Old Frightful 6,301 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 McIlorum : Grade B high tackle 1 match penalty notice Grade F Other contrary behaviour Joel Tomkins : Grade F Other contrary behaviour. Interesting, looks like neither will be available for their SF clash with Saints. Mickey Mac Grade F, was that picking Dwyer up and dumping him after he smacked him across the chops? 2 "It started out in innocence, the way that most things do, a thousand people crammed in one place, but the only face was you" Link to post Share on other sites
GUBRATS 5,073 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Just now, Old Frightful said: McIlorum : Grade B high tackle 1 match penalty notice Grade F Other contrary behaviour Joel Tomkins : Grade F Other contrary behaviour. Interesting, looks like neither will be available for their SF clash with Saints. Mickey Mac Grade F, was that picking Dwyer up and dumping him after he smacked him across the chops? Yep , ridiculous Link to post Share on other sites
Tommygilf 7,809 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 (edited) From t'other thread One game ban for McIlorum and 2 grade F charges for "other contrary behaviour" for him and Tomkins. That the video referee stepped in for neither is quite worrying, particularly the McIlorum incidents. The one game ban particularly questions the referees as it would arguably have not been in place should a card etc been shown and thus sufficient punishment dished out. Grade F charges carry a minimum 8 game suspension. To put it into perspective, the bans they face would have put them out of two-thirds of the games Catalans have actually played this season. That neither were rebuked on the night is rather shocking. Its unbelievable that an 8 game ban worthy incident (on top of a 1 game ban worthy incident) where there was a stoppage in play to review it by the ref, 2 Assistants and the video ref, and 3 prior penalties for high tackles recieved no punishment on the night. Its genuinely shocking and thankfully didn't have worse repercussions for Dwyer. Edited November 16, 2020 by Tommygilf 6 Link to post Share on other sites
7723 523 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous. 1 Patwigaw Link to post Share on other sites
Tommygilf 7,809 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, Old Frightful said: McIlorum : Grade B high tackle 1 match penalty notice Grade F Other contrary behaviour Joel Tomkins : Grade F Other contrary behaviour. Interesting, looks like neither will be available for their SF clash with Saints. Mickey Mac Grade F, was that picking Dwyer up and dumping him after he smacked him across the chops? The McIlorum grade f charge was for picking up Dwyer and dropping him after knowing he had hit him high. In his small brain he was trying to stop Dwyer playing for a penalty. It could have been an Adam Obrien scenario and such actions would have been much worse. In any case, touching an injured player (that you have injured!) is beyond the pale. 5 Link to post Share on other sites
Tommygilf 7,809 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 1 minute ago, 7723 said: Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous. See Mose Masoe or Adam O'brien. That is why you don't touch an injured player especially with a head knock. 9 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Old Frightful 6,301 Posted November 16, 2020 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, Tommygilf said: From t'other thread Sorry, have I duplicated someone else's post? "It started out in innocence, the way that most things do, a thousand people crammed in one place, but the only face was you" Link to post Share on other sites
Tommygilf 7,809 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Just now, Old Frightful said: Sorry, have I duplicated someone else's post? No there was just a thread on Contact With the Head. Link to post Share on other sites
sweaty craiq 1,183 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Acton got 12/13 after picking Bird up at Cats - and he wasn't even hurt!! 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Wollo Wollo Wayoo 938 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 4 minutes ago, 7723 said: Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous. So you didn't actually see the incident then? This world was never meant for one as beautiful as me. Wakefield Trinity RLFC 2012 - 2014 "The wasted years" 2013, 2014 & 2015 Official Magic Weekend "Whipping Boys" 2017 - The year the dream disappeared under Grix's left foot. 2018 - The FinniChezz Bromance 2019 - The Return of the Prodigal Son Link to post Share on other sites
GUBRATS 5,073 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 1 minute ago, sweaty craiq said: Acton got 12/13 after picking Bird up at Cats - and he wasn't even hurt!! I thought it was 9 Link to post Share on other sites
Tommygilf 7,809 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 1 minute ago, sweaty craiq said: Acton got 12/13 after picking Bird up at Cats - and he wasn't even hurt!! Its a minimum of 8 games Link to post Share on other sites
Old Frightful 6,301 Posted November 16, 2020 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 7 minutes ago, 7723 said: Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous. Did you see the incident? "It started out in innocence, the way that most things do, a thousand people crammed in one place, but the only face was you" Link to post Share on other sites
DavidM 10,523 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 The video ref should get a Grade F for missing it . Absolutely inexplicable 7 Link to post Share on other sites
LeeF 2,180 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 6 minutes ago, DavidM said: The video ref should get a Grade F for missing it . Absolutely inexplicable When Thaler “missed” the Greenwood high tackle (yellow should have been red) he didn’t get an appointment the week after. I would expect Hicks to not be appointed as a VR this week as a minimum 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Mattrhino 1,363 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 36 minutes ago, 7723 said: Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous. Picking him up with a head injury is incredibly dangerous. He knew exactly what he was doing. Fortunately the officials that night were beyond incompetent. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Mattrhino 1,363 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Hopefully all the officials for that game should be done for the season. Link to post Share on other sites
Mattrhino 1,363 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 31 minutes ago, DavidM said: The video ref should get a Grade F for missing it . Absolutely inexplicable Yep he should be dropped from SL for a while in my opinion. Unfortunately we don't have loads of refs to choose from so might not be possible. Link to post Share on other sites
Hela Wigmen 2,841 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Tomkins’ ban shouldn’t be measured by matches. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Rupert Prince 1,687 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 18 minutes ago, Mattrhino said: Yep he should be dropped from SL for a while in my opinion. Unfortunately we don't have loads of refs to choose from so might not be possible. Witch hunters in full cry. Without referees we have no game. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
DavidM 10,523 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 5 minutes ago, Rupert Prince said: Witch hunters in full cry. Without referees we have no game. You’ve still got to be held to account . Same down under .And we’re in the play offs so there’s enough refs to pick from for those . No way Hicks should figure again this season imo . Protocols , player welfare , discipline everything just went ignored by him Link to post Share on other sites
Dave T 18,547 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 30 minutes ago, Hela Wigmen said: Tomkins’ ban shouldn’t be measured by matches. I tend to agree. We are seeing some particularly unsavoury incidents at the moment that are pretty much sexual assault, and we should be coming down on it very, very hard. But then we do things like make excuses for Makinson and reduce bans and we condone it. 4 Link to post Share on other sites
marklaspalmas 1,800 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Thugs will be thugs. These two just can't help themselves https://www.fevarchive.co.uk/ Link to post Share on other sites
LeeF 2,180 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 1 hour ago, DavidM said: You’ve still got to be held to account . Same down under .And we’re in the play offs so there’s enough refs to pick from for those . No way Hicks should figure again this season imo . Protocols , player welfare , discipline everything just went ignored by him Match Officials are held to account every single week Link to post Share on other sites
LeeF 2,180 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Mattrhino said: Yep he should be dropped from SL for a while in my opinion. Unfortunately we don't have loads of refs to choose from so might not be possible. And in that statement you show so much ignorance Match Officials are accountable every single week and appointments or non appointments reflect this and have done for years 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now