Does the disciplinary treat men and women differently?

[RigbyLuger]

 

[Jughead]

Ah, the old “[insert player name] gets more/less games than [insert player name]” whilst completely ignoring the variables line. 

[RigbyLuger]

2 minutes ago, Jughead said:

Ah, the old “[insert player name] gets more/less games than [insert player name]” whilst completely ignoring the variables line. 

It does appear that way!

[Oxford]

Does the disciplinary treat men and women differently?

Yes they can't use the same toilets while they're waiting for their hearing.

[Dunbar]

The RFL disciplinary will treat different incidents differently. 

As for the Tweet itself.  Not the wisest decision to post that nonsense. 

[The Blues Ox]

I can’t believe she even got a ban for that never mind more than 3 games.

[DavidM]

She got the mandatory  ‘absolute joke’ in anyway .

[Damien]

The women quickly learning from the men when it comes to moaning on social media.

[Impartial Observer]

Maybe she has previous incidents on her record. Someone should tell her that it is an independent panel makes the decisions and not the rfl.

[Spidey]

I don't think its a Male/Female thing

Look at bans given out to Professional (SL) v Amateur (NCL) with the amateur players copping for a lot more for very similar charges

The women's game is still "amateur" and may suffer in the same way

[sentoffagain2]

   Women play a lot less games so in proportion a shorter ban seems fair.A long ban would take up half the season.

[gingerjon]

3 hours ago, sentoffagain2 said:

   Women play a lot less games so in proportion a shorter ban seems fair.A long ban would take up half the season.

This would seem to be the bigger issue.

[Chris22]

Perhaps a better way to avoid being banned is not to punch opposing players in the head?

[Oxford]

Admittedly it's a clever way to try and have your ban reduced or cleared.

The point about the percentage of the season is well made too.

Using this a sexism case or issue though is to demean and tarnish real ones though.

Most bias cases come about because there was thought to be no probelm until a problem occurs and is made visible. Most institutions are too stupid to address the problem and too inept to be able to do it.

I don't think for a moment that this is a real case of bias as the RFL whatever their critics say have never been so stupid as to commit this kind of thing overtly.