Jump to content

The lowest score that's never happened


Recommended Posts


13 minutes ago, ivans82 said:

Wild guess   1-1 .   

I think you might be right. NRL (actually NSWRL) had a 1-0 and a 0-0 but I'm not aware of a 1-1

This year's GF in the NSW Womens Comp was 1-0

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we just talking about the top flight, professional, or all levels? I've seen a 1-0 in person in a SL academy game. I also know that 0-0 was reasonably common back when the sport was in its infancy.

I know that once upon a time in rugby a try wasn't actually worth any points at all. It was called a try because it allowed you to "try" to kick a goal. Although I believe that by the time of the Northern Union this had been dropped and tries were worth 3.

I'm going to go for 4-1, but it is purely a guess.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are talking modern scoring then I would suggest a scoreline like 5-3 would be very uncommon.

5 would either be 2 penalty goals and a drop or an unconverted try and a drop (yes, technically 5 or 3 drop goals but extremely unlikely).

While 3 is either a penalty and a drop or (more unlikely), 3 drop goals.

Edited by Dunbar

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Farmduck said:

I think you might be right. NRL (actually NSWRL) had a 1-0 and a 0-0 but I'm not aware of a 1-1

This year's GF in the NSW Womens Comp was 1-0

Worth mentioning that the Mounties/Bulldogs women's GF was an enthralling high-quality game.

One of the best games I've ever seen live was 1-0 with 2 minutes to go. Whereupon the mighty Lions iced it with a converted (3-point) try.

Salford 0 Swinton 6. Glorious day, and we managed to dodge the yobs inside and outside the Willows. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was an OZ game you can bet Ken Wilson was involved. Here are the scores from 5 consecutive Newtown games in 1974:

9 - 11,  0-5,  7-3, 5-9, 3-4

Ken also played in the 1-0 and the 0-0

33 minutes ago, Dunbar said:

If we are talking modern scoring then I would suggest a scoreline like 5-3 would be very uncommon.

5 would either be 2 penalty goals and a drop or an unconverted try and a drop (yes, technically 5 or 3 drop goals but extremely unlikely).

While 3 is either a penalty and a drop or (more unlikely), 3 drop goals.

I've found 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 5-8, 5-9, 5-10,

No 5-1 yet. The 5-3 was in 1915: Newtown 5 Easts 3

Then another one in 1915 Wests beat Annandale 5-3 then Annandale beat Souths 3-2

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Farmduck said:

If it was an OZ game you can bet Ken Wilson was involved. Here are the scores from 5 consecutive Newtown games in 1974:

9 - 11,  0-5,  7-3, 5-9, 3-4

Ken also played in the 1-0 and the 0-0

I've found 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 5-8, 5-9, 5-10,

No 5-1 yet. The 5-3 was in 1915: Newtown 5 Easts 3

Then another one in 1915 Wests beat Annandale 5-3 then Annandale beat Souths 3-2

 

Yes, much more likely when it was a 3 point try.  As I say, under modern scoring this would be less likely.

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Farmduck said:

If it was an OZ game you can bet Ken Wilson was involved. Here are the scores from 5 consecutive Newtown games in 1974:

9 - 11,  0-5,  7-3, 5-9, 3-4

Ken also played in the 1-0 and the 0-0

I've found 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 5-8, 5-9, 5-10,

No 5-1 yet. The 5-3 was in 1915: Newtown 5 Easts 3

Then another one in 1915 Wests beat Annandale 5-3 then Annandale beat Souths 3-2

 

I present to you... the NRL Scorigami chart!

Apparently there has never been at 2-1 down under...

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sam4731 said:

Surely it's a scoreline with a 2 point margin with the drop goal being available.

Oddly enough, I looked through the earliest seasons of the NSWRL when there were some very low scores and fied goals were very rare. Some teams didn't kick any in a whole season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gav Wilson said:

I present to you... the NRL Scorigami chart!

Apparently there has never been at 2-1 down under...

I remember the game that came close. St George v Parra 2006. 0-0 at HT then 2-1 with only a couple of minutes left then in the midst of some confusion over a ref call, Matt Cooper scored for St George. FT: 8 - 1

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, JM2010 said:

I remember Halifax beating Hull KR 4 -3, I think, in the CC semi final. If my memory serves me correct Halifax scored a late try from a kick to win it

I reckon 4-3 would be a common score in the first few years of the game.   It was a low scoring brand of game - Manningham scored less than 9 points a game on average yet won the Championship.

2-0, 3-0, 4-0, 5-2, 5-3 would be similarly common.

Most likely candidates are 2-1, 3-1, 4-1 and the like, because 1 was impossible until 1974, by which time the game was more open.

  • Like 1

"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Griff said:

I reckon 4-3 would be a common score in the first few years of the game.   It was a low scoring brand of game - Manningham scored less than 9 points a game on average yet won the Championship.

2-0, 3-0, 4-0, 5-2, 5-3 would be similarly common.

Most likely candidates are 2-1, 3-1, 4-1 and the like, because 1 was impossible until 1974, by which time the game was more open.

This wasn’t in the first few years of the game, it was 1988 I think

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JM2010 said:

This wasn’t in the first few years of the game, it was 1988 I think

It was indeed.  After a 0-0 draw.   I was there.

But we're talking about a score that never happened.

Ever.

  • Like 1

"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Gav Wilson said:

I present to you... the NRL Scorigami chart!

Apparently there has never been at 2-1 down under...

Indeed -  only three teams have scored one in a game. 1-0, 1-8, 1-14.

But this is just NRL games.

"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MZH said:

Are we just talking about the top flight, professional, or all levels? I've seen a 1-0 in person in a SL academy game. I also know that 0-0 was reasonably common back when the sport was in its infancy.

I know that once upon a time in rugby a try wasn't actually worth any points at all. It was called a try because it allowed you to "try" to kick a goal. Although I believe that by the time of the Northern Union this had been dropped and tries were worth 3.

I'm going to go for 4-1, but it is purely a guess.

I remember Hull playing Warrington in 1990 or 91 and winning 3-2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.