Jump to content

Bulldog inbound 2023


Batley Bob

Recommended Posts


Not saying that just pointing out the obvious, and also for those who don't know the rules.

Keep up the good work.

Edited by RogerT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lingard let slip whilst being interviewed after the match and saying he is signed on for next year although he will have to drop him if he gets near my record( he laughed).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a rallying point if one were needed for weary bodies; 3 games in 10 days, 4 in 14 for a club which doesn't have the over 40 players of the Leighs and Fevs. Go on Dogs!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, phildog said:

This is a rallying point if one were needed for weary bodies; 3 games in 10 days, 4 in 14 for a club which doesn't have the over 40 players of the Leighs and Fevs. Go on Dogs!

Just hold your horses , this maybe a bit premature 

 

 

IMG_0583.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, RogerT said:

If them are the rules, then they are the rules.

We have form for interpreting them rules differently shall we say 😉

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Touch Rugby W(h)inger and part-time Super Hero (Thursday mornings by appointment) :superman:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BATLEY BULLDOGS RLFC :bb:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but i've got to have little giggle  he was training to start next year but decided to play because manly players refused to wear a pride shirt after deadline day if they had all worn it then you would not be having this conversation so it's Manleys fault for making the DOGS look a little bit silly for not knowing or finding out the rules before allegedly naming him in your squad for wednesday 😠

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Drigdog said:

 If we are short on bodies it would make far more sense to call back Blagbrough, Collinson. Everett or Burton than rely on someone who might not be fit and as not played for nearly 3 years.

I thought Blagbrough had been transferred, not loaned to the Rams?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.