The Phantom Horseman Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 https://www.featherstonerovers.co.uk/news/statement-dane-chisholm-OtdpQ/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfey Rovers Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Great news! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Evans Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Get in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Phantom Horseman Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 Apologies for starting a separate thread, just wanted to spread the news asap, but hopefully people will agree it deserves one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sentoffagain2 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 17 minutes ago, The Phantom Horseman said: https://www.featherstonerovers.co.uk/news/statement-dane-chisholm-OtdpQ/ Great news a fair outcome due to no third party evidence.Hope we can move on and let Chizzy do the business on the field. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
POR Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Finally someone at the RFL has take a common sense pill 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Evans Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 6 minutes ago, POR said: Finally someone at the RFL has take a common sense pill It couldn't be reight that he had to prove his innocence. Chuffed with this. Brightened my day up. Glad for the lad 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philcow Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Agreed robin he might only start on bench i reckon on monday having missed friendlys with the bloody stupid ban Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolie Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 It's baffling how a group of people can find you guilty and impose an 8 match ban, to then turn 360 to find him not guilty then quash the ban Bunch of clowns Lunatics running the asylum Great news for Fev 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marklaspalmas Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Great news. The whole incident and its handling has been.... curious, to say the least. Let the record show that Dane Chisholm was banned for two matches for something that didn't happen. 4 https://www.fevarchive.co.uk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Evans Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 8 minutes ago, marklaspalmas said: Let the record show that Dane Chisholm was banned for two matches for something that didn't happen. Indeed 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fevrover Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 56 minutes ago, marklaspalmas said: Great news. The whole incident and its handling has been.... curious, to say the least. Let the record show that Dane Chisholm was banned for two matches for something that didn't happen. Could only happen to Fev lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamescolin Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Looks like my suggestion that they would reach a compromise after the two Friendlies and cancel the the reat of the suspension was right. I wonder if they read my idea of a compromise. A two match absence then back to normal. All parties receiving something after deliberation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
POR Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 FInally something from the RFL An Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal last night overturned an eight-match suspension which had been imposed on Dane Chisholm of Featherstone Rovers at an Operational Rules Tribunal last month. Chisholm was found not guilty of the offence for which he had been charged, and the matter is now closed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marklaspalmas Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 33 minutes ago, POR said: FInally something from the RFL An Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal last night overturned an eight-match suspension which had been imposed on Dane Chisholm of Featherstone Rovers at an Operational Rules Tribunal last month. That's simply a news snippet, not a disciplinary report. Two simple sentences and they still couldn't get it right. They wrote: Quote Chisholm was found not guilty of the offence for which he had been charged, and the matter is now closed. They should have written: Chisholm was found not guilty of the offence for which he had been found guilty and suspended, and the matter is now closed. https://www.fevarchive.co.uk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
POR Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 5 minutes ago, marklaspalmas said: That's simply a news snippet, not a disciplinary report. Two simple sentences and they still couldn't get it right. What did you expect Mark the RFL will never admit they got owt wrong just put out theses snippets to cover their backsides Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haskey Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 All very true, but it is great that he will be back in the fold. season starts on Monday, onwards and upwards. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamescolin Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Let's hope they include him in the team sheet. UTR> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobLambert Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 5 hours ago, jamescolin said: Looks like my suggestion that they would reach a compromise after the two Friendlies and cancel the the reat of the suspension was right. I wonder if they read my idea of a compromise. A two match absence then back to normal. All parties receiving something after deliberation. Looks like you were spot on Colin. I have to admit I thought there was more chance of hell freezing over...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobLambert Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Great news of course but how often does this happen I wonder ? ie not reduced on appeal whilst serving a ban but actually found not guilty after serving part of a ban. Before we all rejoice that the RFL have for once let us off the hook - this shouldn't have happened in the first place. If the allegations were unfounded how can our preparations be so disrupted with no comeback ? What about action against Oldham ?...... Lets just say I'll be looking at their results with interest this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamescolin Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 Your initials are RL I think you are on the right Rugby League track. Thanks for your reply to my suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now