Jump to content

Fri 7 Feb: SL: Hull FC v Hull Kingston Rovers KO 7.45pm (TV)

John Drake

Who will win?  

43 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win?

    • Hull FC
      38
    • Hull Kingston Rovers
      5

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 07/02/20 at 19:45

Recommended Posts

Futtocks

Futtocks

Posted
Posted

Hey, Sterlo's turned up! Mystery selection by Radford, perhaps?

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson


  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Futtocks

Futtocks

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, DavidM said:

Whatever the scheduled time is on sky there’ll always late by 3 or 4 minutes  for some reason 

Indeed. The NRL consider a mere 3-4 minute delay as punctuality taken to OCD levels, though.

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Leyther_Matt

Leyther_Matt

Posted
Posted

Have we changed the rules to something akin to American Football when it comes to scoring a try? No way on earth that Livett came even close to grounding that. Can’t decide what is more concerning, Hicks stood a yard away and sending it up as a try, or the video referee agreeing?!

Just Browny

Just Browny

Posted
Posted

Decent start to this game. Hull KR have looked good and that was a great effort by Livett - but still not sure he got it down.

I can confirm 30+ less sales for Scotland vs Italy at Workington, after this afternoons test purchase for the Tonga match, £7.50 is extremely reasonable, however a £2.50 'delivery' fee for a walk in purchase is beyond taking the mickey, good luck with that, it's cheaper on the telly.

DavidM

DavidM

Posted
Posted
Just now, Futtocks said:

Indeed. The NRL consider a mere 3-4 minute delay as punctuality taken to OCD levels, though.

There’s obviously a broadcasting reason ( I’d guess ) , I just always find it a bit strange . You schedule a time so kick off on it . It doesn’t look good . They nail it in footy , certainly in Europe and internationals , and cricket to the second . But good if they sorted it just for perception at least 

Just Browny

Just Browny

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Leyther_Matt said:

Have we changed the rules to something akin to American Football when it comes to scoring a try? No way on earth that Livett came even close to grounding that. Can’t decide what is more concerning, Hicks stood a yard away and sending it up as a try, or the video referee agreeing?!

Weren't two tries disallowed last night because the ball was just held up?

I can confirm 30+ less sales for Scotland vs Italy at Workington, after this afternoons test purchase for the Tonga match, £7.50 is extremely reasonable, however a £2.50 'delivery' fee for a walk in purchase is beyond taking the mickey, good luck with that, it's cheaper on the telly.

Leyther_Matt

Leyther_Matt

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Just Browny said:

Weren't two tries disallowed last night because the ball was just held up?

Ironically by the same referee who has awarded the one tonight!

DavidM

DavidM

Posted
Posted

I think that’s the ‘ refs call ‘ nonsense coming to the fore again . If he’s handing to the VR he doesn’t know so why bind the hands of the VR ? Just let him decide or give what you see on the field . Refs call is unsatisfactory both ways 

hullste

hullste

Posted
Posted

Can someone please explain the difference between Linnets try and Lomax’s last night. Both were sent up as a try, both looked like they may have been held up but the video evidence was inconclusive yet the video ref overturned one and not the other??The only difference I have seen is that the sky panelist’s made a big issue of tonight’s being inconclusive 

DavidM

DavidM

Posted
Posted

I’m interested in watching SKD . He’s got a touch of the Konrad Hurrell’s in being hot n cold , but he could be a shrewd acquisition 

Cheshire Setter

Cheshire Setter

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, DavidM said:

I think that’s the ‘ refs call ‘ nonsense coming to the fore again . If he’s handing to the VR he doesn’t know so why bind the hands of the VR ? Just let him decide or give what you see on the field . Refs call is unsatisfactory both ways 

To be honest I preferred the original VR use, where the VR had a look and made a decision on what he/she saw from the cameras.   I'd obviously prefer it at every game but we know that isn't going to happen yet.

Futtocks

Futtocks

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Man of Kent said:

KR retake the lead again. Or have they?

If that's a try, it is a cracker. Could be offside, though.

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.