australia after NZ.

Tbh, international RL is a dog's breakfast anyway, so I can live with movements in just about any direction. 

True, our sport is a big (the biggest?) 'offender' when it comes to 'breaking' a basically 19thC set of international qualification rules, but RL is far from the only one. 

Maybe only soccer is strong enough, and wealthy enough to buck the trend, but ethnicity is becoming as strong a pull as formal nationality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/08/2022 at 12:54, Damien said:

It's a travesty how few internationals our top players have plated.

Indeed.

Even if he'd 'put his hand up' for another country as has been suggested, he'd still be struggling to reach double figures.

As would anyone who was first choice.

The international system is a joke.

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Number 16 said:

Yes, with Australia after NZ.

Tbh, international RL is a dog's breakfast anyway, so I can live with movements in just about any direction. 

True, our sport is a big (the biggest?) 'offender' when it comes to 'breaking' a basically 19thC set of international qualification rules, but RL is far from the only one. 

Maybe only soccer is strong enough, and wealthy enough to buck the trend, but ethnicity is becoming as strong a pull as formal nationality.

I truly despise it but it’s interesting to see that rugby Union is seemingly following RL nation hoping especially with island nations like Tonga and Samoa etc.

 

I wonder if this is being used to counter rugby leagues rise in popularity within the pacific islands?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Number 16 said:

Yes, it always shocked me how few top Rugby League players also double as a chef.

I can always remember former French international and Sheffield eagles centre Jean-Marc Garcia being quite handy in the kitchen I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tosh said:

I truly despise it but it’s interesting to see that rugby Union is seemingly following RL nation hoping especially with island nations like Tonga and Samoa etc.

 

I wonder if this is being used to counter rugby leagues rise in popularity within the pacific islands?

IMO, the breakdown of what was, essentially, a 19th Century interpretation of eligibility rules across Empire sport, thus later, all sport, was based on born there and play for the nation.

Now I'm not woke, but woke type 'politics' has given preference of ethnicity over an accident of birth. If you are born in one nation and live there but are raised in a community that treasures its alternative origins who cares where your grandparents are from. The world has changed. Play for heritage/or/birth. I don't care. (Yet many of you think I'm a right wing a s s hole).

Does it matter who people choose to play for, just so long as it's genuine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.