Henson Park Old Firm Posted January 11 Posted January 11 https://x.com/M_Shaw1/status/1877648298745512099?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet
DI Keith Fowler Posted January 11 Posted January 11 28 minutes ago, Henson Park Old Firm said: https://x.com/M_Shaw1/status/1877648298745512099?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet Quote Rugby League Live can reveal that over half of the clubs currently in Super League have now formally contacted Salford and the RFL and placed offers for the players they are interested in signing should Salford need to cash in. The telling line. Just clubs trying to ramp up the pressure to get some transfers done, no actual developments in the story. I was born to run a club like this. Number 1, I do not spook easily, and those who think I do, are wasting their time, with their surprise attacks.
Segovia Carpet Posted January 11 Posted January 11 The Rugby League family eh? The greed and honesty of the ppl behind these Vulture clubs shows their true position. 1 2 1
JohnM Posted January 11 Posted January 11 16 minutes ago, Segovia Carpet said: The Rugby League family eh? The greed and honesty of the ppl behind these Vulture clubs shows their true position. Yes, how dare they act to reassure players that should their club fold, they will still have jobs in the game. 4 1 The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and achievements,
Dave T Posted January 11 Posted January 11 24 minutes ago, Segovia Carpet said: The Rugby League family eh? The greed and honesty of the ppl behind these Vulture clubs shows their true position. Nah. Can't keep playing the victim. 9 1 1
phiggins Posted January 11 Posted January 11 1 hour ago, DI Keith Fowler said: The telling line. Just clubs trying to ramp up the pressure to get some transfers done, no actual developments in the story. The longer the story goes without developments, the more likely it is that developments will be bad news for Salford when they do happen
Morris Wanchuk Posted January 11 Posted January 11 1 hour ago, Segovia Carpet said: The Rugby League family eh? The greed and honesty of the ppl behind these Vulture clubs shows their true position. Haha when Trinity were skint who do you think bought Tim Smith when the good Dr was splashing the cash? 4 1
LeytherRob Posted January 11 Author Posted January 11 1 hour ago, Morris Wanchuk said: Haha when Trinity were skint who do you think bought Tim Smith when the good Dr was splashing the cash? Not to mention snapping up Watkins and Ackers from Toronto. Salford have consistently shown little mercy when other clubs have been in financial strife. Expecting other clubs to do the opposite for them is highly hypocritical. 7
Morris Wanchuk Posted January 11 Posted January 11 15 minutes ago, LeytherRob said: Not to mention snapping up Watkins and Ackers from Toronto. Salford have consistently shown little mercy when other clubs have been in financial strife. Expecting other clubs to do the opposite for them is highly hypocritical. I think Salfords self inflicted predicament has become tiresome for a lot of people. 2
Worzel Posted January 12 Posted January 12 3 hours ago, Segovia Carpet said: The Rugby League family eh? The greed and honesty of the ppl behind these Vulture clubs shows their true position. Salford hold the players’ contracts. If you can afford them, you’ll keep them. If on the other hand you can’t, and you need to sell some players, then those clubs you’re slagging off will be the difference between you still having a team to support and not having one at all. Might be time to stop blaming outsiders, start smelling the coffee, and be grateful that the RFL and your fellow Super League members are trying to save you from yourselves. 7
JonM Posted January 12 Posted January 12 11 hours ago, Segovia Carpet said: The Rugby League family eh? The greed and honesty of the ppl behind these Vulture clubs shows their true position. Serious question - how many of the Salford squad were NOT signed from a different RL club by offering that player money? Are there any of the first team squad at all for whom that isn't true? 2
Charlie Posted January 12 Posted January 12 8 hours ago, Worzel said: Salford hold the players’ contracts. If you can afford them, you’ll keep them. If on the other hand you can’t, and you need to sell some players, then those clubs you’re slagging off will be the difference between you still having a team to support and not having one at all. Might be time to stop blaming outsiders, start smelling the coffee, and be grateful that the RFL and your fellow Super League members are trying to save you from yourselves. I wouldn’t say there other clubs are trying to save anyone there looking after there best interests which is completely fair
Charlie Posted January 12 Posted January 12 49 minutes ago, JonM said: Serious question - how many of the Salford squad were NOT signed from a different RL club by offering that player money? Are there any of the first team squad at all for whom that isn't true? Most of Salford squad is made up of players clubs didn’t want don’t forget other then London they were the lowest spending side last season.
phiggins Posted January 12 Posted January 12 21 minutes ago, Charlie said: Most of Salford squad is made up of players clubs didn’t want don’t forget other then London they were the lowest spending side last season. Is there actually any evidence of that claim? I seriously doubt they spent less than Cas for example. Their first 13/17 players will be on a decent amount relative to the rest of the league imo. 2
Charlie Posted January 12 Posted January 12 6 minutes ago, phiggins said: Is there actually any evidence of that claim? I seriously doubt they spent less than Cas for example. Their first 13/17 players will be on a decent amount relative to the rest of the league imo. https://www.totalrl.com/every-super-league-clubs-estimated-salary-spend-for-2024/ it’s pretty well documented
Charlie Posted January 12 Posted January 12 9 minutes ago, phiggins said: Is there actually any evidence of that claim? I seriously doubt they spent less than Cas for example. Their first 13/17 players will be on a decent amount relative to the rest of the league imo. A lot of the plays that have come to Salford haven’t been wanted by there clubs so they get them on decent deals. That’s why I put rowley as the clubs top asset
M j M Posted January 12 Posted January 12 27 minutes ago, phiggins said: Is there actually any evidence of that claim? I seriously doubt they spent less than Cas for example. Their first 13/17 players will be on a decent amount relative to the rest of the league imo. It's hard to know for sure from the outside but we all know Salford pick up, for want of a better word, rejects from other clubs that Rowley specialises in bringing back to good form. So by default they tend to get players on the cheap.
Morris Wanchuk Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 hours ago, Charlie said: https://www.totalrl.com/every-super-league-clubs-estimated-salary-spend-for-2024/ it’s pretty well documented Well if Salford do spend less than anyone else and are still skint it just shows that they aren’t a viable SL club in their current guise. You do have to acknowledge what a great job Rowley is doing.
JonM Posted January 12 Posted January 12 3 hours ago, Charlie said: A lot of the plays that have come to Salford haven’t been wanted by there clubs so they get them on decent deals. That’s why I put rowley as the clubs top asset I mean, speaking as a Widnes fan, I'm pretty confident we would've loved to have kept say Deon Cross, Tyler Dupree or Joe Mellor. And the fact that 7+ SL clubs have expressed interest in Salford players according to the above story makes me thing that at least some of the Salford players were actually wanted by other clubs. It's not like say London Broncos where you had a squad of players largely produced locally who're being picked off by 'vulture clubs' or the many other clubs who field a team with large numbers of products of their own academy. These are players that Salford have signed from other professional clubs with a promise of being paid a certain amount, who're now potentially moving to other professional clubs who have the money to actually pay them their wages.
Charlie Posted January 12 Posted January 12 7 minutes ago, JonM said: I mean, speaking as a Widnes fan, I'm pretty confident we would've loved to have kept say Deon Cross, Tyler Dupree or Joe Mellor. And the fact that 7+ SL clubs have expressed interest in Salford players according to the above story makes me thing that at least some of the Salford players were actually wanted by other clubs. It's not like say London Broncos where you had a squad of players largely produced locally who're being picked off by 'vulture clubs' or the many other clubs who field a team with large numbers of products of their own academy. These are players that Salford have signed from other professional clubs with a promise of being paid a certain amount, who're now potentially moving to other professional clubs who have the money to actually pay them their wages. Salford didn’t sign Mellor from Widnes? 1
JonM Posted January 12 Posted January 12 13 minutes ago, Charlie said: Salford didn’t sign Mellor from Widnes? No, he came from Leigh, via Toronto, having spent 7 seasons at Widnes. But my point remains - you can't get angry and throw about names like vulture about other clubs signing your players by offering to pay them when literally the entire Salford squad was signed from other professional clubs.
Worzel Posted January 12 Posted January 12 4 hours ago, Charlie said: I wouldn’t say there other clubs are trying to save anyone there looking after there best interests which is completely fair That’s one of way of looking at it certainly. But there’s an imbalance of need in your equation. The other clubs have an interest in improving their squads, but it’s not life or death so it’s marginal. Salford on the other hand may NEED those clubs to buy players in order to survive. Salford’s role is like the role of a pig and in egg and bacon sandwich, whereas the clubs are just like the chicken. The chicken is involved in making the sandwich, sure, but the pig? The pig is truly committed
Charlie Posted January 12 Posted January 12 8 minutes ago, JonM said: No, he came from Leigh, via Toronto, having spent 7 seasons at Widnes. But my point remains - you can't get angry and throw about names like vulture about other clubs signing your players by offering to pay them when literally the entire Salford squad was signed from other professional clubs. I’ve not called anyone vultures? Just pointed out the fact Salford don’t spend that much and normally pick up cast offs
Charlie Posted January 12 Posted January 12 6 minutes ago, Worzel said: That’s one of way of looking at it certainly. But there’s an imbalance of need in your equation. The other clubs have an interest in improving their squads, but it’s not life or death so it’s marginal. Salford on the other hand may NEED those clubs to buy players in order to survive. Salford’s role is like the role of a pig and in egg and bacon sandwich, whereas the clubs are just like the chicken. The chicken is involved in making the sandwich, sure, but the pig? The pig is truly committed Personally if no investment comes and the club needs to sell which may happen I’d rather they pull out off sl
Wakefield Ram Posted January 12 Posted January 12 3 hours ago, Charlie said: https://www.totalrl.com/every-super-league-clubs-estimated-salary-spend-for-2024/ it’s pretty well documented Good job there's a salary cap to level up the competition....
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now