Jump to content

Is Nigel happy with what he left behind?


iangidds

Recommended Posts

Reading about RL is often a hardship rather than a joy and I often despair at the situation we are in ; this generally leads to middle age anger and sadness as I look back through the Rose tinted glasses!

I come back to the main man in charge who appears to have walked away from the game after collecting a huge wage for 10 years as well as a handsome payoff and a new job probably very highly paid again! Did Nigel achieve any real good things? Or are we just focusing on the negative aspects of his regime?? (there are a lot)

I know Nigel is for expansion of the game but can anyone place a positive spin on his tenure? I would like to place my grumpy old man syndrome somewhere else !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

No-one gets a juicy payoff for walking.  

He was removed.  He knows what the new structure means for CH and L1 and was totally against it.  He's more or less said it's the end for many lower league clubs with SL planning to pull up the drawbridge.

The SL boys didn't like him trying to block their plans so he had to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was never a fan of him at all. If I was looking to name some of the positives then maybe the total figure from Sky for the current deal was a good amount of cash to secure? 

Getting the financial commitment from the UK Government for 2021 World Cup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expansion via Catalans. 

Magic Weekend.

RLWC 2013

Huge investment for RLWC 2021

Admission of TWP

Some decent stuff there, could easily be balanced with negatives. Depends on how happy you are overall, and it will be interesting to see how the next 5 years go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Dave T said:

Expansion via Catalans. 

Magic Weekend.

RLWC 2013

Huge investment for RLWC 2021

Admission of TWP

Some decent stuff there, could easily be balanced with negatives. Depends on how happy you are overall, and it will be interesting to see how the next 5 years go.

Catalans was under Richard Lewis. Celtic Crusaders was under Wood's watch though.

The Magic Weekend isn't anything to shout about. It's a simple marketing gimmick that hasn't grown since Day 1 and still relies on the same fans that would go to watch their clubs at home anyway.

As for the rest it's pretty basic stuff in my book and any competent CEO would have achieved the same or better. Hopefully that would be without decimating the youth and amateur game and getting rid of development officers which happened with Wood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Damien said:

Catalans was under Richard Lewis. Celtic Crusaders was under Wood's watch though.

The Magic Weekend isn't anything to shout about. It's a simple marketing gimmick that hasn't grown since Day 1 and still relies on the same fans that would go to watch their clubs at home anyway.

As for the rest it's pretty basic stuff in my book and any competent CEO would have achieved the same or better. Hopefully that would be without decimating the youth and amateur game and getting rid of development officers which happened with Wood.

As I say, people will decide what they like and don't, but as we saw in 2017 and 2000 a successful World Cup isn't a given. He led that very well, and secured unprecedented government funding for 2021.

I meant to acknowledge the overlap with Richard Lewis, particularly on the Catalans point, but I remember a conversation I had with Lewis where he spoken very very highly of Wood, and indeed set Wood up to take over his role.

Magic is always up for debate, bu personally I think it has been a positive move for the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Colin James said:

Toronto was a fluke. It's not like Wood went out looking for it. The Wolfpack project was self-driven and I don't particularly think anyone at the RFL deserves much credit on that front.

 

It would have been extremely easy to just say no to them.

Plenty would have, it would appear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Colin James said:

Toronto was a fluke. It's not like Wood went out looking for it. The Wolfpack project was self-driven and I don't particularly think anyone at the RFL deserves much credit on that front.

 

That's a very pertinent point. Toronto has been a Godsend and certainly not of the RFL's making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dave T said:

It would have been extremely easy to just say no to them.

Plenty would have, it would appear.

Perhaps but they had done all the work, secured the finances and solutions to lots of the potential issues. My view would be different if it was Wood/The RFL's idea. They merely signed it off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Colin James said:

Perhaps but they had done all the work, secured the finances and solutions to lots of the potential issues. My view would be different if it was Wood/The RFL's idea. They merely signed it off.

I don't believe credit can only be given when an individual comes up with the idea personally. We have seen the amount of resistance to new things - 'they merely signed it off' is underplaying this quite a lot imho.

But I aint gonna spend too much time defending Nigel Wood on here, I think that is a thankless task! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Wood is the devil some paint him as, but I certainly do question whether he was any good at his job...I've got the same questions about Rimmer. The RFL inspire no confidence at all with these guys  Neither is particularly impressive, in the way Elstone comes across. I also question Wood's ethics, accepting such a big payout when he had another job in the sport to go to (in what is essentially a development and expansion body), while the RFL was having to shed development officers. Legally entitled he may have been, but it still irks me.

Edit: I realise I've probably gone on to contradict my first statement!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Dave T said:

I don't believe credit can only be given when an individual comes up with the idea personally. We have seen the amount of resistance to new things - 'they merely signed it off' is underplaying this quite a lot imho.

But I aint gonna spend too much time defending Nigel Wood on here, I think that is a thankless task! :biggrin:

Wasn't one his last nobs in the RL going and doing a feasibility study on Ney York? Whatever happened to that if I am correct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some good things happened under Wood; plenty of bad things too. I wouldn't consider myself knowledgeable enough to say which ones he had the most influence in. The 2013 World Cup, and prep for the next one, are definitely good things that happened during his tenure.

Ten years ago, though, I was definitely one of those who would stand up for the RFL as not getting a fair deal. Over that period, there have been enough cock-ups and failures to erode my confidence quite significantly in them as an organisation - from Exiles and Stobarts, to the 8s and the loss of test matches in London.

I can confirm 30+ less sales for Scotland vs Italy at Workington, after this afternoons test purchase for the Tonga match, £7.50 is extremely reasonable, however a £2.50 'delivery' fee for a walk in purchase is beyond taking the mickey, good luck with that, it's cheaper on the telly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...