Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Gerrumonside ref

Has Sky TV sounded the death knell for ‘Franchising’?

Recommended Posts

Given that Sky TV has now been very positive about the Championship playoffs in the last few days - does that mean no closed shop while they are lead broadcaster?

I know the overall subject is an emotional old chestnut.

But Sky’s influence will surely ensure promotion/relegation for the conceivable future with all it’s positive/negative points.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Gerrumonside ref said:

Given that Sky TV has now been very positive about the Championship playoffs in the last few days - does that mean no closed shop while they are lead broadcaster?

I know the overall subject is an emotional old chestnut.

But Sky’s influence will surely ensure promotion/relegation for the conceivable future with all it’s positive/negative points.

 

I think Sky's opinions are over-stated on things like this. They want a number of games to televise and deliver the viewing figures. 

Sure some games may get a bit better figures, but we are talking tens of thousands in many cases, and I don't see these numbers leading to huge subscription changes. 

Sky have happily covered normal P&R, Super 8's, licensing, and the current structure.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Dave T said:

I think Sky's opinions are over-stated on things like this. They want a number of games to televise and deliver the viewing figures. 

Sure some games may get a bit better figures, but we are talking tens of thousands in many cases, and I don't see these numbers leading to huge subscription changes. 

Sky have happily covered normal P&R, Super 8's, licensing, and the current structure.

Fair enough, do you think the Championship would be televised at all on Sky if it was not feeding into the top flight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Gerrumonside ref said:

Fair enough, do you think the Championship would be televised at all on Sky if it was not feeding into the top flight?

Probably not. Wasn't it shown on Premier during licensing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dave T said:

Probably not. Wasn't it shown on Premier during licensing. 

I’m not sure, I can’t remember.

If it was on Premier, I assume it’s because it wasn’t seen as worth showing in its format then by Sky at that time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gerrumonside ref said:

I’m not sure, I can’t remember.

If it was on Premier, I assume it’s because it wasn’t seen as worth showing in its format then by Sky at that time.

Even now, Sky are showing the minimum amount. The numbers we are talking about are easily replaced for them. 

That is a shame. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt Sky would want to show the championship if there was no P&R, as it would become an utterly insignificant competition, much like the bottom half of Super League would. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought the RFL had sounded the death knell for franchising by ensuring P&R is enshrined in the Super League Europe constitution (see the latest Articles of Association on Companies House)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Eddie said:

I doubt Sky would want to show the championship if there was no P&R, as it would become an utterly insignificant competition, much like the bottom half of Super League would. 

What about Club pride fighting to avoid coming last in the competition. It's called the wooden spoon in the southern hemisphere and Clubs fight to avoid the embarrassment of the wooden spoon! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, kiwis 13 6 said:

What about Club pride fighting to avoid coming last in the competition. It's called the wooden spoon in the southern hemisphere and Clubs fight to avoid the embarrassment of the wooden spoon! 

What about club pride fighting to play at a higher level by proving they are good enough ' on the pitch ' ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GUBRATS said:

What about club pride fighting to play at a higher level by proving they are good enough ' on the pitch ' ?

What about millions of dollars in TV rights, Sponsorship and youth development going down the drain ?

Edited by kiwis 13 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, kiwis 13 6 said:

What about Club pride fighting to avoid coming last in the competition. It's called the wooden spoon in the southern hemisphere and Clubs fight to avoid the embarrassment of the wooden spoon! 

Well if someone wants to watch that they can, but I wouldn’t. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, kiwis 13 6 said:

What about millions of dollars in TV rights, Sponsorship and youth development going down the drain ?

What are you on about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, kiwis 13 6 said:

What about millions of dollars in TV rights, Sponsorship and youth development going down the drain ?

And yet SKY have just announced they are to broadcast the Championship play offs , which they didn't do when there was no P and R ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Dave T said:

I think Sky's opinions are over-stated on things like this. They want a number of games to televise and deliver the viewing figures. 

Sure some games may get a bit better figures, but we are talking tens of thousands in many cases, and I don't see these numbers leading to huge subscription changes. 

Sky have happily covered normal P&R, Super 8's, licensing, and the current structure.

Completely, Sky have literally, clearly, and unequivocally said they have no direct influence on this. 

The competitions put something out to tender, they bid for it.

It's up to the rfl/sl what that is. Sky make value judgement on whatever they offer to sell.

Also with SL selling their own right, even if sky would pay 1billion a year for the championship it wouldnt actually affect the value of the rights SL are selling so even if Sky loved promotion, unless they loved relegation it's not really a factor. 

It's interesting that for years IMG sold SL rights and sky had no interest in the championship, the only time Sky have looked st the championship was the dodgy deal that nigel wood forced through that has ended up with sky owning the championship rights but not really bothering to use them 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, GUBRATS said:

And yet SKY have just announced they are to broadcast the Championship play offs , which they didn't do when there was no P and R ?

What value is that to SL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Man of Kent said:

Thought the RFL had sounded the death knell for franchising by ensuring P&R is enshrined in the Super League Europe constitution (see the latest Articles of Association on Companies House)

Theres no change really in that. It was always the case.

The only real change is in relation to what happens at 14 and 16 sides which is now defined and previously wasnt.

Though as this is subject to SL and RFL agreement it's not really any stronger than it was anyway

Edited by scotchy1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, scotchy1 said:

What value is that to SL?

None what so ever , but it does indicate interest , that wasn't there under licencing 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Eddie said:

What are you on about?

If Catalan Dragons or Toronto get relegated millions lost off there budgets not to mention all hard the work thats gone into getting both sides to where they are and highly likely may not be around or able fight for promotion again. However It is good that Championship is covered by Sky and P & R is great for north of England sides to retain there market share, not so good for an international competition seeking fixed term broadcasting rights and sponsors. 

Edited by kiwis 13 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GUBRATS said:

None what so ever , but it does indicate interest , that wasn't there under licencing 

Of course it does 👍, why on earth would they have shown it before. If anyone wants an example of what P&R does they just have to look at what’s happened to non league football in this country since the football league stopped their closed shop, it’s boomed. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GUBRATS said:

None what so ever , but it does indicate interest , that wasn't there under licencing 

Not really. Sky already own the rights as wood bundled them together. It doesnt really cost them anything to screen them.

Previously they would have had to put together a package in competition with others

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, kiwis 13 6 said:

If Catalan Dragons or Toronto get relegated millions lost off there budgets not to mention all hard the work thats gone into getting both sides to where they are and highly likely may not be around or able fight for promotion again. However It is good that Championship is covered by Sky and P & R is great for north of England sides to retain there market share, not so good for an international competition seeking fixed term broadcasting rights and sponsors. 

If Catalans or Toronto go down it’s because they deserve to, based on their results on the pitch. I appreciate that other countries see things differently when it comes to things like P&R and wooden spoons and that’s fine, but it’s not possible to impose Australian sports culture in the UK. 
 

Anyway what about if Castleford or Huddersfield go down, doesn’t that matter to you or is it just Toronto and Catalans who don’t deserve to go down if they finish bottom?

Edited by Eddie
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, scotchy1 said:

Not really. Sky already own the rights as wood bundled them together. It doesnt really cost them anything to screen them.

Previously they would have had to put together a package in competition with others

It doesn't cost them anything but they didn't show them before even though they did have those rights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...