Jump to content

Chissy NOT GUILTY


Recommended Posts


It's baffling how a group of people can find you guilty and impose an 8 match ban, to then turn 360 to find him not guilty then quash the ban

Bunch of clowns 

Lunatics running the asylum 

Great news for Fev😁😁

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, marklaspalmas said:

Great news.

The whole incident and its handling has been.... curious, to say the least.

Let the record show that Dane Chisholm was banned for two matches for something that didn't happen.

Could only happen to Fev lol.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like my suggestion that they would reach a compromise after the two Friendlies and cancel the the reat of the suspension was right. I wonder if they read my idea of a compromise. A two match absence then back to normal. All parties receiving something after deliberation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FInally something from the RFL

An Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal last night overturned an eight-match suspension which had been imposed on Dane Chisholm of Featherstone Rovers at an Operational Rules Tribunal last month.

Chisholm was found not guilty of the offence for which he had been charged, and the matter is now closed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, POR said:

FInally something from the RFL

An Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal last night overturned an eight-match suspension which had been imposed on Dane Chisholm of Featherstone Rovers at an Operational Rules Tribunal last month.

That's simply a news snippet, not a disciplinary report. Two simple sentences and they still couldn't get it right.

They wrote:

Quote

Chisholm was found not guilty of the offence for which he had been charged, and the matter is now closed.

They should have written:

Chisholm was found not guilty of the offence for which he had been found guilty and suspended, and the matter is now closed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, marklaspalmas said:

That's simply a news snippet, not a disciplinary report. Two simple sentences and they still couldn't get it right.

 

What did you expect Mark the RFL will never admit they got owt wrong just put out theses snippets to cover their backsides

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All very true, but it is great that he will be back in the fold.

season starts on Monday, onwards and upwards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jamescolin said:

Looks like my suggestion that they would reach a compromise after the two Friendlies and cancel the the reat of the suspension was right. I wonder if they read my idea of a compromise. A two match absence then back to normal. All parties receiving something after deliberation.

Looks like you were spot on Colin.  I have to admit I thought there was more chance of hell freezing over......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great news of course but how often does this happen I wonder ?  ie not reduced on appeal whilst serving a ban but actually found not guilty after serving part of a ban. 

Before we all rejoice that the RFL have for once let us off the hook - this shouldn't have happened in the first place.

If the allegations were unfounded how can our preparations be so disrupted with no comeback ? What about action against Oldham ?......

Lets just say I'll be looking at their results with interest this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...