The General 'Toronto Wolfpack' Discussion Thread

[TIWIT]

2 hours ago, Oxford said:

Never said you did just said it's rife, not unusal and part of the make up of the forum.

And now for the health warning

Devoted football fans experience 'dangerous' levels of stress, suggests study

"Dr. Martha Newson, a researcher at the Centre for the Study of Social Cohesion at Oxford, said: "Fans who are strongly fused with their team - that is, have a strong sense of being 'one' with their team - experience the greatest physiological stress response when watching a match, Fans who are more casual supporters also experience stress but not so extremely."

So "Blow That Whistle Ref!"

 

And a non-fan experiences no stress at all. Jeez, I would have thought that was kinda obvious.

[Lowdesert]

37 minutes ago, TboneFromTO said:

They have been asking publicly since late November, I would imagine they've been asking the league since before going public with it.  It's not sudden at all really.

IMO semantics.  Considering the season starts in Feb then I would class 2 months before too short a time and sudden enough.  During that time an agreement has to be made and also resources committed to, to source and engage players and/or staff.  This plus training, relocations etc etc.

Would you say 2 months is adequate to do all the above?

This should have been sorted before the 2019 season even started.

[Loup]

If you put aside the TWP angle for a moment, why is raising the salary cap a bad idea? Younger prospects/players not in the top squad are being paid peanuts. I have listened to three years of griping that there is only a finite pool of good northern lads in the sport and expansion teams will poach them away.

What if there was a bit less of the wage suppression so more of the northern sons could afford to play full time?

What if less wealthy clubs used the attention that TWP are bringing to the start of the season to up their sponsorships?

Perhaps TWP wouldn't be the only beneficiaries.

 

[TIWIT]

1 hour ago, John Drake said:

We will not allow this thread to become a troll’s paradise. 

if you just want to bang on endlessly about how much you hate Toronto, and relentlessly criticise everything the club does in order to inflame it’s supporters who post on here, making the same points over and over and over again until you drive rational people away, get this message: you are not welcome on this forum.

One person has now been banned for the above behaviour. Others will follow if they indulge in the same activity.

For the record, it’s no longer worth responding to any post made by ‘NOS4A2’ because they are no longer a member of this forum.

Anyone who has any issues with this, please PM or email me to discuss privately. I don’t want this thread dragging off topic into a discussion on the forum rules either.

Stick to discussing Toronto Wolfpack, in a rational and even handed manner.

Thanks.

Herding cats, John, herding cats.

[Oxford]

9 minutes ago, TIWIT said:

Jeez, I would have thought that was kinda obvious.

I think it kind'a the level of stress not the general idea of it!

            !

[Loup]

1 minute ago, Lowdesert said:

IMO semantics.  Considering the season starts in Feb then I would class 2 months before too short a time and sudden enough.  During that time an agreement has to be made and also resources committed to, to source and engage players and/or staff.  This plus training, relocations etc etc.

Would you say 2 months is adequate to do all the above?

This should have been sorted before the 2019 season even started.

Well yes, but TWP weren't told they would even get admitted to SL until three days before the MPG.

They were talking to SBW but unlikely they'd be signing new players until Elstone got off the fence.

You can blame TWP for bad timing but it came from both sides. Given the ridiculous concessions they were forced to accept, they likely weren't in a position to demand salary cap changes.

[TboneFromTO]

1 minute ago, Lowdesert said:

IMO semantics.  Considering the season starts in Feb then I would class 2 months before too short a time and sudden enough.  During that time an agreement has to be made and also resources committed to, to source and engage players and/or staff.  This plus training, relocations etc etc.

Would you say 2 months is adequate to do all the above?

This should have been sorted before the 2019 season even started.

I believe they were in talks with super league before they went public.   They went public about a month and a half after being admitted into super league.

Don't talk about what should have been sorted before with the twp before 2019 season started.  Remember we were 2 weeks out of the  championship grand final and the leagues were saying they might not go up even if they win?  

Someone is dragging their feet and i don't think it's been the twp

[Loup]

3 minutes ago, TboneFromTO said:

I believe they were in talks with super league before they went public.   They went public about a month and a half after being admitted into super league.

Don't talk about what should have been sorted before with the twp before 2019 season started.  Remember we were 2 weeks out of the  championship grand final and the leagues were saying they might not go up even if they win?  

Someone is dragging their feet and i don't think it's been the twp

Oh snap.

[TIWIT]

5 minutes ago, Loup said:

If you put aside the TWP angle for a moment, why is raising the salary cap a bad idea? Younger prospects/players not in the top squad are being paid peanuts. I have listened to three years of griping that there is only a finite pool of good northern lads in the sport and expansion teams will poach them away.

What if there was a bit less of the wage suppression so more of the northern sons could afford to play full time?

What if less wealthy clubs used the attention that TWP are bringing to the start of the season to up their sponsorships?

Perhaps TWP wouldn't be the only beneficiaries.

 

Rather than giving Toronto special dispensation why not just bump the salary cap say 5% for all teams? Not everyone has to spend to it but it might allow teams a bit more leeway in signing new players. I think everyone agrees TWP aren't going to use that money to make another splashy signing but rather to add depth to their roster. And surely no one should object to giving more lads a full-time paycheque.

[Kayakman]

1 hour ago, Lowdesert said:

Genuine questions mate.  Do you think lashing out 3m was the best way forward for TWP and also considering squad requirements for 2020?  

Please rephrase your question.

[Davo5]

2 hours ago, Lowdesert said:

 

Genuine questions mate.  Do you think lashing out 3m was the best way forward for TWP and also considering squad requirements for 2020?  

Sky certainly seem to think so going by their advert for the new season.

[Lowdesert]

1 hour ago, TboneFromTO said:

I believe they were in talks with super league before they went public.   They went public about a month and a half after being admitted into super league.

Don't talk about what should have been sorted before with the twp before 2019 season started.  Remember we were 2 weeks out of the  championship grand final and the leagues were saying they might not go up even if they win?  

Someone is dragging their feet and i don't think it's been the twp

Who’s saying TWP have been dragging their heels?

This forum is also for free speech mate.  

[Lowdesert]

37 minutes ago, Kayakman said:

Please rephrase your question.

My question was really about spending on a stronger squad and not on an individual.  SBW could be injured and out of it in one game but spending on some stronger players throughout the squad might just keep them in the league.  It seems the opposite has been the focus and I don’t think that’s a model adopted by any other club.

 

 

[Lowdesert]

13 minutes ago, Davo5 said:

Sky certainly seem to think so going by their advert for the new season.

Yes, I get the commercial side of it Dave.  Certainly good, but imo a big gamble running with a squad shallow in quality. 

[Kayakman]

2 minutes ago, Lowdesert said:

My question was really about spending on a stronger squad and not on an individual.  SBW could be injured and out of it in one game but spending on some stronger players throughout the squad might just keep them in the league.  It seems the opposite has been the focus and I don’t think that’s a model adopted by any other club.

 

 

Fair enough but I honestly think TWP are looking to do both actually.

[TboneFromTO]

8 minutes ago, Lowdesert said:

Who’s saying TWP have been dragging their heels?

This forum is also for free speech mate.  

You did when you criticized the "sudden" nature of the ask.  

Free speech doesn't equal freedom from consequences of speech.  You are free to make a factually incorrect comment. And I am free to tell you it's wrong.

 

Also internet forums do not equate free speech - there is a set of rules governing these forums (not that I believe you or I have breached them - just riffing on the theme).  Try swearing for example!

[Lowdesert]

2 minutes ago, Kayakman said:

Fair enough but I honestly think TWP are looking to do both actually.

You’ll get no animosity towards TWP from me but I think both the RFL and TWP have just been slow off the mark.  TWP going down would create more harm than good for future expansion attempts.  

Its too long a season for all SL clubs let alone new teams.  Difficult choice choosing which should come first - commercial money coming in or success on the pitch.  Maybe TWPs was the gamble and the plan was to chase dispensation after SBW.  

[Bob8]

1 hour ago, TIWIT said:

Rather than giving Toronto special dispensation why not just bump the salary cap say 5% for all teams? Not everyone has to spend to it but it might allow teams a bit more leeway in signing new players. I think everyone agrees TWP aren't going to use that money to make another splashy signing but rather to add depth to their roster. And surely no one should object to giving more lads a full-time paycheque.

It comes back to what the salary cap is for.

If is it to give the traditional clubs the best possible chance, then there can be no dispensation - thems the rules.

If it is to lessen (to the forum thickies - that does not mean eliminate) the chance of clubs going bankrupt, then it is arguable.

If it is to give an even chance, there must be dispensation as being in Canada is a major disadvantage.

[Davo5]

16 minutes ago, Lowdesert said:

Yes, I get the commercial side of it Dave.  Certainly good, but imo a big gamble running with a squad shallow in quality. 

Your probably right but his signing is a genuine benefit to Superleague with a huge surge in media/public attention and with Sky rmaking him & Toronto a feature of their advertising campaign,who knows we have a genuine bargaining chip when the next broadcasting deal comes around.

[Lowdesert]

4 minutes ago, TboneFromTO said:

You did when you criticized the "sudden" nature of the ask.  

Free speech doesn't equal freedom from consequences of speech.  You are free to make a factually incorrect comment. And I am free to tell you it's wrong.

 

Also internet forums do not equate free speech - there is a set of rules governing these forums (not that I believe you or I have breached them - just riffing on the theme).  Try swearing for example!

Like I said, 2 months planning isn’t fair on themselves to achieve any plan. TWP have not been forthright until a few weeks ago, which is different to being in discussions.  We also aren’t privy to those discussions, which Elstone might be.  Not enough time to recruit and get their targets at all.

[Lowdesert]

2 minutes ago, Davo5 said:

Your probably right but his signing is a genuine benefit to Superleague with a huge surge in media/public attention and with Sky rmaking him & Toronto a feature of their advertising campaign,who knows we have a genuine bargaining chip when the next broadcasting deal comes around.

Yep.  Agree with all that mate.

[aj1908]

toronto should suck it up and not ask for any special rules.  they wont get relegated anyway.

noble has to learn to play by the rules.

[TboneFromTO]

1 minute ago, aj1908 said:

toronto should suck it up and not ask for any special rules.  they wont get relegated anyway.

noble has to learn to play by the rules.

I see the point. And I understand the point, however when twp had their central funding removed from them, and forced to continue to pay for opposing travel, then the "rules" became pick and choose.

[Bob8]

10 minutes ago, aj1908 said:

toronto should suck it up and not ask for any special rules.  they wont get relegated anyway.

noble has to learn to play by the rules.

Does that mean they should get the 1.8 million in funding too?

[aj1908]

4 minutes ago, TboneFromTO said:

I see the point. And I understand the point, however when twp had their central funding removed from them, and forced to continue to pay for opposing travel, then the "rules" became pick and choose.

Yeh but realistically the other super league clubs don't have to do anything for a rival 

Imo it's bad management by the club

If your talking about 100k for five juniors at.20k maybe they would 

Catalans don't get salary cap.exemptions 

And the quote.by bob Hunter earlier.says Toronto.gave up English tv rights.to.be able to sell.the.nh rights