Gomersall Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, Rovers13 said: But isn’t the game moving away from on field performance? Clubs will have made contactual agreements for the 2024 season based on which division they are expecting to be playing in. You would be disrupting several clubs planning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers13 Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 Just now, Gomersall said: Clubs will have made contactual agreements for the 2024 season based on which division they are expecting to be playing in. You would be disrupting several clubs planning. I totally agree with that but extreme circumstances like Newcastle etc folding so sometimes you have to make extreme measures. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnM Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Toby Chopra said: I'm literally on a train to Manchester. Should I get off? Phew .. that's a relief. Good job you're not actually on the train, only literally or metaphorically on it. ( but yes, I know what you mean) Edited October 13, 2023 by JohnM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RugbyLeagueGeek Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 16 minutes ago, NW10LDN said: Merge L1 and Champ so each club gets 21 matches. And then split into a 12 team Champ and 10 team L1 for 24-25. But what happens if we're in the same boat next season with other clubs dropping out (which unfortunately seems quite likely IMO)? My view is just have a full-time pro comp and a semi-pro comp, both with minimum standards and minimum guaranteed spend from the club. Then decide how many games they want to play. At the moment the game seems obsessed with everyone playing home and away for a nice tidy format. We just don't have the right numbers of clubs to make that work. The comps are all currently decided by a Grand Final anyway, so imbalance in the season isn't the end of the world. The NRL and NFL seem to make it work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers13 Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 But if we are trying to get say 20 plus more grade A clubs isn’t the logical answer to have the top 20 clubs who are closer to being an A grade in the top 2 divisions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomersall Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 1 minute ago, Rovers13 said: But if we are trying to get say 20 plus more grade A clubs isn’t the logical answer to have the top 20 clubs who are closer to being an A grade in the top 2 divisions? Under the current criteria you’d end up with grade C clubs in there IMO. Do we have 20 A or B grade clubs is what I’m getting at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RugbyLeagueGeek Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 As an aside, I wonder what the situation would be in a parallel universe where a Cardiff team was selected to join Super League in 1999 instead of Gateshead Thunder? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers13 Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, Gomersall said: Under the current criteria you’d end up with grade C clubs in there IMO. Do we have 20 A or B grade clubs is what I’m getting at? That’s a good point tbf, I personally think there will be a lot of B grade clubs, but until next week it’s all guess work tbh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Masked Poster Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, RugbyLeagueGeek said: As an aside, I wonder what the situation would be in a parallel universe where a Cardiff team was selected to join Super League in 1999 instead of Gateshead Thunder? A sliding doors moment. But I think they would not have lasted as long as Newcastle/Gateshead. A more pertinent question might be; what might have happened if Gateshead had been allowed a second season in SL? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomersall Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 (edited) 7 minutes ago, The Masked Poster said: A sliding doors moment. But I think they would not have lasted as long as Newcastle/Gateshead. A more pertinent question might be; what might have happened if Gateshead had been allowed a second season in SL? They pulled out (or merged) of their own volition. They weren’t not allowed a second season by the RFL. They should have been given their fair share of Sky money though. Edited October 13, 2023 by Gomersall 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivans82 Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 53 minutes ago, crashmon said: How many Professional clubs in SL would survive as Professional clubs with no Sky money. 5? 6? I would guess at the moment with players on full time wages. at the level they are earning now..................none ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 1 hour ago, crashmon said: 100% agree Then come crying when the only reason they exist in the form they do (Sky TV Money), tells them that they are reducing their spending money, as these people outside the M62 are not subscribing to watch the M62 only game, and the M62 located fans are not paying enough in their Sky subscriptions to ensure that Sky keeps funding at the levels they need. How many Professional clubs in SL would survive as Professional clubs with no Sky money. 5? 6? All of them. But they'd be part time. "We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Future is League Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 All the while the RFL want potential news clubs from outside the heartlands to put up a £100,000 bond and pay visiting teams expenses the game will continue to shrink, and looked what happened when a team from Manchester wanted to join league 1 hurdles were put in their way. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Masked Poster Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 6 minutes ago, Gomersall said: They pulled out (or merged) of their own volition. They weren’t not allowed a second season by the RFL. They should have been given their fair share of Sky money though. That's maybe the HR or lawyers version of events. But if you were there you will know they were essentially sacrificed to save Hull FC. That's the reality. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers13 Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 Just now, Griff said: All of them. But they'd be part time. Then we have to look and say can we fund a full time game? In an ideal world you would have 2 leagues of 10 all full time clubs one up one down, but we can’t for various reasons the main one being money. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheddingswasus Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 25 minutes ago, ChristianB said: Combining the remainder of League 1 and the Championship is surely now the only viable option (even if it means applying the levels of funding that would have existed otherwise for the year). No need for home and away, just all clubs play each other once in the 2024 season. Yes, there will be blow-out scores, but they will be survivable. This season there were 14 clubs making 27 fixtures. If each club played each other once there would be 22 fixtures. Add to that 6 derby matches for each club that would give 27 same as this year. Out of interest does anyone know the funding structure proposed for next year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivarr the Boneless Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 I was an Oxford fan and often watched them away. The horrible truth is the majority of teams I visited with ORL are either now defunct or playing regional rugby. The alarm bells have been ringing for a while. Conscious choices have been made about how the sport responded, we now see the consequences. I sincerely hope the decisions prove to be right in the long run as, in the short to medium term, the sport is paying a high price. Best wishes to the Thunder fans. They were a good bunch, I always enjoyed my trips to both Gateshead and Newcastle. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phiggins Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 15 hours ago, Gav Wilson said: I'm absolutely gutted to hear about this. Magic Weekends, RLWC games, the NE academy pathways. All that hard work for nothing. Rugby League is in a tough spot, League 1 is surely not sustainable now. I get the impression that these were all separate / siloed efforts, and not part of an overall plan, hence the wasted effort. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheddingswasus Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 29 minutes ago, Rovers13 said: I totally agree with that but extreme circumstances like Newcastle etc folding so sometimes you have to make extreme measures. Bear in mind several clubs sailed close to the wind financially last year, Whitehaven was one, rumours that Widns ran close etc. Toulouse still aren’t out of the woods yet, rumours that they could revert to French league if they lose Saturday. So this situation isn’t just about what to do with 8 clubs but the game as a whole. I know Wakefield are remaining full time but Featherstone are going part time with the owner reducing his input. If the drawbridge is drawn to SL then a few clubs may reduce their ambitions and outside funding 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barley Mow Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 45 minutes ago, Henson Park Old Firm said: Can't someone contact Melbourne Storm (name sake and colour scheme) and try to convince them invest as a uk feeder club? I know ut sounds half backed and dumb idea I was thinking something similar, but with Newcastle Knights. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RugbyLeagueGeek Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 1 minute ago, sheddingswasus said: If the drawbridge is drawn to SL then a few clubs may reduce their ambitions and outside funding The drawbridge isn't being drawn. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheddingswasus Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 Not in the long term but definitely in the short term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers13 Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, sheddingswasus said: Bear in mind several clubs sailed close to the wind financially last year, Whitehaven was one, rumours that Widns ran close etc. Toulouse still aren’t out of the woods yet, rumours that they could revert to French league if they lose Saturday. So this situation isn’t just about what to do with 8 clubs but the game as a whole. I know Wakefield are remaining full time but Featherstone are going part time with the owner reducing his input. If the drawbridge is drawn to SL then a few clubs may reduce their ambitions and outside funding I don’t think is going part time is a financial thing I could be wrong but club have said numerous times were self sustaining, I think it’s a closed shop thing where why spend 2m on a squad for nothing basically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubby Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, RugbyLeagueGeek said: The drawbridge isn't being drawn. No, but they're removed half of the planks and built a wall across it. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 I wonder if the RFL even care when clubs go to the wall, their response when Skolars withdrew was underwhelming at best. I’m not expecting them to bail clubs out but do they ever do anything to help? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now