From memory when Tony got sent off that day it involved a fight with Gavin Swinson (also dismissed) and few others in front of the family stand near the half way line, must admit I was glad when he joined the Rovers he turned out to be a cracking signing for the few seasons he was with us.
Swinson was only sinbinned for providing the best 'play' of the match in winding Tonks up enough to thump him.
Everyone is saying the same thing "No" but if we need to finish 4th as we know we do then we must play on a level playing field. To me it's all in or all out. If AH thinks it strengthens us and we can then we should. The lost issue here is development as it doesn't encourage youth investment and dare I say it makes us a feeder club. In summary no but if others do then so should we - if it gets us 4th
So why have we signed so many players on? If they're not good enough they should be shipped out with whoever signed them on in the first place following close behind.
This season isn't about sentiment.... it's about that middle 8. Nowt less.
So why the h3ll have we signed so many forwards? If they're not good enough they shouldn't have been signed. Gives me no confidence at all in the judgement of whoever is agreeing to sign players on. Bringing in 2 new players who haven't trained with the rest of the squad, don't know the plays..... well that's really going to help. Far too early to be panicing as it would appear we are (again).
Seems you've also done a u-turn on this season being one of consolidation
So Cas should be promoting their brand in that area and if successful, presumably they will be on a par with Warrington catchment
Clearly you don't know much about the area if you mean Ponte, South Elmsall, Knottingley etc as Cas are already targetting there, and have been for years, just as are Featherstone and Wakefield. There's no way any of the 3 could claim these places as an exclusive catchment area. As others have pointed out there's a lot of affinity for the area's other teams (and now even Leeds due to the house buiding that has taken place over the last 15 years or so) in these towns which would not only take years to change but also require the other 2 teams to disappear. Even if folk don't actually attend PO Rd or Belle Vue they'd be even less likely to go to Cas. Further afield in the Selby District they face competition from Leeds, Doncaster, York and the 2 Hull clubs for (potential) supporters.
As l'ange has said, the combined support for the 3 Wakefield District clubs is pretty abysmal for a so called hot bed of the game, although to be fair, it's the same story for most of the 'heartlands'. The sad reality is that in the UK RL isn't anywhere near as big, or important, as many on here seem to think it is.
Ponte is in the immediate vicinity, it's stuck on to Cas at junction 32. Selby and eastwards from there are the way to go locally, but they and all other clubs should be working on broadening their demographic as well.
Problem is that although the Selby District has a population of about 80k it is spread quite thinly making targetting potential attendees difficult and, more importantly, costly. The population of Selby itself (ca20k) isn't much bigger than that of Featherstone (ca15k), with the next biggest urban areas of Tadcaster and Sherburn having pops of about 6k each. Tadcaster and Sherburn are much more likely to be attracted to Leeds and I also suspect the east of the district is probably more inclined to lean towards 'Hull' rather than any of the 'Wakefield' clubs. To match the population of Warrington (200k+) you need to combine the populations of Ponte (30k), Cas (40k), Hemsworth (13k), Featherstone (15k), South Elmsall (13k), South Kirkby/Moorthorpe (7k) and the whole of the Selby District. In reality the only one of the 'Wakefield' clubs with the real potential to become huge is Wakefield, and they are in deperate need of a new ground to have any chance of doing so. Unless, of course, the 3 unite to form a 'super club' but there's more chance of me winning the lottery 2 draws on the trot than that happening.
That's one thing that's a bit weird. The 10k capacity of the new stadium will be less than the current capacity (before the wall collapsed) of Wheldon Road.
A lot of these new stadiums are designed to be able to increase the capacity at a future date though.
Anyway, I know of two households on Park Road and Stainburn Avenue who are strongly against the development. Has the process gone beyond where they consider the objections of local residents? I have no idea.
We've seen that figure surpassed by cas during the SL era.
But more importantly to me there has to be growth built in to a plan for the future. On top of this the stadium needs to be multi use and be able to stage other major events.
There's very little detail regarding the stadium - the only comments I've seen are the capacity and the description 'community'. Definitely no mention of whether it can be expanded or not and (lack of) parking is a massive negative for planning, match day and potential other use. I'd also wager there'll be quite a few more residents on the Pontefract side of the M62 who'll be objecting when they realise that their streets will become car parks on match days too.
In reality the stadium really is only a sweetener from the developers and is more than likely to be built as cheaply as possible - no doubt the developers have set aside a figure they will spend. IF it does come to fruition, CTRLFC may regret going down this particular route in the longer term
Really? He's taken Halifax from being one of the most exciting and entertaining teams in the Championship to a dour 5 drives and a kick side (and not even a winning one, for which he would be forgiven) in next to no time. I doubt there's any other supporter of Fev who'd share your view.
The RFL have made a rod for their own back with this one. Suppose, say, Keighley, Whitehaven and Workington now break those same operational rules in an attempt to ensure they avoid relegation...........
Like I said thebacca, its all down to how you define success and sod all about "what I or any other bug ger deserves"!
If you define success as winning tge league leaders sheild daryl was an unequivocal success.
if you regard success as winning trophies, he wasn't.
Thats a simple enough concept to grasp is it not? And absolutely nowt to do with what we deserve.
Daryl took the cas job and fair play to him. He's done well there with limited resources.
Daryl leaving wasn't the issue.... he'd have gone anyway.
appointing bastian was a bad un.... a bloody nightmare of a coach who looked way way out of his depth and so far out of touch with reality he might have well come from mars. That was the issue. Set us back at least six years
Just a point though Robin, as I'm sure you know, we won those league titles by small margins (3pts 3 times and 6pts once) so we weren't the totally dominant force people believe. We did win 4 of the 10 trophies available over the period DP was in charge (would have been 5 but for a complete fluke event and I'm not counting the LLS or GF last season as he'd gone by then). Anyone who does not consider that a success is living in a dream world. Interestingly a bloke was brought in at the end of last season and hailed as some sort of messiah even though he failed to even get us to the GF!