The Phantom Horseman Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 https://www.featherstonerovers.co.uk/news/statement-dane-chisholm-OtdpQ/ "I won’t engage in a debate because the above is correct and if anything else is stated to the contrary it’s incorrect."
The Phantom Horseman Posted January 28, 2022 Author Posted January 28, 2022 Apologies for starting a separate thread, just wanted to spread the news asap, but hopefully people will agree it deserves one. "I won’t engage in a debate because the above is correct and if anything else is stated to the contrary it’s incorrect."
sentoffagain2 Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 17 minutes ago, The Phantom Horseman said: https://www.featherstonerovers.co.uk/news/statement-dane-chisholm-OtdpQ/ Great news a fair outcome due to no third party evidence.Hope we can move on and let Chizzy do the business on the field.
Guest Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 Finally someone at the RFL has take a common sense pill
Robin Evans Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 6 minutes ago, POR said: Finally someone at the RFL has take a common sense pill It couldn't be reight that he had to prove his innocence. Chuffed with this. Brightened my day up. Glad for the lad
philcow Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 Agreed robin he might only start on bench i reckon on monday having missed friendlys with the bloody stupid ban
coolie Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 It's baffling how a group of people can find you guilty and impose an 8 match ban, to then turn 360 to find him not guilty then quash the ban Bunch of clowns Lunatics running the asylum Great news for Fev
marklaspalmas Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 Great news. The whole incident and its handling has been.... curious, to say the least. Let the record show that Dane Chisholm was banned for two matches for something that didn't happen. https://www.fevarchive.co.uk/
Robin Evans Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 8 minutes ago, marklaspalmas said: Let the record show that Dane Chisholm was banned for two matches for something that didn't happen. Indeed
Fevrover Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 56 minutes ago, marklaspalmas said: Great news. The whole incident and its handling has been.... curious, to say the least. Let the record show that Dane Chisholm was banned for two matches for something that didn't happen. Could only happen to Fev lol.
jamescolin Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 Looks like my suggestion that they would reach a compromise after the two Friendlies and cancel the the reat of the suspension was right. I wonder if they read my idea of a compromise. A two match absence then back to normal. All parties receiving something after deliberation.
Guest Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 FInally something from the RFL An Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal last night overturned an eight-match suspension which had been imposed on Dane Chisholm of Featherstone Rovers at an Operational Rules Tribunal last month. Chisholm was found not guilty of the offence for which he had been charged, and the matter is now closed.
marklaspalmas Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 33 minutes ago, POR said: FInally something from the RFL An Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal last night overturned an eight-match suspension which had been imposed on Dane Chisholm of Featherstone Rovers at an Operational Rules Tribunal last month. That's simply a news snippet, not a disciplinary report. Two simple sentences and they still couldn't get it right. They wrote: Quote Chisholm was found not guilty of the offence for which he had been charged, and the matter is now closed. They should have written: Chisholm was found not guilty of the offence for which he had been found guilty and suspended, and the matter is now closed. https://www.fevarchive.co.uk/
Guest Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 5 minutes ago, marklaspalmas said: That's simply a news snippet, not a disciplinary report. Two simple sentences and they still couldn't get it right. What did you expect Mark the RFL will never admit they got owt wrong just put out theses snippets to cover their backsides
haskey Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 All very true, but it is great that he will be back in the fold. season starts on Monday, onwards and upwards.
jamescolin Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 Let's hope they include him in the team sheet. UTR>
RobLambert Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 5 hours ago, jamescolin said: Looks like my suggestion that they would reach a compromise after the two Friendlies and cancel the the reat of the suspension was right. I wonder if they read my idea of a compromise. A two match absence then back to normal. All parties receiving something after deliberation. Looks like you were spot on Colin. I have to admit I thought there was more chance of hell freezing over......
RobLambert Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 Great news of course but how often does this happen I wonder ? ie not reduced on appeal whilst serving a ban but actually found not guilty after serving part of a ban. Before we all rejoice that the RFL have for once let us off the hook - this shouldn't have happened in the first place. If the allegations were unfounded how can our preparations be so disrupted with no comeback ? What about action against Oldham ?...... Lets just say I'll be looking at their results with interest this year.
jamescolin Posted January 29, 2022 Posted January 29, 2022 Your initials are RL I think you are on the right Rugby League track. Thanks for your reply to my suggestion.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.