Today at the RFL Disciplinary...

[Old Frightful]

Hull FC received no bans, no fines...in fact, not a sausage.

That is all.

[daz39]

Cool....Things are looking up then

[Old Frightful]

3 minutes ago, daz39 said:

Cool....Things are looking up then

"Always look on the bright side of life"...

[Chronicler of Chiswick]

4 minutes ago, Old Frightful said:

Hull FC received no bans, no fines...in fact, not a sausage.

That is all.

The players are now so demoralised that they can't even be bothered to foul the opposition any more.

[Lowdesert]

I’m amazed the hip drop tackle on Lacans didn’t get picked up in the Leigh v Fev game.

All the minutae used to discipline a player for head related issues yet nothing  for a hip drop that causes injury.

[phiggins]

55 minutes ago, Lowdesert said:

I’m amazed the hip drop tackle on Lacans didn’t get picked up in the Leigh v Fev game.

All the minutae used to discipline a player for head related issues yet nothing  for a hip drop that causes injury.

Not seen it back, but it highlights two issues. One where the MRP have stopped publishing details of incidents they've reviewed and decided against a charge, which would answer questions like this one. And another, which has always been the case, there seem to be areas both on the field, and in the MRP that get clamped down on to the detriment of other areas. There was a tackle in round 1 where Edwin Ipape was injured after contact from a 3rd man in the tackle that I suspect would've seen a ban last season.

[Lowdesert]

8 minutes ago, phiggins said:

Not seen it back, but it highlights two issues. One where the MRP have stopped publishing details of incidents they've reviewed and decided against a charge, which would answer questions like this one. And another, which has always been the case, there seem to be areas both on the field, and in the MRP that get clamped down on to the detriment of other areas. There was a tackle in round 1 where Edwin Ipape was injured after contact from a 3rd man in the tackle that I suspect would've seen a ban last season.

I find it it hard to believe that it’s been reviewed and they found no case to answer.  
41st minute.

[phiggins]

17 minutes ago, Lowdesert said:

I find it it hard to believe that it’s been reviewed and they found no case to answer.  
41st minute.

Given it resulted in an injury, I’d be very surprised if it wasn’t reviewed. Sadly, we don’t know what is reviewed and why incidents are found no case to answer because they’ve stopped telling us for some reason. 

[GeordieSaint]

Who has been charged this week then?

[bobbruce]

Bells out of the Good Friday game. 

[HullWire]

3 hours ago, Old Frightful said:

Hull FC received no bans, no fines...in fact, not a sausage.

That is all.

Are they planning on an appeal?

[GeordieSaint]

42 minutes ago, bobbruce said:

Bells out of the Good Friday game. 

Nicht gut. He’s been excellent this year so far. 

[Ullman]

5 hours ago, Old Frightful said:

Hull FC received no bans, no fines...in fact, not a sausage.

That is all.

Blimey! We'll be keeping thirteen men on the field next.

[Old Frightful]

1 minute ago, Ullman said:

Blimey! We'll be keeping thirteen men on the field next.

A rare piece of Hull FC optimism.