All Activity
- Past hour
-
Will that be at home? Great to see both of them back.
-
Cricket - Matches & General Discussion Thread
WN83 replied to John Drake's topic in Any Other Business / Any Other Sports
I'm a right mardy when things aren't going well and usually just turn it off but I love watching Brook and Smith bat, so left the tv on at 85/5 or whatever it was. Glad I did now, they've been exceptional! If the Indians don't win this game from that position they were in, they'll be wondering how they can get one on the board. Plenty of work for England to do yet though. -
Interview with FFRXIII President Dominique Baloup
Eddie replied to Gomersall's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
The difference is that origin is massively popular and a money spinner. If it was as popular as an England v France test match they wouldn’t play it. -
Interview with FFRXIII President Dominique Baloup
Eddie replied to Gomersall's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Players could probably do with a break. Also I suspect an end of season England v France test a week before a three game Ashes series starts would be a loss maker. -
Okay, just never really noticed it. Thanks fir the clarification
-
He will be long gone in 2-3 years, he hasn't got the money himself and can't get anybody else interested. Axiom not happening anytime this decade either. Bottom two side, crowds tanking, stadium falling apart, youth systems and womens team shot to pieces. Haven't even got a working website. Back done to a Grade B and clingling on next year. Only one show in the Wakefield area for years to come.
-
Here's a very reluctant confession. After watching (and playing) Rugby League for over 50 years, this game was the first one where I felt the play wasn't of a high enough standard to be deemed ''Super League''. The players skill level (particularly passing accuracy) was very poor, the game error strewn as a result and the decision making, especially amongst the Castleford players was woeful. I hope it's not a sign of worse things to come. But, it left me with an ominous chill, a frightful sense of foreboding, like the first breath of a harsh and bitterly cold winter.
-
London Broncos (Merged Threads)
17 stone giant replied to Magic XIII's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
I know you've upset some of the pro-London crew with that statement, but I think based on how things are right now after 45 years of RL in London, it's quite hard to disagree. The key point being "enough". It doesn't mean that there isn't SOME interest. Of course there's always some interest for everything, in every area, but is it enough to sustain things at the level required? I think it's irrelevant for certain posters to say that there's some boys in London who like playing rugby league. Big deal. There are boys playing rugby union at my local park, but in no way could Southampton currently hope to support a Premiership RU team. Likewise there is an ice rink in Gosport where a few passionate people play ice hockey, but again it's not enough to enter the UK Elite League (or whatever it's called nowadays). If it's a no brainer that London can support top level RL, why can't Manchester or Liverpool? Both are cities on the doorstep of the RL heartlands, so surely it should be easier to make a success of them than in London, which is a bit of an island in RL terms. I would love RL to be successful in London and elsewhere, but there are only so many excuses you can make for it not doing so. When you think about it, sport is a very strange beast when it comes to locations. I doubt anyone can really fully explain why certain places have things and others don't. Why does Leicester have a top RU team, but Derby and Nottingham don't? Why can't you transfer those same ingredients and make Derby and Nottingham have a team? Are people that different just a few miles apart? Why does Salford have a RL team (for now) but Manchester doesn't? Why doesn't London (I think I'm correct) have a top level ice hockey team, but nearby Guildford does? It's one of those mysteries that's clearly not as simple as just replicating what happens in one place, in another. Otherwise every area would have high level teams from all sports. -
SL clubs look to reinstate Nigel Wood.
Archie Gordon replied to The 4 of Us's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Fair. I should have started a new paragraph for the second sentence. -
The NRL Round 18 Thread
american replied to THE RED ROOSTER's topic in The Australian Rugby League Forum
adam reynolds with truly one of the kicking performances of all time -
SL clubs look to reinstate Nigel Wood.
Damien replied to The 4 of Us's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
He never said they did. -
There was a set last night by Cas where every Giants ptb was slowed down.....while Cas were desperately trying to score a try late in the game to get a draw. At the same time the Giants were playing the ball as slowly as possible, I couldnt fathom how a message wasnt sent out to get the hell out of the tackle as quickly as possuble.
-
No. I think people see it as a problem because of the perception of there being five drives and a kick, then the other team does five drives and a kick and so on, and it can seem like there's not much variety, and this is a way to produce variety. I think the actual problem is that RL used to be mostly about what happened between the tackles, and now it's mostly about what happens during the tackle - who wins the wrestle, how long can you delay the next play the ball for without being penalised, and so on. A big part of gameplay now is about winning the collision and getting to the next collision faster than the other team wants (attack) or slower (defence). Very much like phiggins suggestion of second attacker joins means the tackle is completed, although as with all rule changes, there will be unintended consequences as coaches find ways to take advantage of it. I think there's a separate argument that the game has become too difficult to referee (compared with most other sports) and too difficult for most adults, even very fit young men, to play.
-
Absolutely hopeless, another bout of me shouting at the screen! The combination of poor resolution play-back and self indulgent/self-aggrandising video ref's is going to kill the game if allowed to go on unchecked. So amateurish, so boring, so annoying. When you add in the 3 ''decision pending'' oscillations of the Hughie Green clap-o-meter, (when the decision has already been made, before the clap-o-meter was even flashed up on the screen) nonsense, it's enough to make my hair fall out. God, bless us and spare us!
-
SL clubs look to reinstate Nigel Wood.
Archie Gordon replied to The 4 of Us's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Let's not rewrite history. There's no evidence at all that IMG wanted minimum standards P&R rather than grading. There were plenty of folks on this board that wanted that, however. -
Scrums in Union are not competitive, most end up with a penalty and non against the head. It's just they put more emphasis on the aspect of the scrum. On league scrums I would stop non forwards standing in unless they have changed position and have the ability to push because it would mean forwards using up energy in the scrum thus creates gaps through tiring players