havenhater Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 Few weeks for latu I heard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 There's a difference between administration and insolvency. Technically administration is a form of insolvency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seaton Sandy Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 Technically administration is a form of insolvency Technical moot points apart- those who go down the administration route commit themselves to a stringent regime of financial reparation --believe it or not --scrutinised by independent administrators who do their utmost to address the rights of all creditors ,regardless of the financial impact on those in administration. A completely different scenario to those who roll belly-up and scuttle away to emerge wearing a different mask leaving a trail of debts in their wake. I suspect you're out of your comfort zone on this debate assamarra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearintown Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 To be fair the main reason Town didnt wind up and start again, is the fact that we would have lost the lease on the ground. This was discussed at length at the public forums at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieTownie Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Technically administration is a form of insolvency Not really but many companies are insolvent at a given point in time without liquidation. Administration is different to liquidation which is different to insolvency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Technical moot points apart- those who go down the administration route commit themselves to a stringent regime of financial reparation --believe it or not --scrutinised by independent administrators who do their utmost to address the rights of all creditors ,regardless of the financial impact on those in administration. A completely different scenario to those who roll belly-up and scuttle away to emerge wearing a different mask leaving a trail of debts in their wake. I suspect you're out of your comfort zone on this debate assamarra. Your suspicions are incorrect. I am not out of my comfort zone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Not really but many companies are insolvent at a given point in time without liquidation. Administration is different to liquidation which is different to insolvency. Administration is different to liquidation but both are forms of insolvency as defined under the relative laws. Is this what you actually meant to say? Administration does involve the inability to meet debts as they are due I.e, insolvency You didn't mention liquidation in your original post hence my comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieTownie Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 No. Insolvency is different to administration which is different to bankruptcy is what I meant. Just because a company is insolvent it doesn't necessarily go into administration or become bankrupt. A company can be insolvent one day, but not the next, then insolvent again the day after. Hence there is a difference between insolvency and administration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun mc Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 There is a difference between insolvency and administration, though both are governed by insolvency law A company can have short term cash flows and not pay its creditors for a while, but it may not be insolvent. Administration is a procedure whereby the company is managed as to seeing whether it has a future or not. Can it be re-capitalised, can part of it be sold off to raise funds to pay creditors, are there any buyers for it?. The administrator acts as a Chief Exec with the view to managing the assets of the company and managing its obligations to creditors This is a whole lot different to a company declaring itself insolvent/bankrupt and then walking away from its obligations and re-surfacing with (at times) the same directors/managers that took the company down the insolvent route in the first place One poster here is trying to justify Whitehavens actions of a few years ago in walking away from its debts, and then making out that Town were the same, when in reality, the 2 courses of action were worlds apart financially and morally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieTownie Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Exactly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 No. Insolvency is different to administration which is different to bankruptcy is what I meant. Just because a company is insolvent it doesn't necessarily go into administration or become bankrupt. A company can be insolvent one day, but not the next, then insolvent again the day after. Hence there is a difference between insolvency and administration. Sorry but you are incorrect Administration, liquidation and bankruptcy are all forms of insolvency as defined in UK law BTW in the UK a company cannot become bankrupt only individuals can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
town4me Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Administration insolvency liquidation bankruptcy. This conversation isn't very inspiring is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donald Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Administration insolvency liquidation bankruptcy. This conversation isn't very inspiring is it. poor Jamie doran Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hate the rec Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Cant see the point in all this !!! we are both ######, both at the foot of the table and both looking at relegation and people are more interested in what has gone on years ago ! does it matter who went bust or not, if we both go down I cant see either club surviving, maybe people will be happy then !!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieTownie Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Sorry but you are incorrect Administration, liquidation and bankruptcy are all forms of insolvency as defined in UK law BTW in the UK a company cannot become bankrupt only individuals can I'm sorry but I'm not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
town4me Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Cant see the point in all this !!! we are both ######, both at the foot of the table and both looking at relegation and people are more interested in what has gone on years ago ! does it matter who went bust or not, if we both go down I cant see either club surviving, maybe people will be happy then !!!!!!yes the future is now very uncertain as the drop will mean a significant cut in money and players will move on and some will probably retire too. This will inevitably hit already poor crowds and so income will be down. Playing hemel hemstead and the all golds is not going to be good. It better to thing of rescue plans rather than Insolvency and administration etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieTownie Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Well if haven cone down too it'll make things easier as they won't have the money to take our better players. It'll be interesting to see how we do with a squad that's almost fully fit. Every team will get injuries but I think we've played Haven and Swinton at the worst possible time. Had we had a full squad and beaten those 2 teams things wouldn't look anywhere near as bad and we'll have 7 of the bottom 8 to play (who should be beatable looking at the Halifax performance) in the 8's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonymouse Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 its a tough one , halifax was 2 weeks ago so some momentum could be lost and with all the players that are now available then what do you change from a squad that almost turned fax over apart from the one or two players that were poor in defence . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unicorn106 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Just been told that Jamie Doran was told by the club that there was no way he could play for Bennies last weekend, obviously he has just stuck two fingers up at the club and took no notice, We should get rid end of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death to the Rah Rah's Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 He maybe was, but if this had been football it would have been splattered all over the press and confirmation the said player had been fined for their misdemeanor ! As there's no confirmation either way from the club, then once again its pure speculation on the part of the clubs long suffering supporters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havenite13 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 WORKINGTON TOWN J MURPHY HULME MOSSOP CARTER FORBER DORAN COWARD MATTINSON SHACKLEY B PHILLIPS STACK MCAVOY C PHILLIPS WHITELEY WALKER VERLINDEN GORDON C MURPHY GEE - See more at: http://www.rugby-league.com/match_preview/12136#sthash.AUDOZ71F.dpuf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearintown Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Just been told that Jamie Doran was told by the club that there was no way he could play for Bennies last weekend, obviously he has just stuck two fingers up at the club and took no notice, We should get rid end of story. Was told by a St Bens player this week that Doran was in the squad but did not play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Townie123 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Well if haven cone down too it'll make things easier as they won't have the money to take our better players. It'll be interesting to see how we do with a squad that's almost fully fit. Every team will get injuries but I think we've played Haven and Swinton at the worst possible time. Had we had a full squad and beaten those 2 teams things wouldn't look anywhere near as bad and we'll have 7 of the bottom 8 to play (who should be beatable looking at the Halifax performance) in the 8's. Who are these better players you speak of ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wonky Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 WORKINGTON TOWN J MURPHY HULME MOSSOP CARTER FORBER DORAN COWARD MATTINSON SHACKLEY B PHILLIPS STACK MCAVOY C PHILLIPS WHITELEY WALKER VERLINDEN GORDON C MURPHY GEE - See more at: http://www.rugby-league.com/match_preview/12136#sthash.AUDOZ71F.dpuf no jason but latu in. the futures bright,the futures blue and white Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieTownie Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Latu's a couple of weeks away...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.