Jump to content

The General 'Toronto Wolfpack' Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, TIWIT said:

And your answer to my last question is...

I'm not sure why you keep asking that question, as though it's a zinger. It's a basic question with a basic answer. The answer is that if TWP cannot get a suitable owner in to run the club, then they won't get paid, and TWP will go belly up like many other businesses. 

But it is silly to make this whole decision based on the fact that some players would be paid. The proposal needs to be right, otherwise we just end up in this same situation in 12m time - something that we have seen in RL and many other sports in the past. 

People getting paid doesn't trump everything else, otherwise there would be no discussion, a new owner would simply offer to pay the players and then they would get the thumbs up, which is miles away from the level of due diligence we need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 10.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
10 hours ago, TIWIT said:

But I'm stuck in a hospital bed so what else can I do for fun but argue?

Yeah when was in that same position I argued with the entire world or in other words hope you're better soon.

 

1 hour ago, Dave T said:

I'm not sure why you keep asking that question, as though it's a zinger. It's a basic question with a basic answer. The answer is that if TWP cannot get a suitable owner in to run the club, then they won't get paid, and TWP will go belly up like many other businesses. 

But it is silly to make this whole decision based on the fact that some players would be paid. The proposal needs to be right, otherwise we just end up in this same situation in 12m time - something that we have seen in RL and many other sports in the past. 

People getting paid doesn't trump everything else, otherwise there would be no discussion, a new owner would simply offer to pay the players and then they would get the thumbs up, which is miles away from the level of due diligence we need.

I'm not sure anyone, especially SL and its clubs were going to consider the players wages as primary concern. However, the negativity from SL ( which could easily match it with stuff on here!) due dilligence may be the last consideration in their rejection.

2 warning points:kolobok_dirol:  Non-Political

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Robin Evans said:

I've been in bed since Sunday with a 39°c temp, a raging uti, peeing marmite  a cough and I've done a covid swab today. 

I took the test on Monday, and came back positive Tuesday, I will go along with your symptoms and add in a throat that feels as though if has been scrubbed with a wire brush.

Good luck Robin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Harry Stottle said:

I took the test on Monday, and came back positive Tuesday, I will go along with your symptoms and add in a throat that feels as though if has been scrubbed with a wire brush.

Good luck Robin.

Well I don't have Covid - sometimes I wish I did - but I hope you both recover soon with few consequences.  👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Harry Stottle said:

Get well soon TIWIT, I mean that most sincerely.

Thanks. I've been here so long now I'm even starting to like the food.   😝

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Oxford said:

 

I'm not sure anyone, especially SL and its clubs were going to consider the players wages as primary concern. However, the negativity from SL ( which could easily match it with stuff on here!) due dilligence may be the last consideration in their rejection.

To be fair, their application didn't meet the requirements by the deadline, they could easily have had their application rejected at that point. The fact that the request by the new guy for more time was agreed is a positive. 

It doesn't support the commentary that everything is negative. If it was so negative, they'd have been rejected by now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dave T said:

To be fair, their application didn't meet the requirements by the deadline, they could easily have had their application rejected at that point. The fact that the request by the new guy for more time was agreed is a positive. 

It doesn't support the commentary that everything is negative. If it was so negative, they'd have been rejected by now. 

Its actually going quite well and is positive in nature....its all going to work out....a top class fella is on top of things (Hunter) and the prospective new owner is a behind the scenes type of guy who wants the on field team to be the focus.

Things are looking up!  We are rounding the curve.

Run With The Pack!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kayakman said:

Its actually going quite well and is positive in nature....its all going to work out....a top class fella is on top of things (Hunter) and the prospective new owner is a behind the scenes type of guy who wants the on field team to be the focus.

Things are looking up!  We are rounding the curve.

Run With The Pack!

I was worried that it was going to be a no at that first step, so the fact they allowed the extension has to be a positive and suggests they are open to a re-admission here. 

I hope you are right about Hunter being more involved, as he absolutely gives me more confidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dave T said:

To be fair, their application didn't meet the requirements by the deadline, they could easily have had their application rejected at that point. The fact that the request by the new guy for more time was agreed is a positive. 

It doesn't support the commentary that everything is negative. If it was so negative, they'd have been rejected by now. 

That was a bit of evidence that they were willling to listen, certainly. But the stories eminating from almost every RL media outlet confirmed a general outlook that appeared to have already both made the decision and for a majority of clubs not being in favour.

The thing that confirms my pessimism though is TWP asking for a slice of the cake and chairmen/women never like having less of central funding.

They're a bit like when you visit a family at lunchtime  and everyone holds their hands and arms around their plates in case their sibling nicks a sausage or chip.

 

2 warning points:kolobok_dirol:  Non-Political

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dave T said:

I was worried that it was going to be a no at that first step, so the fact they allowed the extension has to be a positive and suggests they are open to a re-admission here. 

I hope you are right about Hunter being more involved, as he absolutely gives me more confidence.

If the truth be known Hunter should be put in charge of the SL and get rid of this Elstone guy....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dave T said:

I was worried that it was going to be a no at that first step, so the fact they allowed the extension has to be a positive and suggests they are open to a re-admission here. 

I hope you are right about Hunter being more involved, as he absolutely gives me more confidence.

I really don't get this Hunter adulation. It was after he joined that things really started to go pear shaped and he was the CEO during the period of non payment of wages and when they were being elusive in putting forward their 'application' for SL before last season's MPG; and continues to be afaik. Continuing in that role for months while such was going on suggests he was complicit in the act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said:

I really don't get this Hunter adulation. It was after he joined that things really started to go pear shaped and he was the CEO during the period of non payment of wages and when they were being elusive in putting forward their 'application' for SL before last season's MPG; and continues to be afaik. Continuing in that role for months while such was going on suggests he was complicit in the act.

The guy can't give money he doesn't have. The guy has actual major league management experience, it would probably be way worse without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheReaper said:

The guy can't give money he doesn't have. The guy has actual major league management experience, it would probably be way worse without him.

21 years at MAPLE LEAF and before that CEO ROGERS CENTRE thats been 2 serious positions why on earth he is hanging on at the TW only he knows.

 

Paul

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said:

I really don't get this Hunter adulation. It was after he joined that things really started to go pear shaped and he was the CEO during the period of non payment of wages and when they were being elusive in putting forward their 'application' for SL before last season's MPG; and continues to be afaik. Continuing in that role for months while such was going on suggests he was complicit in the act.

It's a good point, and much of my opinion is based on what he says to the media, he gives the impression to me that he knows what they need to do but Argyle was still far too hands on and running the show in reality. 

He has a good CV, he speaks sense, and tbh I thought it was clear he has been frustrated by Argyle for quite a while, it's like he knew he was trying to manage a spoilt man child. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Dave T said:

It's a good point, and much of my opinion is based on what he says to the media, he gives the impression to me that he knows what they need to do but Argyle was still far too hands on and running the show in reality. 

He has a good CV, he speaks sense, and tbh I thought it was clear he has been frustrated by Argyle for quite a while, it's like he knew he was trying to manage a spoilt man child. 

Yet he was prepared to carry on as they dug the hole they were in deeper and deeper, leading the business and effectively holding the spade. I'm afraid simply making the (sort of) right noises for someone in his position just doesn't cut it for me and if he's as savvy as made out he'd know he was banging his head against a wall with Argyle - as they say 'actions speak....'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said:

Yet he was prepared to carry on as they dug the hole they were in deeper and deeper, leading the business and effectively holding the spade. I'm afraid simply making the (sort of) right noises for someone in his position just doesn't cut it for me and if he's as savvy as made out he'd know he was banging his head against a wall with Argyle - as they say 'actions speak....'

Unless he could see Argyle was on the way out, and he was hanging around so that he was in pole position to advise the new owners (and of course hope they listen). As others have said his resume is excellent, he was trained by one of Canada’s richest and most successful businessmen and I think he’s a much better person for the RFL to deal with than the all controlling man child that Argyle turned out to be. I know nothing about the new guy, but surely he must actually realize that Argyles style is not the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Harry Stottle said:

I took the test on Monday, and came back positive Tuesday, I will go along with your symptoms and add in a throat that feels as though if has been scrubbed with a wire brush.

Good luck Robin.

So sorry to hear that Harry, hope you have a speedy recovery and no lasting side effects, like I said for Robin and TWIT, this forum needs you guys healthy and able to contribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Kayakman said:

Its actually going quite well and is positive in nature....its all going to work out....a top class fella is on top of things (Hunter) and the prospective new owner is a behind the scenes type of guy who wants the on field team to be the focus.

Things are looking up!  We are rounding the curve.

Run With The Pack!

I just hope we're the Pack and not a fox being chased by ravenous SL hounds. 😭

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/10/2020 at 04:07, Quolls2020 said:

The Wolfpack submitted a new business plan last month, with the Super League board responding by asking for more information from the franchise.

“There was nothing in there that we were surprised about,” Hunter said Wednesday. “And nothing that we had any challenges or difficulties preparing.”

“We are getting down to the short strokes,” he added.

The Wolfpack’s fate will eventually be decided by the 11 other Super League clubs, executive chairman Robert Elstone and the Rugby Football League. All have one vote.
 

from the star

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.