Jump to content

Whisky


Recommended Posts


Love Laphroig 10yr, probably a little too much according to the misses. Just ordered a bottle of Ardberg 10 yr. Anybody tried/opinions?

Ardbeg is quite nice.  A bit less peaty and a lesser hit than Laphroaig.

"When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt; run in little circles, wave your arms and shout"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just went to get a bottle of Jamesons and also came back with a bottle of Sailor Jerrys rum. This is some good stuff

If we're talking rum, several supermarkets now sell Angostura 1919, which is extremely nice. On personal experience, avoid Havana Club; it tasted harsh and with a metallic aftertaste to me.

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a regular in airports. As one or two of you know, I'm on tour, with my band. Everywhere I go within Europe, and in the US there is massive drive to shift Haig whisky with adverts and stands featuring David Beckham.

Anyon tried it? His endorsement is as authentic as most of the Celtic tattoos seen in Superleague. I reckon he's a Tizer supper.

The Unicorn is not a Goose,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been given a bottle of "St George" English whisky for my birthday. It's distiller and matured in Norfolk.

It's a little early to try it but I'll let you know what I think it's like.

Ron Banks

Midlands Hurricanes and Barrow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been given a bottle of "St George" English whisky for my birthday. It's distiller and matured in Norfolk.

It's a little early to try it but I'll let you know what I think it's like.

It'd be interesting seeing someone else's view on this, I've had some and I'll share my opinions later to save me tainting your opinion before you try it.

"When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt; run in little circles, wave your arms and shout"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'd be interesting seeing someone else's view on this, I've had some and I'll share my opinions later to save me tainting your opinion before you try it.

I've had worse and I suspect that with a bit of age some of the corners will be knocked off.

I'm guessing from the pale colour that it's 3 year old and hasn't had time to pick up the colour from the cask.

Having said that, with it not being Scotch does it have to be at least 3 years old like scotch has to be?

There is no mention of which casks they have used for the maturation but there is some sweetness on the palate.

On the box it says that the water is from the distillers garden but on the bottle it says "demineralised" water. Why would you want to use that? Natural spring water must be full of trace elements, which must add some depth to the flavour

So in conclusion it has some novelty value anrd is drinkable. One of the main drawbacks in starting a new distillery must be letting your investment just sit there for x years with no revenue and year on year the Angels taking their share.

I'll try it again when it has a bit of age on it

So what did you think?

Ron Banks

Midlands Hurricanes and Barrow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone on here ever tried Japanese whisky, I've read about them winning various awards but never given them a try?

There are some very nice ones, all depends on your taste though, if you only like Islay single malts then Japanese whisky will disappoint you. The best Japanese ones are all Speyside equivalents.  The one I did enjoy when offered was a Suntory, a bit light for my taste but still very nice.  In terms of sheer value for money though, it's a poor offering as you'll typically pay half again what you would for an equivalent Scottish whisky.

"When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt; run in little circles, wave your arms and shout"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone on here ever tried Japanese whisky, I've read about them winning various awards but never given them a try?

I tried one of the cheaper blends, and it was okay, but nothing special. The more pricey ones are well-regarded.

 

My dad has a sampler of a whisky called Valhalla`s Goat. God alone knows what it'll be like.

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had worse and I suspect that with a bit of age some of the corners will be knocked off.

I'm guessing from the pale colour that it's 3 year old and hasn't had time to pick up the colour from the cask.

Having said that, with it not being Scotch does it have to be at least 3 years old like scotch has to be?

There is no mention of which casks they have used for the maturation but there is some sweetness on the palate.

On the box it says that the water is from the distillers garden but on the bottle it says "demineralised" water. Why would you want to use that? Natural spring water must be full of trace elements, which must add some depth to the flavour

So in conclusion it has some novelty value anrd is drinkable. One of the main drawbacks in starting a new distillery must be letting your investment just sit there for x years with no revenue and year on year the Angels taking their share.

I'll try it again when it has a bit of age on it

So what did you think?

Much the same as you but I was less generous in my views.  It smells and tastes like a barely legal whisky, just over the minimum threshold that allows it to be called whisky rather than "alcohol".  It's poorer in taste than a cheap bottle of Bells blended and has all the stink of unaged alcohol.  It did taste a bit like sherry casks for me but then that might have been wishful thinking.

 

In many areas of England they have to demineralise it because of the excessively high calcium in the water that just ends up polluting the taste of the whisky towards chalkiness.  The finished whisky did taste like it had been over-filtered, maybe it had come out too strong and they wanted to get it to their target ABV for the bottling, either that or they had to aggressively filter it because of the calcium.

 

On your point on investment, surely the backers understand that brand is everything with whisky and that if your first bottling is a bit like meths then that will just stick in the minds of those who might never look at your older aged bottlings in a few years time.  I'd have made it clear that it was either going to be a blend for the first bottling, with a reputable partner for the blend, or it waits until at least 8 years old and preferably 10.

 

Edit: Yes, it has to reach the minimum age anywhere to be classified as whisky in the UK market.

"When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt; run in little circles, wave your arms and shout"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried one of the cheaper blends, and it was okay, but nothing special. The more pricey ones are well-regarded.

 

My dad has a sampler of a whisky called Valhalla`s Goat. God alone knows what it'll be like.

The Japanese one I had was, I'm pretty sure, a Yamazaki.

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much the same as you but I was less generous in my views.  It smells and tastes like a barely legal whisky, just over the minimum threshold that allows it to be called whisky rather than "alcohol".  It's poorer in taste than a cheap bottle of Bells blended and has all the stink of unaged alcohol.  It did taste a bit like sherry casks for me but then that might have been wishful thinking.

 

In many areas of England they have to demineralise it because of the excessively high calcium in the water that just ends up polluting the taste of the whisky towards chalkiness.  The finished whisky did taste like it had been over-filtered, maybe it had come out too strong and they wanted to get it to their target ABV for the bottling, either that or they had to aggressively filter it because of the calcium.

 

On your point on investment, surely the backers understand that brand is everything with whisky and that if your first bottling is a bit like meths then that will just stick in the minds of those who might never look at your older aged bottlings in a few years time.  I'd have made it clear that it was either going to be a blend for the first bottling, with a reputable partner for the blend, or it waits until at least 8 years old and preferably 10.

 

Edit: Yes, it has to reach the minimum age anywhere to be classified as whisky in the UK market.

 

Did you both have the same one?  There seem to be about half a dozen variants of St George out there.

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you both have the same one?  There seem to be about half a dozen variants of St George out there.

It's probably all the same but bottled for individual retailers. Mine was Marks and Spencer.

Ron Banks

Midlands Hurricanes and Barrow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Went to a blind tasting last night, I ended up rating Sainsburys Taste the Difference Highland Malt the highest - will save me a few bob this year!

I spotted that their own-label single malt had made a comeback when I was in there yesterday. I will definitely try the Highland, but I hope they bring back the Islay one too. 

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is where the proper whisky snobs get it wrong, they go by what the label says rather than how the whisky tastes.  If you chose it from a blind tasting then it's irrelevant if it's £20 or £200 a bottle.

"When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt; run in little circles, wave your arms and shout"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is where the proper whisky snobs get it wrong, they go by what the label says rather than how the whisky tastes.  If you chose it from a blind tasting then it's irrelevant if it's £20 or £200 a bottle.

The expensive bottles often cost that much due to rarity, rather than the quality of the contents. I bought a bottle of St Magdalene many years ago for a perfectly normal single malt price. That same bottle would now be offered on sale for hundreds of pounds. The whisky inside hasn't got better; it is just that there are very few left from this now-defunct distillery.

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spotted that their own-label single malt had made a comeback when I was in there yesterday. I will definitely try the Highland, but I hope they bring back the Islay one too. 

Just looked at the Sainsbury website. A Speyside is listed as well as the Highland, but no Islay. Yet.

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.