Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, Damien said:

Big American YouTuber Speed, with 33 million followers, at the NZ Warriors from about 2hrs 19 mins. Stuff like this certainly won't be bad for the popularity of the Warriors and the game in NZ:

 

 

Warriors should invite him to vegas as a special guest.

  • Like 3

Posted
11 hours ago, DlEHARD said:

I agree it is a Broncos protectionist attitude. And look what the Dolphins did for the sport, amazingly successful.

I think the 2nd NZ would also be successful in the same fashion. 

For the average viewer, wow the NZ derbies would be riveting television.

It would also help power the Kiwis.

From what I’ve read there seems to have been a huge shift amongst the younger New Zealand schoolboys rugby playing generation from union to league whilst the older generation are still rusted on union followers especially the all blacks.

Posted
11 minutes ago, warriors 95 said:

Warriors should invite him to vegas as a special guest.

We definitely shouldn’t. The blokes a clown. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Father Gascoigne said:

Not to mention that there's a wee bit of difference when you have two clubs sharing the same city and stadium and another two clubs that would be separated by sea and about a thousand kilometres of land.  

The human being is hardwired to be in opposition to something. The good news is that there is far too much evidence at this point that such division leads to more interest among a larger base of people, rather than the assumption that it would eat into and divide the existing fanbase. 

It's a bigger slamdunk than Perth. 

I’m no fan of the PNG franchise but it looks like it’s going to happen along with Perth which should leave a South Island NZ bid for team #20.

announce all 3 teams staggered over a period of time of say 5-6 years.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, warriors 95 said:

I’m no fan of the PNG franchise but it looks like it’s going to happen along with Perth which should leave a South Island NZ bid for team #20.

announce all 3 teams staggered over a period of time of say 5-6 years.

Would PNG provide the majority of their players? If so, it would only be Perth and NZ seeking recruits from traditional sources. That would mean the move to 20 sides could be quicker than otherwise the case. 

My blog: https://rugbyl.blogspot.co.nz/

It takes wisdom to know when a discussion has run its course.

It takes reasonableness to end that discussion. 

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, RayCee said:

Would PNG provide the majority of their players? If so, it would only be Perth and NZ seeking recruits from traditional sources. That would mean the move to 20 sides could be quicker than otherwise the case. 

I think the majority of the PNG team would be domestic players or players who have come through the hunters pathways system and then went overseas to either super league or other Australian based Queensland cup and NSW cup teams.

incidentally I think we are going to see a big rise in the number of PNG born players signing contracts with super league, championship, Queensland cup and NSW cup sides in the next decade.

Posted
6 hours ago, RayCee said:

Would PNG provide the majority of their players? If so, it would only be Perth and NZ seeking recruits from traditional sources. That would mean the move to 20 sides could be quicker than otherwise the case. 

I doubt PNG will be immediately sourcing many locals in their squad, or if they did, they would soon be recruiting more imports to be competitive.

Perth will be predominantly reliant on imports (non WA) for the next 25 years at least.

NZII I expect will be the only club of the three with a realistic chance of fielding >50% NZ pathway players within the first 5yrs. I actually think they could do it in much less.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Sports Prophet said:

I doubt PNG will be immediately sourcing many locals in their squad, or if they did, they would soon be recruiting more imports to be competitive.

Perth will be predominantly reliant on imports (non WA) for the next 25 years at least.

NZII I expect will be the only club of the three with a realistic chance of fielding >50% NZ pathway players within the first 5yrs. I actually think they could do it in much less.

I think there’s at least a dozen or so players currently at the hunters and other Queensland cup sides that would make a top 30 NRL roster.

the rest would be made up of other kumuls playing in super league and NRL as well as aussie&kiwi imports.

Edited by warriors 95
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, warriors 95 said:

I think there’s at least a dozen or so players currently at the hunters and other Queensland cup sides that would make a top 30 NRL roster.

the rest would be made up of other kumuls playing in super league and NRL as well as aussie&kiwi imports.

If there are a dozen PNG players in second tier which could make a 30 man NRL roster, then why are they wallowing in 2nd tier footy?

Edited by Sports Prophet
  • Like 1
Posted
On 26/11/2024 at 06:47, Sports Prophet said:

If there are a dozen PNG players in second tier which could make a 30 man NRL roster, then why are they wallowing in 2nd tier footy?

That’s a very good question mate as NRL clubs are very hesitant to giving kumuls a chance.

NRL’s lose is super leagues gain.

Posted
13 hours ago, warriors 95 said:

That’s a very good question mate as NRL clubs are very hesitant to giving kumuls a chance.

NRL’s lose is super leagues gain.

I'm not sure they are hesitant, if they are good enough they will get a chance. Fact is a lot of PNG players are still Championship, lower SL and Queensland Cup level type players. While there are always exceptions a lot of the elite PNG players aren't really the size NRL clubs are looking for. Sure the players are tough and physical but there are stacks of players that are just as tough and physical but bigger and more skilfull too.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Damien said:

I'm not sure they are hesitant, if they are good enough they will get a chance. Fact is a lot of PNG players are still Championship, lower SL and Queensland Cup level type players. While there are always exceptions a lot of the elite PNG players aren't really the size NRL clubs are looking for. Sure the players are tough and physical but there are stacks of players that are just as tough and physical but bigger and more skilfull too.

I think it’s a fair point to say that although the kumuls are very tough and physical they are very, very raw which doesn’t help when you compare them to others coming through the Australian pathways system since the age of 6-7 years old.

but the potential is there.

Posted
On 29/11/2024 at 04:17, warriors 95 said:

Well done roosters and more positive news for RL in New Zealand.

What does this mean? It just seems to have appeared out of the blue, so can you explain the story?

Posted
On 26/11/2024 at 16:31, Sports Prophet said:

I doubt PNG will be immediately sourcing many locals in their squad, or if they did, they would soon be recruiting more imports to be competitive.

Perth will be predominantly reliant on imports (non WA) for the next 25 years at least.

NZII I expect will be the only club of the three with a realistic chance of fielding >50% NZ pathway players within the first 5yrs. I actually think they could do it in much less.

That's optimistic. I'd go as far as saying until the end of time.

NSW/QLD are ground zero for player development. PNG will never be able to match it. Ditto WA. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Father Gascoigne said:

That's optimistic. I'd go as far as saying until the end of time.

NSW/QLD are ground zero for player development. PNG will never be able to match it. Ditto WA. 

PNG could dramatically change if the right pathways are put in place.

Posted
40 minutes ago, warriors 95 said:

PNG could dramatically change if the right pathways are put in place.

Are the athletes there? I'm sure some are but it's not all about pathways. PNG have been a RL nation for decades, are fanatical about the game, have the Hunters in the Queensland Cup etc. They have pathways in abundance compared to somewhere like Fiji but NRL clubs will take a punt on a 6'2" porter who has never played the game because they have the raw talent, are built like the proverbial brick outhouse and can run 100 metres quick as. I generalise but you get the point.

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Damien said:

Are the athletes there? I'm sure some are but it's not all about pathways. PNG have been a RL nation for decades, are fanatical about the game, have the Hunters in the Queensland Cup etc. They have pathways in abundance compared to somewhere like Fiji but NRL clubs will take a punt on a 6'2" porter who has never played the game because they have the raw talent, are built like the proverbial brick outhouse and can run 100 metres quick as. I generalise but you get the point.

The pathways in Fiji are primarily RU ones which sees NRL clubs poaching either schoolboys or u20’s that play 7’s or the 15 aside format while PNG need youth programs and pathways with the hunters playing in Queensland competitions at u17,u19 and u21 levels.

Posted (edited)

There is no reason why PNG and a second NZ side can’t draw on local talent very quickly indeed. I have no idea about Perth. From the little I know they sound like London. Take good games there and lots of people will watch them, without having deep roots in TGG. 
 

Of course, the NRL knows best when it comes to its own competition. 

Edited by Exiled Wiganer
Posted
37 minutes ago, Exiled Wiganer said:

There is no reason why PNG and a second NZ side can’t draw on local talent very quickly indeed. I have no idea about Perth. From the little I know they sound like London. Take good games there and lots of people will watch them, without having deep roots in TGG. 
 

Of course, the NRL knows best when it comes to its own competition. 

Don’t quote me but I think I’m right in saying that WA has more juniors than Victoria.

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted

I’ve been in NZ for a week now and am impressed with how many NRL jerseys I see around the north island. I’m yet to visit Auckland but I expect to see some there too.

  • Like 8
Posted
10 hours ago, Copa said:

I’ve been in NZ for a week now and am impressed with how many NRL jerseys I see around the north island. I’m yet to visit Auckland but I expect to see some there too.

One of the gripes I've seen RU fans have is the amount of NRL jerseys youngsters wear in NZ compared to RU. All signs that the next generation is more and more RL focussed.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.