Jump to content

Micky McIlorum and Joel Tomkins at the RFL Disciplinary.

Old Frightful

Recommended Posts

Old Frightful

Old Frightful

Posted
Posted

McIlorum :

Grade B high tackle 1 match penalty notice

Grade F Other contrary behaviour

Joel Tomkins :

Grade F Other contrary behaviour.

Interesting, looks like neither will be available for their SF clash with Saints. Mickey Mac Grade F, was that picking Dwyer up and dumping him after he smacked him across the chops?

                                         "You've only won one trophy SINCE 1985"
                                             

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply
GUBRATS

GUBRATS

Posted
Posted
Just now, Old Frightful said:

McIlorum :

Grade B high tackle 1 match penalty notice

Grade F Other contrary behaviour

Joel Tomkins :

Grade F Other contrary behaviour.

Interesting, looks like neither will be available for their SF clash with Saints. Mickey Mac Grade F, was that picking Dwyer up and dumping him after he smacked him across the chops?

Yep , ridiculous 

Tommygilf

Tommygilf

Posted
Posted

From t'other thread

One game ban for McIlorum and 2 grade F charges for "other contrary behaviour" for him and Tomkins. That the video referee stepped in for neither is quite worrying, particularly the McIlorum incidents. The one game ban particularly questions the referees as it would arguably have not been in place should a card etc been shown and thus sufficient punishment dished out. Grade F charges carry a minimum 8 game suspension.

To put it into perspective, the bans they face would have put them out of two-thirds of the games Catalans have actually played this season. That neither were rebuked on the night is rather shocking.

Its unbelievable that an 8 game ban worthy incident (on top of a 1 game ban worthy incident) where there was a stoppage in play to review it by the ref, 2 Assistants and the video ref, and 3 prior penalties for high tackles recieved no punishment on the night. 

Its genuinely shocking and thankfully didn't have worse repercussions for Dwyer. 

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

 Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous.

Tommygilf

Tommygilf

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Old Frightful said:

McIlorum :

Grade B high tackle 1 match penalty notice

Grade F Other contrary behaviour

Joel Tomkins :

Grade F Other contrary behaviour.

Interesting, looks like neither will be available for their SF clash with Saints. Mickey Mac Grade F, was that picking Dwyer up and dumping him after he smacked him across the chops?

The McIlorum grade f charge was for picking up Dwyer and dropping him after knowing he had hit him high. In his small brain he was trying to stop Dwyer playing for a penalty. It could have been an Adam Obrien scenario and such actions would have been much worse.

In any case, touching an injured player (that you have injured!) is beyond the pale.

Tommygilf

Tommygilf

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, 7723 said:

 Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous.

See Mose Masoe or Adam O'brien. That is why you don't touch an injured player especially with a head knock.

Old Frightful

Old Frightful

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

From t'other thread

Sorry, have I duplicated someone else's post?

                                         "You've only won one trophy SINCE 1985"
                                             
Tommygilf

Tommygilf

Posted
Posted
Just now, Old Frightful said:

Sorry, have I duplicated someone else's post?

No there was just a thread on Contact With the Head.

Wollo Wollo Wayoo

Wollo Wollo Wayoo

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, 7723 said:

 Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous.

So you didn't actually see the incident then?

This world was never meant for one as beautiful as me.
 
 
Wakefield Trinity RLFC
2012 - 2014 "The wasted years"

2013, 2014 & 2015 Official Magic Weekend "Whipping Boys"

2017 - The year the dream disappeared under Grix's left foot.

2018 - The FinniChezz Bromance 

2019 - The Return of the Prodigal Son

 

 

GUBRATS

GUBRATS

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, sweaty craiq said:

Acton got 12/13 after picking Bird up at Cats - and he wasn't even hurt!!

I thought it was 9 

Tommygilf

Tommygilf

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, sweaty craiq said:

Acton got 12/13 after picking Bird up at Cats - and he wasn't even hurt!!

Its a minimum of 8 games

Old Frightful

Old Frightful

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, 7723 said:

 Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous.

Did you see the incident?

                                         "You've only won one trophy SINCE 1985"
                                             
LeeF

LeeF

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, DavidM said:

The video ref should get a Grade F for missing it . Absolutely inexplicable 

When Thaler “missed” the Greenwood high tackle (yellow should have been red) he didn’t get an appointment the week after. I would expect Hicks to not be appointed as a VR this week as a minimum

Mattrhino

Mattrhino

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, 7723 said:

 Grade F for picking someone up? Seriously? That’s ridiculous.

Picking him up with a head injury is incredibly dangerous. He knew exactly what he was doing. Fortunately the officials that night were beyond incompetent.

Mattrhino

Mattrhino

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, DavidM said:

The video ref should get a Grade F for missing it . Absolutely inexplicable 

Yep he should be dropped from SL for a while in my opinion. Unfortunately we don't have loads of refs to choose from so might not be possible. 

Rupert Prince

Rupert Prince

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Mattrhino said:

Yep he should be dropped from SL for a while in my opinion. Unfortunately we don't have loads of refs to choose from so might not be possible. 

Witch hunters in full cry.  Without referees we have no game. 

DavidM

DavidM

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Rupert Prince said:

Witch hunters in full cry.  Without referees we have no game. 

You’ve still got to be held to account . Same down under .And we’re in the play offs so there’s enough refs to pick from for those . No way Hicks should figure again this season imo . Protocols , player welfare , discipline everything just went ignored by him 

Dave T

Dave T

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Hela Wigmen said:

Tomkins’ ban shouldn’t be measured by matches. 

 

I tend to agree. We are seeing some particularly unsavoury incidents at the moment that are pretty much sexual assault, and we should be coming down on it very, very hard. 

But then we do things like make excuses for Makinson and reduce bans and we condone it. 

LeeF

LeeF

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, DavidM said:

You’ve still got to be held to account . Same down under .And we’re in the play offs so there’s enough refs to pick from for those . No way Hicks should figure again this season imo . Protocols , player welfare , discipline everything just went ignored by him 

Match Officials are held to account every single week 

LeeF

LeeF

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mattrhino said:

Yep he should be dropped from SL for a while in my opinion. Unfortunately we don't have loads of refs to choose from so might not be possible. 

And in that statement you show so much ignorance 

Match Officials are accountable every single week and appointments or non appointments reflect this and have done for years

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.