Jump to content

UK Anti-Doping investigation into a senior rugby league official

Bedford Roughyed
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bedford Roughyed

Bedford Roughyed

Posted
Posted (edited)

https://x.com/MattHughesMedia/status/1865004817195692114

Quote

UK Anti-Doping investigating allegations that a senior rugby league official supplied recreational drugs to players.

 

Edited by Bedford Roughyed

With the best, thats a good bit of PR, though I would say the Bedford team, theres, like, you know, 13 blokes who can get together at the weekend to have a game together, which doesnt point to expansion of the game. Point, yeah go on!

  • Bedford Roughyed changed the title to UK Anti-Doping investigation into a senior rugby league official

Bedford Roughyed

Bedford Roughyed

Posted
  • Author
Posted
57 minutes ago, Sports Prophet said:

https://www.totalrl.com/uk-anti-doping-investigates-rfl-official-following-drug-supply-allegation/
 

still very present on this site

Gone too?

With the best, thats a good bit of PR, though I would say the Bedford team, theres, like, you know, 13 blokes who can get together at the weekend to have a game together, which doesnt point to expansion of the game. Point, yeah go on!

gingerjon

gingerjon

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Bedford Roughyed said:

Gone too?

Has now.

The Yahoo page it was on earlier as well - GONE.

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

gingerjon

gingerjon

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, RigbyLuger said:

Maybe someone from TotalRL can explain the mystery of the missing story!

All the secondary ones were just quoting directly  and indirectly from the Telegraph. Once the Telegraph pull it, they are essentially putting out a potentially very litigious story that they themselves have not sourced.

  • Thanks 1

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Damien

Damien

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, gingerjon said:

All the secondary ones were just quoting directly  and indirectly from the Telegraph. Once the Telegraph pull it, they are essentially putting out a potentially very litigious story that they themselves have not sourced.

That is all the RL media seem to do now. For any story that someone does it is just repeated, sometimes practically word for word, over the course of the next couple of days.

  • Like 1
Yorks Tim

Yorks Tim

Posted
Posted

Anyone remember the pictures supposedly of a table in a rugby club after a celebration apparently covered in a white dust residue? Couple of seasons ago?

Was laughed off at the time.

 

The Future is League

The Future is League

Posted
Posted
On 06/12/2024 at 20:36, RigbyLuger said:

Does official mean someone in the RFL or match official? Not giving the Telegraph any money when they ignore RL 99.99% of the time.

What a surprise that union loving Telegraph trying to put the boot into Rugby League

gingerjon

gingerjon

Posted
Posted

Before everyone starts boring on that this is some hypocrisy from the Telegraph. At least a dozen stories from the last few years about drug use in rugby union published by them.

  • Like 3

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

The Blues Ox

The Blues Ox

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, JohnM said:

We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Please try searching above or visiting our home page.

I probably should have just posted the screenshot but that was the only place where the story stayed up a lot longer than the others. 

  • Thanks 1
JohnM

JohnM

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, The Blues Ox said:

I probably should have just posted the screenshot but that was the only place where the story stayed up a lot longer than the others. 

Better safe than sorry. Clearly sensitive and possibly actionable.

  • Like 1
The Blues Ox

The Blues Ox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnM said:

Better safe than sorry. Clearly sensitive and possibly actionable.

Really wasn't much in the article that could get anyone in trouble so you wonder if it is UKAD worried about it affecting their case.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.