Jump to content
John Drake

The General 'Toronto Wolfpack' Discussion Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, Robin Evans said:

Aye.... Argyle played his risks well didn't he?

He is gone, what was is not what currently is.  This is a whole new bushel of apples now, not last years harvest.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SL17 said:

No no no.. He will only pay the debts if they remain in SL. No SL, no LiVolsi.

If this is the same club.... pay whats owed.

if its a new club, start in L1 or go.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SL17 said:

Unfortunately it’s the wrong mentality to use. Everything revolves around SL, no contingency should the answer be no..

The tension increases...the paperwork presented today will make it hard for the SL owners to say No...the potential for riches is just too great...they would be crazy to reject it.   I believe this will go down, one way or another, as a 'turning point' for the game.  Its either move forward into the darkness with a strong step and a determined attitude, or hide in the shadows like a frightened lamb waiting for the inevitable outcome as the predators circle. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Robin Evans said:

If this is the same club.... pay whats owed.

if its a new club, start in L1 or go.

The club won't exist to pay whats owed unless the new owner comes in and he will only come in to a club in Super League.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tommygilf said:

The club won't exist to pay whats owed unless the new owner comes in and he will only come in to a club in Super League.

I don't know why some of the posters are sooooooo confused over this Tommy...its been made very clear...its like some twisted form of willful blindness or something.   The gig is up...its take it or leave it...go for it or run and hide in the shadows...no in-between now...that is probably what they are struggling with.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Kayakman said:

I don't know why some of the posters are sooooooo confused over this Tommy...its been made very clear...its like some twisted form of willful blindness or something.   The gig is up...its take it or leave it...go for it or run and hide in the shadows...no in-between now...that is probably what they are struggling with.

It is a bit annoying going over the same point repeatedly, especially when it is so simple.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Derwent said:

The NFL themselves have stated that they have lost money but are prepared to stand them in the pursuit of a more lucrative TV contract.

As you can read here, they decline to state whether they have or have not lost money, but "the NFL’s gate revenue from ticket buyers at London’s Wembley Stadium has regularly exceeded $30 million in recent years" and they have new and improved UK TV contract now too.  So the series becoming profitable is only a matter of time if it hasn't happened already.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

It is a bit annoying going over the same point repeatedly, especially when it is so simple.

Patience Tommy...we have a moral obligation to bring them along, albeit slowly....patience Tommy...we are doing the work of the Rugby Gods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SL17 said:

Then based on the plan of SL or nothing. Leaves TWP in a vulnerable position with P&R  still in place, or would you suggest a 10 year exemption from relegation?

Are you familiar with Plato and his 'Allegory of the Cave'?...it is pertinent here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Harry Stottle said:

Does that include the NRL decision makers?

If RFL/SL rejects the Wolfpack this week, will V'landys come over the hill on one of his White Chargers to save the day?

Or could it be NIMBY sympathy?

Without a doubt, I have seen Phil Gould who is a mouth piece for the NRL these days say unequivocally and unprompted the NRL needs a strong Super League. V`landy`s, Gould, Abdo, Bennet et.al. no doubt have a grand vision for League and SL will be part of it. Please don` t take that as being patronising.

The Private Equity valuation of the NRL was released yesterday $3.1 b and they are talking about selling a 20% stake, now there has been chatter about buying a stake in SL. Don`t think it will happen yet, I don`t think they are ready, too much to sort out here after twenty years of sleepwalking while the bloody afl got under our guard. The NRL has got issues to deal with as well.

Nothing to do with sympathy Harry, its business, we`ve got a kick-ar$e product we want to take to the world, toes are going to get trodden on.

P.S. Had a letter published in the LoveRugbyLeague mailbox today, you never did give me your opinion.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SL17 said:

No no no.. He will only pay the debts if they remain in SL. No SL, no LiVolsi.

It's a negotiating starting point. He wants to take over ownership but wants the club to be in SL when he does (as that is where they were pre-withdrawal). If you act as if you are serious at the start your position will be taken more seriously. If he indicates potential for lessening his demands publicly then he makes it less likely that he will get something close to what he would prefer as the other side know they can get him to budge before the negotiating even begins. Unless TWP are facing a definite, no matter what is offered refusal of the application to return then both sides will make some level of compromise during the process before the application is either approved or rejected. No doubt similar hard line stances are being espoused at the SL clubs' end, its just that with more than one voice to be heard in the SL/RFL decision making we aren't hearing it as there isn't a single determined position from that side yet.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kayakman said:

Patience Tommy...we have a moral obligation to bring them along, albeit slowly....patience Tommy...we are doing the work of the Rugby Gods.

We shall save them in spite of themselves!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, TIWIT said:

We shall save them in spite of themselves!

Its our civic rugby duty to try and help them and show them the way...they are in the shadows but we shall cast light upon them!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So now we sort of know there will be no rugby crowds until the spring.

You'd think that makes it more likely SL clubs say no to Toronto given there will be less income flowing into the clubs between now and then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Man of Kent said:

So now we sort of know there will be no rugby crowds until the spring.

You'd think that makes it more likely SL clubs say no to Toronto given there will be less income flowing into the clubs between now and then.

My God you are starting to sound desperate...pulling at any and all straws.  Relax, its going to play itself out...wait for Friday.  Its all going to be Okay...its all going to work out.  Prepare yourself mentally though so it doesn't come as a complete shocker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Man of Kent said:

So now we sort of know there will be no rugby crowds until the spring.

You'd think that makes it more likely SL clubs say no to Toronto given there will be less income flowing into the clubs between now and then.

I'd say it makes them more likely to say yes to Toronto, provided they don't take a TV share in year 1. If Toronto folds and the clubs have to admit Leigh or whoever then the existing SL clubs will be down about 150k each. My guess is the TV funds is a bargaining chip for the new TWP owners, not a red line. 

The only other option is to run with 11, which until now at least has had no public support from any of the SL clubs.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Toby Chopra said:

I'd say it makes them more likely to say yes to Toronto, provided they don't take a TV share in year 1. If Toronto folds and the clubs have to admit Leigh or whoever then the existing SL clubs will be down about 150k each. My guess is the TV funds is a bargaining chip for the new TWP owners, not a red line. 

The only other option is to run with 11, which until now at least has had no public support from any of the SL clubs.

Of course Toronto has been, and always will be, reasonable in all things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I am going to say something that I hope resonates with most people on here.

Irrespective of the decision to re-admit TWP or not I will still offer my unconditional support to the game of RL and to my club Cas Tigers.

Also I will still make comment on issues across the game and continue to have a great debate with others on here that either share my view or not.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Toby Chopra said:

I'd say it makes them more likely to say yes to Toronto, provided they don't take a TV share in year 1. If Toronto folds and the clubs have to admit Leigh or whoever then the existing SL clubs will be down about 150k each. My guess is the TV funds is a bargaining chip for the new TWP owners, not a red line. 

The only other option is to run with 11, which until now at least has had no public support from any of the SL clubs.

But isn't Toronto demanding central funding?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Toby Chopra said:

I'd say it makes them more likely to say yes to Toronto, provided they don't take a TV share in year 1. If Toronto folds and the clubs have to admit Leigh or whoever then the existing SL clubs will be down about 150k each. My guess is the TV funds is a bargaining chip for the new TWP owners, not a red line. 

The only other option is to run with 11, which until now at least has had no public support from any of the SL clubs.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the outcome is something like Toronto get 75% of what the other Super League clubs get. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If twp don't get there place in SL back ?? Who is it everyone thinks leigh should replace them in my eyes it should be fev who replace's them they were runners up in the million pound game in other sports if the winner gets demoted the runner up always takes there place as the winner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, plug said:

If twp don't get there place in SL back ?? Who is it everyone thinks leigh should replace them in my eyes it should be fev who replace's them they were runners up in the million pound game in other sports if the winner gets demoted the runner up always takes there place as the winner

No-one

Go with 11

Edited by Robin Evans
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Adelaide Tiger said:

Well I am going to say something that I hope resonates with most people on here.

Irrespective of the decision to re-admit TWP or not I will still offer my unconditional support to the game of RL and to my club Cas Tigers.

Also I will still make comment on issues across the game and continue to have a great debate with others on here that either share my view or not.

Aye.... apart from that cas bit you make decent contributions here😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, dkw said:

A quick google to see if they make or lose money on the London games appears to be .....inconclusive ha ha. Its very difficult to see how they do, though one article says Jacksonville wanted 2 games here in 2020 to make up for losses while their stadium is being built:-

Though again, that could infer loads of things, it could be them playing on the road elsewhere loses them more moeny than they do in London etc.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.pjstar.com/sports/20160930/nfl-game-in-london-sell-out-every-time---and-still-lose-money%3ftemplate=ampart
 

 


I’m not prejudiced, I hate everybody equally

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...