Jump to content

Micky McIlorum and Joel Tomkins at the RFL Disciplinary.


Recommended Posts

McIlorum :

Grade B high tackle 1 match penalty notice

Grade F Other contrary behaviour

Joel Tomkins :

Grade F Other contrary behaviour.

Interesting, looks like neither will be available for their SF clash with Saints. Mickey Mac Grade F, was that picking Dwyer up and dumping him after he smacked him across the chops?

  • Like 2

                                    "It started out in innocence, the way that most things do,
                                     a thousand people crammed in one place, but the only face was you"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

See Mose Masoe or Adam O'brien. That is why you don't touch an injured player especially with a head knock.

This was my favourite part.

Shows you how lucky Makinson was to only get 5 matches for his testicle juggling.

Just now, Old Frightful said:

McIlorum :

Grade B high tackle 1 match penalty notice

Grade F Other contrary behaviour

Joel Tomkins :

Grade F Other contrary behaviour.

Interesting, looks like neither will be available for their SF clash with Saints. Mickey Mac Grade F, was that picking Dwyer up and dumping him after he smacked him across the chops?

Yep , ridiculous 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From t'other thread

One game ban for McIlorum and 2 grade F charges for "other contrary behaviour" for him and Tomkins. That the video referee stepped in for neither is quite worrying, particularly the McIlorum incidents. The one game ban particularly questions the referees as it would arguably have not been in place should a card etc been shown and thus sufficient punishment dished out. Grade F charges carry a minimum 8 game suspension.

To put it into perspective, the bans they face would have put them out of two-thirds of the games Catalans have actually played this season. That neither were rebuked on the night is rather shocking.

Its unbelievable that an 8 game ban worthy incident (on top of a 1 game ban worthy incident) where there was a stoppage in play to review it by the ref, 2 Assistants and the video ref, and 3 prior penalties for high tackles recieved no punishment on the night. 

Its genuinely shocking and thankfully didn't have worse repercussions for Dwyer. 

Edited by Tommygilf
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Old Frightful said:

McIlorum :

Grade B high tackle 1 match penalty notice

Grade F Other contrary behaviour

Joel Tomkins :

Grade F Other contrary behaviour.

Interesting, looks like neither will be available for their SF clash with Saints. Mickey Mac Grade F, was that picking Dwyer up and dumping him after he smacked him across the chops?

The McIlorum grade f charge was for picking up Dwyer and dropping him after knowing he had hit him high. In his small brain he was trying to stop Dwyer playing for a penalty. It could have been an Adam Obrien scenario and such actions would have been much worse.

In any case, touching an injured player (that you have injured!) is beyond the pale.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

From t'other thread

Sorry, have I duplicated someone else's post?

                                    "It started out in innocence, the way that most things do,
                                     a thousand people crammed in one place, but the only face was you"

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 7723 said:

 Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous.

So you didn't actually see the incident then?

This world was never meant for one as beautiful as me.
 
 
Wakefield Trinity RLFC
2012 - 2014 "The wasted years"

2013, 2014 & 2015 Official Magic Weekend "Whipping Boys"

2017 - The year the dream disappeared under Grix's left foot.

2018 - The FinniChezz Bromance 

2019 - The Return of the Prodigal Son

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, 7723 said:

 Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous.

Did you see the incident?

                                    "It started out in innocence, the way that most things do,
                                     a thousand people crammed in one place, but the only face was you"

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, DavidM said:

The video ref should get a Grade F for missing it . Absolutely inexplicable 

When Thaler “missed” the Greenwood high tackle (yellow should have been red) he didn’t get an appointment the week after. I would expect Hicks to not be appointed as a VR this week as a minimum

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Mattrhino said:

Yep he should be dropped from SL for a while in my opinion. Unfortunately we don't have loads of refs to choose from so might not be possible. 

Witch hunters in full cry.  Without referees we have no game. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Rupert Prince said:

Witch hunters in full cry.  Without referees we have no game. 

You’ve still got to be held to account . Same down under .And we’re in the play offs so there’s enough refs to pick from for those . No way Hicks should figure again this season imo . Protocols , player welfare , discipline everything just went ignored by him 

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Hela Wigmen said:

Tomkins’ ban shouldn’t be measured by matches. 

 

I tend to agree. We are seeing some particularly unsavoury incidents at the moment that are pretty much sexual assault, and we should be coming down on it very, very hard. 

But then we do things like make excuses for Makinson and reduce bans and we condone it. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DavidM said:

You’ve still got to be held to account . Same down under .And we’re in the play offs so there’s enough refs to pick from for those . No way Hicks should figure again this season imo . Protocols , player welfare , discipline everything just went ignored by him 

Match Officials are held to account every single week 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mattrhino said:

Yep he should be dropped from SL for a while in my opinion. Unfortunately we don't have loads of refs to choose from so might not be possible. 

And in that statement you show so much ignorance 

Match Officials are accountable every single week and appointments or non appointments reflect this and have done for years

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...