Jump to content

Strong rumours NRL #18 team will be PNG


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Damien said:

You could ask the same question of any club.

NRL clubs do get pretty generous funding well above the salary cap and if any PNG club can get the big multinationals involved, as mentioned previously, then I'm sure they will be fine. Add to that an increased PNG TV deal and PNG Government support and their funding and what they bring to the NRL could be as diverse as any other.

A lot of NRL clubs have different income streams ranging from league clubs to hotels and shopping centres etc as well as big sponsorship deals on top of ticket and merchandise sales.

not sure a PNG NRL franchise could come anywhere near matching these revenue streams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, unapologetic pedant said:

 

If the government are told to stop pushing by the electorate, they will either stop pushing or stop being the government.

Risking a detour into the political here - But if the Labor Party and the Liberals–Nationals both think it's a good idea to fund PNG NRL as a 'soft power' exercise, then the electorate would not stop it.

It seems unlikely to be in the top 15 issues for the average voter and if both major parties are proposing it, most of the electorate are still likely to vote for one of those two parties. They would be basing their decision on different issues where the two disagree - even if they think the Commonwealth Government shouldn't fund RL in PNG..

Edited by Barley Mow
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Martyn Sadler said:

At the very least, the NRL should want to be assured that this is a bi-partisan policy by the Federal government and it would want a clearly agreed timescale agreed by all parties that could conceivably form a Federal government.

Shades of the "Solomon binding" agreements on UK prices and incomes in the 1970s. A strategy that led to 25% inflation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Barley Mow said:

Risking a detour into the political here - But if the Labor Party and the Liberals–Nationals both think it's a good idea to fund PNG NRL as a 'soft power' exercise, then the electorate would not stop it.

It seems unlikely to be in the top 15 issues for the average voter and if both major parties are proposing it, most of the electorate are still likely to vote for one of those two parties. They would be basing their decision on different issues where the two disagree - even if they think the Commonwealth Government shouldn't fund RL in PNG..

The two main parties might remain the two main parties. But the individuals therein are here today gone tomorrow. The NRL/AFL code war element shouldn't be underestimated.

I'd like to hear a business case that a PNG NRL franchise would be a major driver for the growth of their economy. That's always the best argument for overseas aid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, unapologetic pedant said:

The two main parties might remain the two main parties. But the individuals therein are here today gone tomorrow. The NRL/AFL code war element shouldn't be underestimated.

I'd like to hear a business case that a PNG NRL franchise would be a major driver for the growth of their economy. That's always the best argument for overseas aid.

I wouldn't have expected it to be at the front of many people's minds when they cast their vote - there are many economic, societal, cultural and international issues I'd expect to be priorities.

But you are more likely to have a handle on Australian politics than me. I'll take your word for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bamboozle said:

 

I’m in no position to ask the Australian government and you obviously see a threat from China or you wouldn’t have stated otherwise.

Not one for this forum. Happy to debate over on the other forum though. However, the threat is in the Australian National Security Strategy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How to manage the effects on the Digicel Cup should be a central consideration for both governments. 

Many RL people in SEQ and Auckland say their local comps had the life sucked out of them by the creation of the Broncos and Warriors respectively. The financial repercussions for a comp in a third world nation would likely be more severe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think @jim_57 is an Aussie. He seems to think on page 1 that the NRL are rushing to get this over the line while Albo is still around. Which doesn't convey a sense of all-party consensus or longevity of commitment.

Albo will have the full support of his party right up to the moment he ceases to have the full support of his party. Bi-partisan plans will be bi-partisan plans right up to the moment they cease to be bi-partisan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AB90 said:

They may play the most but ‘watching’ rugby league is still a challenge for the majority of locals as it’s estimated only 9% of households in PNG have a TV with circa 1% of the population having fixed broadband/internet. 

A significant (and rapidly growing) proportion of the population has access to a smartphone - same as in every other developing country.  A PNG NRL team would be huge for Digicel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bamboozle said:

Of course the elephant in the room being that PNG is a poor 3rd world country with a large part of its population living below the poverty line.

and then of course there’s the high crime rates.

I suspect that IF they are the 18th club they will be based in North Queensland and will fly in the day of the match and comeback the same day and will the teams playing them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bamboozle said:

Why are the NRL allowing themselves to be used as political pawns?

the NRL if they had any sense whatsoever should be trying to woo the Chinese into investing into the competition.

The NRL probably smells money and opportunity.

The Canberra Raiders got millions from China via Huawei. After a few years they realised their PR campaign wasn’t working and the money stopped. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Henson Park Old Firm said:

I smell a Toronto Wolfpack club

Hope so, to see such large enthusiastic crowds at a new domestic club in a new country would be fantastic for the sport!

Edited by Hello
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Bamboozle said:

What threat does china pose to Australia?

We have to press the correct button to answer your questions, right?

Red button: None at all

Yellow button: Nothing to worry about

Green button: A little bit of a nuisance

Blue button: The most significant threat to Aussie national security.

I'm pressing blue.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, unapologetic pedant said:

How to manage the effects on the Digicel Cup should be a central consideration for both governments. 

Many RL people in SEQ and Auckland say their local comps had the life sucked out of them by the creation of the Broncos and Warriors respectively. The financial repercussions for a comp in a third world nation would likely be more severe.

Tasmania are getting a AFL team so why not PNG for NRL.

Edited by EggFace
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JonM said:

A significant (and rapidly growing) proportion of the population has access to a smartphone - same as in every other developing country.  A PNG NRL team would be huge for Digicel.

For some perspective on Sponsorship: 

  • Digicel are the platinum sponsors of the Kumuls and Orchids, they currently pay $1 Million AUD/year for that privilege
  • Digicel and ExonnMobil became naming rights co-sponsors of the domestic competition, this deal is also worth $1 Million AUD/year 
  • Santos is the naming rights sponsor of the national stadium in Port Moresby - this deal is worth 375k AUD.
  • Port Moresby Vipers had 15 Companies sponsoring their side in 2023 with their platinum sponsor NCD contributing 700k AUD (length of sponsorship unknown)
  • Mendi Muruks platinum sponsor PRK renewed their sponsorship this season for 800k AUD (length unknown), local government also pledged 250k AUD to the side. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I greatly doubt the NRL have had much choice in the matter , this is a geopolitical soft power move , Aussie government will foot the bill regardless. Australia is coming yo the end of its mineral fuelled land of milk and honey bubble , post Solomon Islands aligning with china it wants a friendly shield and associated air fields and deep water ports on its doorstep , An NRL team is a small price to pay .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.